May 27, 2008 2:15 PM PDT

New Mexico group lobbies to ban Wi-Fi in public buildings

by Michelle Thatcher
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 10 comments
radio antennae

A group of "electro-sensitive" Santa Fe residents has asked the city government to ban Wi-Fi from public buildings. The group's members attribute a range of symptoms, such as chest pains and headaches, to the electric fields produced by Wi-Fi routers and cell phones.

The citizens claim that Wi-Fi networks in libraries and other civic buildings constitute discrimination as defined in the Americans with Disabilities Act. The city attorney is looking into the matter and expects to make a legal recommendation by the end of the month.

This isn't the first report of a so-called "gadget allergy." We mused on the subject about a year ago, when the Daily Mail ran a story about a woman who experienced a severe allergic reaction to a broad range of electromagnetic fields. And even earlier, scientists at the University of Essex found sufficient numbers of people claiming to suffer from "electromagnetic hypersensitivity" (EHS) to launch a scientific study of the matter.

It's worth noting that the World Health Organization currently doesn't give much credit to EHS claims: "Well controlled and conducted double-blind studies have shown that symptoms were not correlated with EMF exposure." Judging from the comments on the original news story, the average citizen doesn't, either.

Michelle Thatcher has been reviewing technology products for nearly a decade. Her current focus is laptop reviews, with some kitchen gadgetry and Web 2.0 thrown in for good measure.
Recent posts from Crave
Get freaky with samurai sword earbuds
The 404 Yuletide Mini-sode: Where The 404 is the Fifth Element
Running World of Warcraft in Ubuntu Linux
Last-minute deal: Buy an Olive 4 or 4 HD, get the Beatles Remastered free
Reports: Panasonic battery to power homes for one week
Will the Apple tablet be a full-fledged computer?
New, terrifying, no-electronics U.S. flight security rules?
Apple's iSlate: What we know for sure
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by ironman5000 May 27, 2008 2:36 PM PDT
i hope to god they dont enact the ban. They shouldnt bend over backwards for .01% of the population.


haha, no public wifi...ya ok...lets go back to 1993. dumb *****
Reply to this comment
by castrensis May 28, 2008 5:44 AM PDT
Well, the point isn't that we shouldn't make reasonable accommodations for people who have legitimate medical conditions. What the WHO is telling us is that when similar luddites were put in a room and exposed to EMFs there was not a correlation between exposure to EMFs and manifestation of symptoms. The medical establishment calls it a "psychosomatic" illness. Most grounded folks call it what it is: faking it.
Reply to this comment
by zgreenwell May 28, 2008 7:35 AM PDT
Hypochondriacs.
Reply to this comment
by b_baggins May 28, 2008 8:30 AM PDT
this is bogus. If these people were so allergic, they'd have been getting sick every time their cordless phone rings.
Reply to this comment
by bLaCkAnGeL07 May 28, 2008 8:56 AM PDT
Antigens that enter the body through main portals of entry (i.e. nose, mouth, eyes) cause allergies. This is a couple of hypochondriacs associating their health problems (probably something minor nonetheless) with something they don't use or know anything about obviously. This claim is ridiculous and these people should be educated.
Reply to this comment
by Raymond Lui May 28, 2008 12:13 PM PDT
Ridiculous

There GSM, CDMA signals all over the place, DTV broadcast, countless of others going all over the place

And ban Wi-Fi?

Well, how about this,
the government could create an area for them in Alaska or Nevada that's free of EMFs .
No TV Broadcast, no Cellphone Coverage.
Now they can have a good sleep then. Right?
Reply to this comment
by Composer_1777 May 28, 2008 2:21 PM PDT
Instead of trying to ban wi-fi maybe these people and others should work on getting our government back into the hands of the people and help stop communist laws from passing rather than waste time and money on something so absurd, so rediculous, so unbelievably stupid that it is beyond comprehension. This will never pass because i'm sure the majority of people in Santa fe will be outraged.
Reply to this comment
by i_am_still_wade May 28, 2008 5:43 PM PDT
Remind me again how a 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi device causes people to feel sick and yet how no other wireless radio wave does? I would like to do a blind study on these people. Put them in several rooms, don't tell them which has Wi-Fi and which doesn't, and see how many times they get it right. You have to do it many times to eliminate randomness.

I think what they really are allergic to the odors of people in confined spaces. If someone wears perfume or cologne or burns incense, I sneeze a lot and will eventually get a headache. So, maybe I should ask Santa Fe to ban perfume and cologne based on the ADA.
Reply to this comment
by Lemon5 May 31, 2008 7:32 AM PDT
I think these people are just being stupid now. I mean come on, does your microwave screw with you? Do radio waves screw with you? Cell phones have been around for awhile now, do they screw with you? I am saying these people are idiots for one thing. Another thing is that the next thing they are going to do is sue someone for some insane amount of money. It is a very sad cycle that always seems to happen in the US. It really needs to stop.
Reply to this comment
by derrp June 19, 2008 7:20 PM PDT
I'm sorry the needs of the 99.999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% of people outweigh the 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001%
of people that have this condition, if they do, (Probably just nuts and imagining the ch1t, but for the 1 (one) person in billions who legitimately (still doubt it , anything is possible?
) I say . LEAVE.. the US needs to build a wireless infrastructure and it's happening so go to some remote island, or stop your b1tching, or live in a Faraday cage? I dunno but DON"T STOP WIRELESS FOR MILLIONS because maybe 1 person who i suspect is just mental is saying they have health effects ... ridiculous ... that 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000001%
is not worth it to our: economy, technology infrastructure etc, already it's hard to compete with the world without theses whiner's/ :-/
Reply to this comment
(10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.