June 12, 2008 3:57 PM PDT

The rocky road to Tru2way

by John P. Falcone
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 2 comments

Tru2way logo (Credit: CableLabs)

Update: Subsequent to the publication of this story, Panasonic has released a more detailed statement on the status of its Tru2way TVs.

CableLabs' Tru2way got a big boost last month when Sony signed on with a pledge to design and deliver TVs that incorporate the standard, bolstering an already impressive list of backers. The Web was flooded with optimistic reports of a post-cable box Valhalla where you could simply buy a Tru2way TV, screw in your coaxial cable, and have plug-and-play access to your 1,000-channel universe. Before those miracle TVs hit the market, however, they need to be certified by CableLabs--and there are rumors that the initial trials aren't going well. According to IP Democracy, the initial certification tests for Panasonic Tru2way TVs were unsuccessful--to say the least. The post cites "folks close to Tru2way" as calling the Panasonic tests a "'disaster of spectacular proportions'" that resulted in "'dozens and dozens' of bugs."

In an attempt to verify those dire--but anonymous--quotes, we contacted Panasonic and CableLabs for their responses. Panasonic gave us a quick "no comment," but CableLabs provided a [somewhat] more detailed retort:

Certification test results are not published by CableLabs. While we cannot address speculation made in the media about specific tests results, it is important to understand that it is common for devices to require multiple test runs before achieving CableLabs certification. Manufacturers generally account for such timing in their product plans. CableLabs conducts multiple test waves throughout the year in order to accommodate additional testing. Panasonic has entered an upcoming certification wave, which provides ample time for products to reach the marketplace to meet the company's rollout schedule. Other tru2way products, including products from Samsung and ADB have already been Certified by CableLabs.

The Samsung certification was actually a 2005 product that--to my knowledge--has never been commercially released. The ADB products are set-top boxes and media centers that appear to be intended for cable companies to license to consumers. To me, the ADB products seem counterintuitive to the whole idea of the Tru2way model--I thought the idea here was for Tru2way to provide a framework that would allow for the release of TVs and DVRs that consumers could buy at Best Buy or Circuit City, and hook up as easily as a standard DVD player.

So, what's it all mean? The nondenials from Panasonic and CableLabs make me think that the substance of the IP Democracy report is true: the initial wave of Tru2way TVs aren't ready for prime time. But that's to be expected from a new technology that hasn't yet been released to the public (thus the whole point of certification testing--the bugs get extinguished before the products reach the public.)

A follow-up post on the IP Democracy post that purports to be from CableLabs says that the company is "confident in the technology and are on track to introduce this software platform and services at retail later this year in select markets." While they may technically hit that milestone with products like the ADB boxes, I think the real test will be whether or not we can buy Tru2way TVs--from Panasonic, Samsung, Sony, or any other company. And at this point, I still wouldn't be surprised if we don't see those products until sometime in 2009. But I hope I'm wrong.

IP Democracy via Gizmolovers

John P. Falcone covers home theater and network entertainment products. He's been writing for CNET since 2002.
Recent posts from Crave
Mitsubishi's bar serves up best TV sound
Need for Speed shifts onto the iPhone, again
Yotaro the crying baby-bot teaches parenting skills
This coffee mug stirs itself
Tax prep preview: Which DIY app is right for you?
Digital City 63: 'Avatar,' 3D PS3, CES, oh my!
Vestalife Firefly isn't as cutsie the name implies
Let Gramps crank up the volume with TV Ears
Add a Comment (Log in or register)
by mbdonovan June 13, 2008 11:28 AM PDT
With all due respect to IP Democracy and the usually misinformed Blogosphere in general let's cut Panasonic a little slack here. First off, as an industry insider I can testify to the rigorous testing performed by CableLabs. The goal is that products truly be interoperable and not just compliant. Anybody who is even peripherally involved with consumer electronics should understand the difference. OCAP (or now tru2way) is a very complicated spec that involves lots of moving parts. The receiver hardware must interface with the OCAP stack which must interface with the cable company's OCAP server carousel which must respond correctly to cues placed in the program stream. The stack must understand the requirements of the application, the limitations of the particular return path and the capabilities of the receiver hardware. As a cable TV programmer and future real world user of tru2way technology I would much rather fail these devices in test than release a product that meets the letter of the spec but doesn't work.
Reply to this comment
by riffkind June 13, 2008 4:11 PM PDT
Only one word to describe this article: FROTHY. Both CableLabs and Panasonic replied to the author by saying, stop frothing at the mouth we're still testing and you have no story.
Reply to this comment
advertisement
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

Behind the scenes: NORAD's Santa tracker

For decades, the defense group has let you follow the Christmas Eve travels of the jolly old elf. These days, technology is playing a bigger role than ever.

Intel redesigns Atom chip for Netbooks

The chipmaker officially announces the next generation of its popular Atom CPUs for Netbooks, the N450, weeks before the CES trade show.