• On TV.com: Dollhouse CANCELED, What Went Wrong?
February 22, 2008 5:00 AM PST

Why don't video recorders have HDMI inputs?--Ask the Editors

by John P. Falcone
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 26 comments

Toshiba D-R550 back panel

DVD recorders have HDMI out, but not HDMI in. Why the disparity?

(Credit: Crutchfield)

CNET reader "deesmac" asks:

Why doesn't a DVD recorder have an HDMI in, as well as an HDMI out?

It's a great question. High-Definition Multimedia Interface provides the advantage of passing a high-bandwidth all-digital high-definition video and audio signal on a single cable, as opposed to the tangle of component video plus audio cables that were required for HD. (If those terms are Greek to you, check out the connectivity section of the CNET TV Buying Guide.) HDMI is now the standard connector for HDTVs and all of the HD-capable components that connect to them--DVD players and recorders, DVRs, game consoles, Blu-ray and HD DVD players, and even camcorders and PCs. But all of those are video sources that only have HDMI outputs. You'll find HDMI inputs only on AV receivers, HDMI switchers, and--of course--TVs. So, why the disparity?

Not surprisingly, the dearth of HDMI inputs on recording devices is by design. The HDMI specification includes a copy-protection scheme known as High-Definition Copy Protection. So to use HDMI (and get the snazzy HDMI certification logo on your device), manufacturers need to ensure that their products are HDCP-compliant. That pretty much means that HDMI inputs are limited to display devices (TVs) and repeaters (AV receivers and switchers). Those repeaters are so-called "passthrough" devices--they can do little more than pass the HD video signal onto the next device (invariably, the TV). But, by definition, that HDCP-encoded video signal is designed to be unrecordable. That's why there are no recorders with an HDMI input. (You won't find HDMI inputs on Slingbox products for the same reason.)

So what's the alternative? Recorders with component video inputs are few and far between: Philips had component-in on its otherwise lackluster DVD recorders in years past, as did Sony on at least one model--but both companies have since dropped the feature. The upcoming Hauppauge video encoder supposedly can accept and process 1080p video via its component inputs. Likewise, several Slingbox models (as well as competing placeshifting products from Sony, Monsoon/HAVA, and Pinnacle) can accept component video--including HD streams--and pass it through to a TV or AV receiver. However, for recording you're pretty much stuck either with "closed box" HD DVRs or utilizing the so-called analog hole: the composite or S-Video output from your DVR, cable, or satellite box will still output an analog video signal--not in high-definition, of course--that's easily recordable. Which is why they're the only two inputs you'll find on your DVD recorder. (Speaking of which: make sure you use S-Video in--the quality is noticeably better than composite.)

The irony here, as usual, is that honest users who just want more convenience, better quality, and fewer wires are the losers--even as digital piracy remains as rampant as ever (thanks to PC-based recording, not set-top recorders). Still, don't expect Hollywood studios or electronics manufacturers to change their tune on this one. For the same reason, I wouldn't hold my breath for a set-top Blu-ray recorder in North America anytime soon (despite the fact that they've long been available in Japan).

That's the [relatively] quick answer. But if I'm wrong, it certainly wouldn't be the first time. If anybody knows of a recorder with an HDMI input (or even a component input), let us known of your discovery by commenting below.

Note: This post has been updated to include a reference to older Philips and Sony DVD recorders that offered component video inputs (thanks, Wes#1 and Matt).

John P. Falcone covers home theater and network entertainment products. He's been writing for CNET since 2002.
Recent posts from Crave
Hands-on with Ilford's Gold Silk inkjet paper
Fancy a free phone?
Inside CNET Labs Podcast 71: 'Very' good at counting!
Digital City Podcast 60: Attack of Cyber Monday!
How the Grinch iPhone game stole my $1.99
Project with the powerful LG Expo
Dell brings Chrome OS to its Netbook
Get 'Mass Effect' (PC) for $4.95
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (26 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
As Close as You'll Get
by Wilund February 22, 2008 6:10 AM PST
About as close as you're going to get to recording any hd source is the Intensity card manufactured by Black Magic. It's the cheapest hdmi capture solution you'll find on the market (for now) but it requires a fairly beefy computer to support its technology and a pci express slot.

It's not a terrible solution, but as far as convenience it has a bit to be desired.
Reply to this comment
As Close as You'll Get
by Wilund February 22, 2008 6:10 AM PST
About as close as you're going to get to recording any hd source is the Intensity card manufactured by Black Magic. It's the cheapest hdmi capture solution you'll find on the market (for now) but it requires a fairly beefy computer to support its technology and a pci express slot.

It's not a terrible solution, but as far as convenience it has a bit to be desired.
Reply to this comment
There are component inputs on some DVD recorders.
by Wes#1 February 22, 2008 7:20 AM PST
I used to have a Philips DVDR985 DVD recorder that had component inputs. Yes, inputs. This was not HD, of course, and the inputs only accepted an interlaced (non-progressive) signal.

That said, the DVDR985 recorder was a finicky pile of junk, like other Philips DVD equipment I've encountered. It stopped working after about 6 months and I could never get decent support from Philips (they employ clueless thick-accented phone operators off-shore reading scripts) for this DVD recorder, as well as Philips DVD player I bought. The DVDR985 is now a worthless doorstop. I'll never have another Philips-anything in my house and would not endorse buying a Philips machine just to get component input.

But I digress... I believe Philips has had component inputs on several of their recorders; other brands may (hopefully) also, but I'm sure there are restrictions such as 480i-only. Component-in is going to provide a cleaner recorded signal than S-video, and would be preferred if your camcorder (or PC) provides an output for recording this way to a DVD recorder.
Reply to this comment
In defense of Phillips
by Larsd01 February 26, 2008 8:48 PM PST
They DO make great electric razors....
There are component inputs on some DVD recorders.
by Wes#1 February 22, 2008 7:20 AM PST
I used to have a Philips DVDR985 DVD recorder that had component inputs. Yes, inputs. This was not HD, of course, and the inputs only accepted an interlaced (non-progressive) signal.

That said, the DVDR985 recorder was a finicky pile of junk, like other Philips DVD equipment I've encountered. It stopped working after about 6 months and I could never get decent support from Philips (they employ clueless thick-accented phone operators off-shore reading scripts) for this DVD recorder, as well as Philips DVD player I bought. The DVDR985 is now a worthless doorstop. I'll never have another Philips-anything in my house and would not endorse buying a Philips machine just to get component input.

But I digress... I believe Philips has had component inputs on several of their recorders; other brands may (hopefully) also, but I'm sure there are restrictions such as 480i-only. Component-in is going to provide a cleaner recorded signal than S-video, and would be preferred if your camcorder (or PC) provides an output for recording this way to a DVD recorder.
Reply to this comment
In defense of Phillips
by Larsd01 February 26, 2008 8:48 PM PST
They DO make great electric razors....
Why would you need HDMI or component inputs?
by gregbair February 22, 2008 6:36 PM PST
Why would you when the DVD recorder can't record in anything above 480p? That doesn't make sense. Even an upconverting DVD recorder records in SD then upconverts on playback.

I see your point about why they don't (HDCP and all), but why do they need it?
Reply to this comment
Because even at 480 lines, component is superior
by Wes3000 February 23, 2008 9:13 PM PST
in quality to S-video and composite. It's all in the color seperation that component (red, green, blue) provides, along with lower noise. A component copy of a standard DVD or DV tape, or hi-8, will look far closer to the original than S-video.
Why would you need HDMI or component inputs?
by gregbair February 22, 2008 6:36 PM PST
Why would you when the DVD recorder can't record in anything above 480p? That doesn't make sense. Even an upconverting DVD recorder records in SD then upconverts on playback.

I see your point about why they don't (HDCP and all), but why do they need it?
Reply to this comment
Because even at 480 lines, component is superior
by Wes3000 February 23, 2008 9:13 PM PST
in quality to S-video and composite. It's all in the color seperation that component (red, green, blue) provides, along with lower noise. A component copy of a standard DVD or DV tape, or hi-8, will look far closer to the original than S-video.
Japan set-top Blu-ray recorder?
by tebz1123 February 23, 2008 9:06 AM PST
Let's say I had the means to procure a Japan set-top Blu-ray recorder. Would would be the limitations of using it here in the US? Would it even be possible?
Reply to this comment
Japan set-top Blu-ray recorder?
by tebz1123 February 23, 2008 9:06 AM PST
Let's say I had the means to procure a Japan set-top Blu-ray recorder. Would would be the limitations of using it here in the US? Would it even be possible?
Reply to this comment
So, what are we mere mortals to do?
by JimOD February 25, 2008 9:41 AM PST
I have been taping football games on my old VCRs (Mitsubishi). When I am taping, I can edit them "on the fly" to remove the commercials by simply pausing the record function when the commercial begins, backing up a few frames and continuing the recording from that edit point. If I want to make a DVD of the game I can then just copy the finished (or edited) tape to DVD.

This brings up 3 questions:

1. Am I correct (as I assume) that this recording method would be impossible on a DVR recorder? and

2. When we move to all High-Def Broadcast, how is one to record the HD broadcast? and then

3. While recording in HD, how will one be able to edit out the commercials "on the fly" (so to speak) while maintaining all the HD qualities of the broadcast?

Does anybody out there make a DVR that can do this? Or, will I continue to be stuck in the dark ages with my VCRs and analog signals from the dreaded cable company?
Reply to this comment
the answers
by jpfalcone March 18, 2008 9:44 AM PDT
@ Jim--here are the answers as I see them:

1. True DVRs would simply pause the live stream, so yes--it would be impossible to ride the pause button to edit out commercials on a DVR.

2. HD broadcasts can be recorded on DVD recorders with built-in ATSC tuners, although the recording will not be in high-def. To record in HD, you'll either need a DVR (no commercial editing) or a more niche solution, such as a Windows Media Center PC or something such as the Gefen HDMI Recorder:
http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2008-03/gefen-dvr-records-via-hdmi/

3. While recording in HD, it'll be extremely tough to edit out the commercials on the fly. You'll need one of the specialty options listed above.

If any readers have any better suggestions or options, please respond below.
by EdNowak August 27, 2009 9:58 PM PDT
I don't know why you'd want to make a recording without commercials on a DVR since it's a trivial thing to skip through commercials when you're watching a show from your DVR. This commercial skipping is certainly easier than what you go through to make a commercial-less VCR tape. But if you still really want to make a commercial-less VCR tape, then you could employ the very same technique you use now, but you'd be recording from a DVR playback rather than live TV. Or you could keep the VCR running continuously while you skip through the commercials on your DVR, but the VCR tape would pick up the jumps. (My Tivo skips in 30-second increments. I can skip through 4 minutes of commercials in perhaps 3 or 4 seconds.)
So, what are we mere mortals to do?
by JimOD February 25, 2008 9:41 AM PST
I have been taping football games on my old VCRs (Mitsubishi). When I am taping, I can edit them "on the fly" to remove the commercials by simply pausing the record function when the commercial begins, backing up a few frames and continuing the recording from that edit point. If I want to make a DVD of the game I can then just copy the finished (or edited) tape to DVD.

This brings up 3 questions:

1. Am I correct (as I assume) that this recording method would be impossible on a DVR recorder? and

2. When we move to all High-Def Broadcast, how is one to record the HD broadcast? and then

3. While recording in HD, how will one be able to edit out the commercials "on the fly" (so to speak) while maintaining all the HD qualities of the broadcast?

Does anybody out there make a DVR that can do this? Or, will I continue to be stuck in the dark ages with my VCRs and analog signals from the dreaded cable company?
Reply to this comment
the answers
by jpfalcone March 18, 2008 9:44 AM PDT
@ Jim--here are the answers as I see them:

1. True DVRs would simply pause the live stream, so yes--it would be impossible to ride the pause button to edit out commercials on a DVR.

2. HD broadcasts can be recorded on DVD recorders with built-in ATSC tuners, although the recording will not be in high-def. To record in HD, you'll either need a DVR (no commercial editing) or a more niche solution, such as a Windows Media Center PC or something such as the Gefen HDMI Recorder:
http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2008-03/gefen-dvr-records-via-hdmi/

3. While recording in HD, it'll be extremely tough to edit out the commercials on the fly. You'll need one of the specialty options listed above.

If any readers have any better suggestions or options, please respond below.
by MaxxFordham June 2, 2008 10:23 PM PDT
1. We're NOT going to be suddenly switching to all-HD TV broadcasts. There is a switch to all-DIGITAL TV broadcasts that will happen in February next year, but this is not just HD. Unfortunately, plenty of shows will still be stuck in SD quality by then.

2. So you're recording to standard VHS and THEN to DVD? I wouldn't recommend that, because you're just lowering the quality of your video by doing that. Your video has a VHS-quality bottleneck if you do that. If you would record to your DVDs directly from your TV source (as with a standalone DVD recorder), then you'll maintain DVD-quality picture, and you can in fact pause the standalone DVD recorder just like a VCR. Not only that, but some allow you to just record straight through and then do split-edits to remove the commercial blocks between show parts (especially those DVD recorders with hard disks).

3. As for recording HD to removable media, read the above comments for the current disappointing answers.
Reply to this comment
by cedrictimmy November 9, 2008 10:01 AM PST
Very distressing, that you cannot record from an HDMI source, as there is lots of good stuff now on the satellite which is broadcast in HD and which my Canal+ Decoder puts out in HDMI.

But perhaps there is a workaround.

I have found a device called a

"HDMI/DVI Scaler". A box which costs about $230 which converts HDMI to DVI and vice versa.

http://www.hdstep.com/Atlona-HDMI-DVI-Scaler-with-Analog-Digital-Audio-p-17507.html

Now, could I use the output from my Canal+ decoder in HDMI, pipe it into this converter, and get DVI output to put into a high quality HDMI capable recorder? Is this a useful avenue to be pursuing ?

Second question: I would like to network the recorder so that I can grab stuff I have recorded and store the files on a server on my local network. It seems very rare to have an ethernet connection on the recorders, although in my initial research I have found one that has one, the Pioneer DVR-LX61D. (Unfortunately it does not seem to have DVI input ... ) In any case, is this a usual use of the Ethernet connection on these devices, should I find an acceptable one? Is the disk readable (or writeable for that matter) from the network ?

Many thanks for your help.

Jon Cooper
Etretat
France
Reply to this comment
by sg71music February 1, 2009 5:48 PM PST
HELP! I do not have an HDMI tv. But I do have a digital box so I can receive digital tv.
I use my video recorder with progressive scan to dub from VHS to DVD and record from tv to DVD.
Can I use a new JVC DRMV79B video recorder that has HDMI ?

Please reply. Many thanks
Reply to this comment
by malos333 October 5, 2009 5:57 AM PDT
that sux for many legit users i have a sony hd cam with hdmi i want to get a blu ray recorder for 2 reasons 1 to record tv shows when im not home onto as i dont have any recorder at this time and to record blu ray movies from my cam into that as my pc is slow and would be cheaper just to get a blu ray player rather then buying a blu ray recorder and a new fast pc .....

do those tools in hollywood really think doing this will prevent any piracy NO cause its all done on pc`s not players on tv ....
Reply to this comment
by ukndoit October 15, 2009 3:49 AM PDT
99% of the time I get a "cannot record: copy-protected"...
sometimes it does work then when it tries to write it to the disk it then says "Cannot record: copy-protected", so it seems to only work 1% of the time. It does not matter what I try to record off my dvr, live tv works a little better, but I still don't get to record much, even commercials!!

So I think that it would not matter if it was an HDMI input or not, copy protection can be read by a slow input or fast and better quality one.
Reply to this comment
by wsbnradio October 18, 2009 3:26 PM PDT
If copying Hollywood DVDs are as rampid as noted, there is a very simple method put a stop to this activity. Frankly, I know a good deal of people both family and friends and I do not know a single one that copys copyrighted movies or whatever. Prices, for pre-recorded DVDs, have come down to a tolerable level for the average movie watcher; however, even a further decrease in the cost would eliminate those that find it still necessary to copy. When the cost of the DVD + cost of software + time + not having a neat folder for the movie library + the loss of high quality recordings and the loss of a well made disc lable = it is not worth copying a pre-recorded DVD. Hollywood pays out all the funds to find a way to stop copying pre-recorded DVDs and shortly after they come out with their allegedly uncrackable method, the uncrackable is cracked. The the process starts all over again. It sure seems to me to lower the price sufficiently where it is not worth the cost and effort for the copying of DVDs will either stop or greatly squash it down. I much prefer the impressive folder, high quality pictures and sound and all the extras than to add a inferior copied version of movies to be viewed on my 55" HD plasma television with a great sounding audio system is just out of the question. Hollywood just needs to get smart and make it not worth the effort to copy a movie. I have seen where record number of blockbuster Hollywood (or any wood where-ever) movies have had record sales. In a nut shell it comes down to Hollywood greed to want more and an individual's budget that does not include pre-recorded DVD movies that are rather expensive....especially blu-ray movies. The question, what came first high costly movies or the criminal?
Reply to this comment
by lecochonbleu November 12, 2009 6:11 PM PST
It's such a shame that it has not been possible to record video signals by HDMI input. Naturally I'm thinking of the great benefit of standard definition including D.V.D resolution, and also 720p, home video clips upscaled on D.V.D. upscalers or Blu Ray upscaling to 1080p. It's a real waste that it can not be recorded somehow and burned to disc, even if some very good conversion program would be needed for a digital file. People would love their V.G.A. home clips much more.
Reply to this comment
by lecochonbleu November 12, 2009 6:14 PM PST
... continued from comment. It's only now that home video editing software such as ArcSoft's Total Media Extreme and CyberLink's Power Director (v.8 Ultra) are getting popular with making upgraded resolution copies of standard definition home video - making these closer to H.D.

If it were also as simple as playing the blu-rays or D.V.D.s written in the past and recording the result, to Full H.D. resolution, it would be a great thing.
by BDraper62 November 25, 2009 1:15 PM PST
I found that the Astar 2100 DVD recorder (stand alone model) does not allow HDMI input, but does upconvert S-Vid signal to HD. It also doesn't suffer from copy protection issues. Unfortunately the hardware does suffer from a short life span and is no longer available on the market.
Reply to this comment
(26 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

S.F. hacker space: Heaven for the DIY set?

The Noisebridge hacker space offers sewing and Mandarin classes, soldering workshops, Internet-controlled front door access, and a server room with no door.
• Photos: Circuits, code, community

The browser battles go on and on

roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.