LaCie releases external hard drive with eSATA
LaCie has put another Triple Interface external hard drive on the market today, and although it looks very similar to the rest of their line (Neil Poulton also designed this one), there's one striking difference: they've included an eSATA port in addition to Firewire 400 and USB 2.0.
External Serial Advanced Technology Attachment eliminates the need to translate data between the computer and the storage drive which speeds up the process to almost triple the speed of Firewire 400 and USB 2.0. We're hoping it'll usher in a new era of hard drives featuring this faster bus interface.
The drive is available now in 500GB, 750GB, and 1TB capacities.
On Sale Now: $69.99 - $99.99
View the latest prices for LaCie Neil Poulton Hard Disk MAX (500GB)
On Sale Now: $96.00 - $139.99
View the latest prices for LaCie Hard Disk Design by Neil Poulton (1TB)
Justin Yu covers desktop computers, printers, and peripherals for CNET. When he's not scouring eBay for useless ephemera or eating hot dogs for breakfast, he spends his time making fun of Internet culture every morning on The 404 podcast. E-mail Justin. 

<Apple zealots thinking LaCie is the holier-than-thou external drive mfg of choice annoy me.>
LaCie introduces first external hard drive with eSATA interface
I'm not an Apple zealout, but this is just so grossly inaccurate you guys should own up to it and call it a day...
- by justin.yu April 3, 2008 2:57 PM PDT
- to clear up all confusion:
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(9 Comments)i read your comments not knowing that a copy editor had shortened the headline to fit the page by deleting the "first" out of the original. in the original headline i should have written "lacie releases its first external hard drive eSATA." i was pointing out that prior to this hd, lacie had yet to include eSATA on any of their consumer level drives. a quote taken directly from the pr manager at lacie reads:
"This device includes eSATA which is very unique to LaCie as this is the first time such an interface is available on a consumer level product."
this mistake in syntax was compounded by post editing, making it look like we were back-tracking, which was not the case. apologies to all and thanks for keeping us on our toes!