• On The Insider: Judge Bans Real Housewives Sex Tape
May 7, 2008 2:24 PM PDT

Who makes the most reliable laptops?

by Dan Ackerman

One question we get pretty frequently is some variation on "Which laptop brand is most reliable?" It's an important question, as laptops can be tough to fix, with pretty much no user-serviceable parts inside (yes, I'm sure you're all clever enough to pop open your laptop chassis and tinker around; I'm talking about all the other laptop owners out there). That means if something goes wrong with your laptop, it's a pretty much guaranteed trip to a repair center.

Most people rely on anecdotal evidence to pick a laptop they think won't break down--relying on horror stories from friends or the Internet. Of course, every manufacturer has a mile-long list of angry customers who have not gotten satisfaction from indifferent tech support telephone drones, fine-print-filled warranties, or shady third-party repair services.

(Credit: Consumer Reports)

The detail-minded folks at Consumer Reports have just put out their annual look at the computer industry, and while our colleague Tom Krazit has already pointed out that Apple ranks at the top of the list for laptop tech support, (with HP in last place), we're more interested in the brand repair history chart from the same issue.

The chart shows data from about 75,000 laptops purchased between 2003 and 2007, recording how many have had a serious problem requiring repair. The companies listed are Lenovo, Compaq, Sony, Toshiba, Dell, HP, Gateway, and Apple, and all scored between 20 percent and 23 percent. Consumer Reports says a difference of less than three points is statistically "not meaningful."

So, there you have it--no major laptop brand is really much more likely to break down than any other. Why? Because most laptops are essentially commodity products, made from the exact same components, and differentiated only by their outer shells and extra features. So, next time someone says not to buy a laptop from a certain vendor because they "break down all the time," you can assure them that there's about a 1-in-5 chance their laptop will develop a major problem, no matter where it came from.

New York native Dan Ackerman, a former radio DJ turned journalist, has written about technology and music for publications including Spin, Blender, The Hollywood Reporter, and USA Today. He hosts the weekly Digital City podcast and the New York edition of Editors' Office Hours. Dan's new album, Tales Out of Night School, is available now. E-mail Dan.
Recent posts from Crave
Poll: Why don't you have an iPod or MP3 player?
Oppo's affordabe high-end Blu-ray player is here
iPhone 3GS jailbreak, 'purplera1n,' hits Web
Apple patents point to haptics, fingerprints, RFID
Friday Poll: We the ppl--imagining a digital 1776
Gadgettes 144: The Childhood Nostalgia Episode
Duet D8 is no iPhone clone
Rocking out with stereo Bluetooth
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (13 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Delfairen May 7, 2008 3:28 PM PDT
Of course Apple has more laptops repaired than any of the others. When your laptop costs three times as much you don't mind the repair bill. The others owners just look and say I can buy a new one cheaper than having this repaired and it will be newer and faster.
Reply to this comment
by kingrah1 May 7, 2008 3:49 PM PDT
that is so right
by masterjim May 7, 2008 4:12 PM PDT
Also,many brands were left out like Acer,Fujitsu and Asus. Fujitsu is among the lowest needing repairs at 8%. Dell was previously at 29%. So Dell has improved since.
Reply to this comment
by fschoonbaert May 7, 2008 4:14 PM PDT
Guys I have had a lot of laptops over the years as a roadwarrior and been involved in a number of IT departments. The worst experiences with laptops owned by people who travel a lot we have had with Dell (plastic clips that hold the unit together break) and Acer. The best experience without a doubt is with Panasonic. You just can't break those units. Throw coffee on them drop them from a couple of feet height and they just keep working as if nothing has happened. Not even a scratch on the case.

The Panasonics are expensive (so you'll ahve it reapisred if it breaks) but I can definitely say that they are worth it if you travel extensively or work in a dirty or rough environment.
Reply to this comment
by Kalam1ty May 7, 2008 8:20 PM PDT
Gotta say, when you take into account that brands like Lenovo sell far more laptops not only to consumers but to businesses as well and still have lower repair rates than other brands, it's pretty impressive (typing this from my T61 <3 )
Reply to this comment
by gary85739 May 8, 2008 6:06 AM PDT
Try Sager, they have all sizes and work well. Good tech support.
Reply to this comment
by clarrkkent May 8, 2008 6:10 AM PDT
And this is news?? It's unfortunate, but should be well known that software/hardware malfunctions will occur. They are inevitable. I wholly agree with HP being last for service. I've had 3 very extremely unpleasant experiences with them. I've since gone with Apple. People should shop based on how they will be treated WHEN their laptop becomes a paperweight, not try to avoid repairs altogether (it's impossible).
Reply to this comment
by ejeon1989 May 8, 2008 7:33 AM PDT
Haha, they should have Panasonic on their too. Their toughbooks (I have the CF-19 tablet) are damned near indestructable.
Reply to this comment
by highlander2000 May 8, 2008 7:53 AM PDT
Nice article, just would have liked to see more brands if they were included (as masterjim noted).
Reply to this comment
by JustSKJ May 9, 2008 1:44 AM PDT
I have used a Dell, Toshiba, HP, Apple & Sony. And then I used a Thinkpad and have never touched anything else. My sincere opinion? Nothing beats a Thinkpad.
Reply to this comment
by Igiveup2 May 9, 2008 1:06 PM PDT
The time period covered by the survey includes Toshiba's woeful Pentium 4 era, so it's interesting that they still have a better reliability record than Dell and Apple. I believe HP also produced some P4 units that were pretty bad. It would be interesting to see how Toshiba and HP would compare with the rest if the P4 anomaly were subtracted out.

This puts to rest the myth that the added cost of Apple is for better, more reliable hardware.
Reply to this comment
by MasterofMen May 9, 2008 7:18 PM PDT
Twenty percent means one in five will die/need "serious" repairs. Why not fifteen, te, or five percent?

I have a Panasonic TV. It had something wrong with the motherboard. By the time I complained about it, it was out of warranty. TV=$600, Repair=$200, TV life=fourteen-plus years. I have a Quadra 840 with the same life-span. Obviously, the engineering on portable computers is not up to snuff!
Reply to this comment
by fultron78 January 5, 2009 3:06 PM PST
"Consumer Reports says a difference of less than three points is statistically "not meaningful.""

Uh, what?

There is no way the statistical error is 3% if they based this study on 75000 laptops.

Do the math. The claim in this article doesn't make sense.
Reply to this comment
(13 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

Making sense of Windows 7 upgrades

faq The basics and the fine print on Microsoft's options for those eyeing the next operating system from Redmond.
• Full Windows 7 coverage

Road Trip 2009: Big Sky Country

CNET News reporter Daniel Terdiman takes his car full of gadgets to the Rockies and the Great Plains in search of tech, science, nature, and more.
• America's Fortress: Cheyenne Mountain

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right