• On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
February 26, 2008 1:42 PM PST

Sikorsky's helicopter of the future

by Jonathan Skillings
Sikorsky X2

With its X2 design, Sikorsky is betting that a helicopter can fly faster with coaxial main rotors and an unusual "propulsor" tail rotor.

(Credit: Sikorsky Aircraft)

How fast can a helicopter go? If Sikorsky Aircraft's plans work out, the answer could be: a lot faster than is possible right now.

For several years, Sikorsky has been working on what it calls X2 technology, a suite of systems that it says could let a helicopter "cruise comfortably" at 250 knots. That would be a far zippier pace than most current rotary wing aircraft can handle. The UH-60L variant of Sikorsky's Blackhawk, for instance, can fly at about 150 knots.

The tilt-wing MV-22 Osprey, meanwhile, can hit speeds upward of 240 knots, but it's a hybrid--half helicopter and half airplane. It can hover when its propellers are turned upward, but to go fast, it needs to fly like a plane. Sikorsky clearly has the controversial Osprey in its sights. The small chart here from Sikorsky suggests how an X2 aircraft could match the Osprey for speed while beating it at feats such as hovering. (The plane at lower right in the chart represents vertical-take-off jets like the Harrier.)

X2 vs. Osprey (Credit: Sikorsky Aircraft)

On Sunday, Sikorsky showed off its X2 Technology Demonstrator suite at Heli-Expo 2008 in Houston. A first test flight, however, remains some unspecified distance off in the future, with the research project having spent 2007 in build and subsystem test phase.

The most striking thing about the X2 design is that it makes use of coaxial main rotors, in contrast with the single main rotor that's been characteristic of mainstream helicopters since--well, since Igor Sikorsky himself helped popularize that arrangement in the 1940s. The coaxial rotor system has largely been the lonely province of helicopter makers like Russia's Kamov. (Tandem-rotor designs like the Chinook, meanwhile, have two large rotors fore and aft.)

The other notable aspect of the X2 is the rear-facing tail rotor. Helicopters like the Blackhawk with a single main rotor invariably have a tail rotor that faces the side, a necessity to counter the torque from the main rotor that would otherwise spin the fuselage like a top. The X2's coaxial setup would eliminate the torque, allowing the tail rotor to propel the helicopter forward much like the propeller on a ship.

Internally, an X2-based aircraft would have fly-by-wire (that is, electronic) flight controls, as opposed to traditional mechanical or hydraulic controls. Sikorsky says the eventual aircraft would serve as a "flying wind tunnel" to measure the performance of the rigid main rotors and their relationship to the rest of the aircraft's aerodynamics. No, nobody said that being a test pilot is easy.

At the Heli-Expo, a Sikorsky VP told Aviation Week that the company was gathering feedback from industry reps to help determine the initial commercial X2 product.

Originally posted at News Blog
Jonathan Skillings is managing editor of CNET News, based in the Boston bureau. He's been with CNET since 2000, after a decade in tech journalism at the IDG News Service, PC Week, and an AS/400 magazine. He's also been a soldier and a schoolteacher. E-mail Jon.
Recent posts from Crave
Ricoh goes modular for GXR camera system
Moxi cuts price on its DVR, adds step-up model with a triple tuner
2010 Tesla Roadster Sport first drive
Sneak peek: Xobni e-mail app for BlackBerry
The DIY secret-knock door lock
New BlackBerry software will make your phone cooler
The 411: Storage limits and more on data plans
Can Bheestie Bag save your soaked device?
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Kaman KMax
by boomslang February 26, 2008 7:11 PM PST
The KMax has the optimal cross-section for speed. It uses twin contra-rotating rotors mounted side-by-side and is just asking for a big propeller to be mounted on the end of the tailboom.

http://www.kamanaero.com/helicopters/kmax.html
Reply to this comment
Yeah the kmax is a crazy cool helicopter
by bob1xxxx February 28, 2008 12:33 AM PST
Yeah here in so cal were I live this fire season several Kmax helicopters did yoaman service with there extra large water buckets fighting the wild fires. Watch them on the tv news footage with the slightly slow mo you can clear see the rotors intermeshing with one another. Real the Kmax is a classic case of what old is new again, Kaman in the late 50's producted the airforce rescue helicopter called the Huskie, the Kmax is huskie revamped for strip down for heavy industrial helicrane and fire fighting
helicopter speed limits
by b_baggins February 27, 2008 9:01 AM PST
Helicopters have an inherent speed limit because of the way they
fly. As the chopper moves forward, lift increases on the forward
moving blade, and decreases on the rear-moving blade. After a
certain point, flight simply becomes impossible.
Reply to this comment
Hmmmm close but not really
by bob1xxxx February 27, 2008 11:55 PM PST
The current speed limit on helicopters is cause air shock wave, as blade one is moves closer to the speed of sound (ie around 420 mph) its shock wave is what cause blade two loose lift, the worlds fastest helicopter flew at 249.10 mph in a heavy modified westland lynx 1986. It my be possible with improve blade design to better the lynx's recorded speed what, but who knows.
This is not a new concept
by QueMike February 28, 2008 2:34 PM PST
Google the Sikorsky S-69. This is essentially a re-make of what they started 30 years ago. They solved the problem of high speed flight by cutting the rpm of the rotors by 1/3. They can do this because they are no longer dependent on the rotor generated force for forward flight. This mitigates the sonic effects of the advancing blade, and to cut down on drag, they null out the pitch on the retreating blade. This was a great idea 30 years ago and I wish they had continued to pursue it back then.
by helinet September 22, 2008 11:29 AM PDT
I can't wait to see the the frst test flight. It's going to irritate some serious physics geeks. I just came back for a phsics forum from 2005 that said this exact concept would never get off the ground. I look forward to this concept proving them wrong.

Leslie
<a href="http://www.helinetaviation.com">Helinet Aviation</a>
Reply to this comment
(6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

After 5 years, Firefox faces new challenges

Mozilla helped reshape the Web since releasing Firefox 1.0 five years ago. Now it's got a reawakened Microsoft and Google Chrome to reckon with.

There's a map for that: GPS or smartphone?

Almost every handset comes with mapping software these days, but standalone GPS devices are becoming more affordable than ever.