• On TV.com: Sexy summer bodies photo gallery
May 30, 2008 8:24 AM PDT

Hybrid-electric carmaker readies 220 mpg 'super car'

by Martin LaMonica

Hybrid Technologies is preparing a '"green" sports car to submit in the Automotive X Prize contest, according to a report in Popular Mechanics.

The car will come in two versions: one for the Auto X Prize that will have a gasoline engine and battery and another all-electric version.

The as-yet-unnamed electric sports car being developed by Hybrid Technologies.

(Credit: Hybrid Technologies via Popular Mechanics.)

The gas-battery hybrid will get the equivalent of 220 miles per gallon while the all-electric will get 150 mpg to 180 mpg. A drivable prototype is set to hit the streets in September.

The idea is to make the X Prize entrant something that will result in a mass-produced electric car, the company told Popular Mechanics.

"We're looking for this car basically to end up mainstream--not just built for a one-and-done," project development engineer Ron Cerven told the magazine. "The X Prize car is going to be the purchasable--obviously a higher-end car, but there might be something else from us in the X Prize."

Hybrid Technologies doesn't get nearly as much attention as Tesla Motors and Fisker Automotive, which are both preparing hybrid-electric sports cars.

But Hybrid Technologies has ambitious plans to make a range of vehicles that run on lithium-based batteries, including scooters, bicycles, mopeds, motorcycles, and cars.

Originally posted at Green Tech
Martin LaMonica is a senior writer for CNET's Green Tech blog. He started at CNET News in 2002, covering IT and Web development. Before that, he was executive editor at IT publication InfoWorld. E-mail Martin.
Recent posts from Crave
Apple iTunes App Store turns one
Top 5 iPhone guitar tools
Amazon hooks up wireless store
The Real Deal 169: Travel tech tips
On the road with Autonet in-car Wi-Fi
Grazing robot would run on biomass
Concept Android phone features OLED buttons
2010 Jaguar XJ launched
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (25 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by epinion May 30, 2008 8:37 AM PDT
"The gas-battery hybrid will get 220 miles per gallon while the all-electric will get 150-180 miles per gallon. "

The ALL ELECTRIC will get 150-180 miles PER GALLON. Please clarify.
Reply to this comment
by Heebee Jeebies May 31, 2008 8:05 AM PDT
I am sure that that is equivalent. Since most people rate millage as MPG it makes sense that they would put it in that frame of reference for people. Though they could have said that.
by Zero187 May 30, 2008 8:44 AM PDT
"The gas-battery hybrid will get 220 miles per gallon while the all-electric will get 150-180 miles per gallon." Correct me if I'm wrong but my understanding of the issue is that "all-electric" means that it doesn't use gas.. So why are they saying 150-180 mpg? Did they mean miles per charge?
Reply to this comment
by Zero187 May 30, 2008 8:45 AM PDT
"The gas-battery hybrid will get 220 miles per gallon while the all-electric will get 150-180 miles per gallon." Correct me if I'm wrong but my understanding of the issue is that "all-electric" means that it doesn't use gas.. So why are they saying 150-180 mpg? Did they mean miles per charge?
Reply to this comment
by mlamonica May 30, 2008 8:57 AM PDT
All-electric cars use a standard conversion to do MPG equivalents.
by sanenazok May 30, 2008 9:03 AM PDT
Why isn't EEStor entering the contest?

Could it be that the X Prize requires a real product?

Reply to this comment
by ArnieB49 May 30, 2008 9:08 AM PDT
O.K., I'll bite. What does a 'gallon' of electricity cost?
Reply to this comment
by ArnieB49 May 30, 2008 9:08 AM PDT
O.K., I'll bite. What does a 'gallon' of electricity cost?
Reply to this comment
by mikekrause May 30, 2008 9:16 AM PDT
The better question is how much coal is burned in order to generate this electricity?
by fuzzyCWD June 1, 2008 8:08 PM PDT
6 cents per kilowatt gallon? sounds right to me...
by totalmonkey May 30, 2008 9:09 AM PDT
I'm sorry but any all-electric vehicle that doesn't get INFINITY miles per gallon is just not worth buying.

Also, I noticed that, so far, no one has commented on this sentence: "But Hybrid Technologies has ambitious plans to make a range of cars that run on lithium-based batteries, scooters, bicycles, mopeds, motorcycles, cars." I wonder how many miles per scooter that car will get, or maybe miles per car -- I would love a car that runs on lithium-based cars, but only if I can get it in black.
Reply to this comment
by Vik Hathi May 30, 2008 9:14 AM PDT
I think Martin means 150-180 glasses of whiskey.
Reply to this comment
by gsekse May 30, 2008 9:25 AM PDT
They maybe using the "electric power to gasoline" calculated equivelence. Not sure, but I have seen articles that specifically discuss it.
Reply to this comment
by mlamonica May 30, 2008 9:29 AM PDT
Yes, electric cars use a measure that's meant to be the equivalent of miles per gallon. Sorry for the confusion.

For the nitty gritty, here's a snippet from Tesla's web site: Conversion from electric consumption to gallons of gasoline equivalent is calculated using the EPA conversion factor documented in the Federal Register: June 12, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 113), Rules and Regulations, Pages 36985-36992.
Reply to this comment
by fuzzyCWD June 1, 2008 8:10 PM PDT
well, just take ALL THE FUN out of our sails...
by hornerj99 May 30, 2008 9:36 AM PDT
I believe the key phrase is "...will get the equivalent of 220....".
Reply to this comment
by ReVeLaTeD May 30, 2008 9:42 AM PDT
Finally...an efficient car that looks attractive. It's about time. Got tired of all of these horrendous looking hybrid cars.
Reply to this comment
by demner May 30, 2008 9:56 AM PDT
The term the article should use is "MPGe" (or MPG equivalent). So the electric motor uses the equivalent amount of energy as a 180MPG car (but of course with zero emissions). This metric is to account for differing battery sizes, fuel sources, etc
Reply to this comment
by Seaspray0 May 30, 2008 10:07 AM PDT
Hmmm.. what should they call it? Well, they named an SUV with a big engine that sux gas, gets poor milage, and was made to tow things like big boats or trailer homes through the countryside on camping trips but poorly suited to commuting a "Suburban". Maybe they should name a fuel efficent car not designed for towing and camping but perfect for suburban commuters the "terranaut" (land voyager). It would fit will in the subdivision of "Piney Shores" where there are no pines, nor shores.
Reply to this comment
by hador_nyc May 30, 2008 10:13 AM PDT
When they say 150-180 MPG, they probably mean equivalent energy.

1 gallon of gas has 1.3 X 10^8 joules of energy in it.
1 KWH is equal to 3.6 X 10^6 joules
therefore
1 gallon of gas is equivalent to about 36.1 KWH of power

Here's what they mean then.
The car is efficient enough to average 220 miles per gallon of gas, but the all electric version of the car is not so efficient; it only gets 150-180 miles on 36.1 KWH stored in it's batteries. This is probably due to the extra weight of the batteries. Liquid fuels store more energy per pound than batteries. Gas is stored in a tank, and electricity in this car is stored; probably; in Lithium Ion batteries. As per unit weight, gasoline stores more joules of energy per unit mass than lithium ion batteries.

Gas also has the advantage of being used up as it goes. When you burn the gas, it's mass is converted into exhaust, and goes from the tank to the atmosphere. The batteries don't lose mass when the energy is used up. Think about it, your dead AA batteries aren't any lighter than when they were new, but carrying a tank of gas from the station to your lawnmower is harder than walking the empty tank to the station.

So, the article does make perfect sense.
Reply to this comment
by mattblasi May 30, 2008 10:20 AM PDT
First to totalmonkey, I think you need to reread that last sentence there is an "including" there that you missed.

About the car, it sounds like a great idea, but honestly my concern is price point and actual usability. Look at the other entrants for the X Prize they are cars that yes can get you from point A to B but are so light and small that they have less room than a Smart car. I have seen in persona many of the entries for the contest and so far have seen none that would make a good reliable usable method of transportation.

The reason most of these vehicles are getting great gas mileage is due to their weight and lack of structure. Good examples include the K1 Attack that was created as a hybrid, and the entry using an Ariel Atom chassis. I would not think it too hard to get great gas mileage when you are converting a car that already can get 30 mpg on a supercharged 4cyl gas motor over to a electric/gas hybrid.

Now lets look at cost, the Tesla Roadster which has gotten a great deal of fame is great for gas but the trade off is now you are spending $110K for the car. My annual gas cost on my 700rwhp turbocharged mustang is less than $4,000 a year so with a car that I have $40K into it would take me over 17 years to break even. Where is the trade off. A Toyota Prius has a better return on value.

I would love to see a production car come out of the X Prize but the rules for the contest do not focus on that and thus it will not happen. What I would pay more attention to is the auto manufacturers who are doing their own testing. Examples include the BMW Hydrogen 7Series, the Nissan Cube, the Audi's with their Bio Diesel and lets look at the fact that many race cars are running on E85 Ethanol.

In the end we will have to wait and see but at some point the manufacturers are going to need to pick a direction, just at the moment no one can decide which is the better option to adopt.
Reply to this comment
by totalmonkey August 4, 2008 7:32 AM PDT
The "including" was edited into the article after the fact -- my text was copy-and-pasted directly from the article. I just find it a little disheartening that most online "news" outlets these days do little-to-zero copyediting these days, and rely on post-publish reader comments for copy-checking. Journalism has taken quite a fall over the years, in content, merit, and quality.
by chuck_whealton May 30, 2008 1:13 PM PDT
All I have to say is that I hope they REALLY do make one that can be AFFORDED by the masses.

Charles R. Whealton
Charles Whealton @ pleasedontspam.com
Reply to this comment
by fuzzyCWD June 1, 2008 8:15 PM PDT
i believe SCHWINN made one that is both economical, ecological, and affordable. they called it a BICYCLE.
by strategynode June 7, 2008 1:04 PM PDT
Cool exterior design, not so sure about its innards.
Reply to this comment
(25 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

With Chrome, Google reignites the OS wars

roundup Google Chrome OS, due in 2010, underscores the Web giant's cloud-computing ambitions and opens new competition with Microsoft.
• What Chrome OS has on Windows that Linux doesn't

Laying a guilt trip on military robots

q&a Georgia Tech's Ronald Arkin aims to configure armed robots with a built-in "guilt system" to help them avoid civilian casualties.

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right