• On CHOW: Sexy vampire party
January 28, 2008 4:00 AM PST

Skyfire brings desktop-quality browsing to your phone

by Rafe Needleman
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 5 comments

The twice-yearly new product orgy called Demo 08 kicks off tomorrow, but we have a few previews of presenting companies we wanted to write up before the CEOs take the stage. First up: SkyFire, a browser for smartphones.

CEO Nitin Bhandari told me that his goal with Skyfire is to do "true desktop rendering," including media support, on a tiny screen.

Skyfire's CEO showed me a live demo of desktop Flash video running on a Windows smartphone. (Screen capture from Skype session.)

Bhandari showed me a demo during our Skype call, and it appears that his browser does just what he intended. Displaying a sports site, Skyfire played the video and audio on it very well. The browser also recognizes text and reflows it into a phone-size column when you zoom into it, so you don't have to scroll side-to-side to read.

The technical trick of Skyfire is that it's a proxy browser. The Skyfire app itself isn't a full browser. Instead, big Skyfire servers elsewhere process Web pages, including all the media and browser formats--like Flash, Java, and Ajax--that a normal desktop browser would handle but that most phones can't. Then it streams data to phones, which the mobile half of Skyfire displays. To the end user, it looks like a browser, but the mobile app is just one part of the product.

This means that Skyfire can do things on mobile phones that mobile browsers, including Safari and Opera cannot, at least not without bogging down the phone. The danger is that the Skyfire servers themselves will bog down, because of over-use, and ruin the experience for mobile users. This is the experience I had with Micrsoft's Deepfish, a proxy browser project we covered last year and that appears to have gone dormant. Bhandari told me the service is "built to scale," and that "once at escape velocity," the company can plug in additional servers to handle a growing user base. He would not reveal the technical underpinnings of Skyfire beyond that.

The escape velocity that Bhandari refers to includes not just user uptake, but a revenue model, and it's on that second small detail that my confidence in this product begins to wane. Bhandari may "monetize user activity," which means selling ads, and he also hopes to generate revenues from carriers that want a competitor to Apple's iPhone browsing experience. The first revenue model is flawed--in-browser ads on a tiny screen will be annoying and hard to sell. The second model is sound, but incredibly difficult. Many mobile app companies have withered and died while waiting for a good carrier deal. And in this case, the carriers are going to need extra convincing, because supporting Skyfire means running or paying for a bank of proxy servers.

Although I think that proxied browsing is the right solution for mobile devices, I am not convinced that there's a solid business behind it.

Skyfire will go into public beta in a few weeks for Windows smartphones. Other platforms will follow. You should be able to register for the beta this week at the site.

Originally posted at Webware
Rafe Needleman writes about start-ups, new technologies, and Web 2.0 products, as editor of CNET's Webware. E-mail Rafe.
Recent posts from Crave
BlackBerry Curve 8520 coming to AT&T
Get a 46-inch Sony LCD for $800
Killer deals on BlackBerry, Droid, and Palm Pixi
This week in Crave: The boxed-in edition
Ricky Gervais helps reveal pain of cell phone salesmen
Indecent Exposure 68: Inky extents
Apple fixes AirPort problems marring video playback on 27-inch iMacs
iPhone: The board gamer's paradise
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Spykedjadedragon January 29, 2008 4:27 AM PST
This is what's so annoying...why don't they just...oh I don't know, CHARGE us for it?! I mean, I like free things just like the next person but if you have a solid product, people would be willing to buy it! I know I'd pay for something like this...but now instead we're going to have to be bombarded with ads as usual and then who knows if this will be able to stick around...
Reply to this comment
by scooter329 January 29, 2008 5:14 AM PST
I agree with Spyked. I would pay for this, and others who wouldn't could opt to receive ads. And it is annoying because it's not just this product. Why aren't we all watching tv on-line with the choice to either pay with no ads or free with ads like the networks already offer for some shows.

Until I can surf on my phone with skyfire or something like it I won't phone surf at all. But, I will jump ship from my current carrier to somebody else if they offer a good browsing experience.
by albmaster February 2, 2008 8:15 AM PST
I bet the guy could make more $$ by ingesting ads to he's software then selling it(where ppl might hesitate on paying for it).
Thats one of the major reasons that most softwares come free but w/ ads att. to them.
If I could i would get into the software and get the ads out of there, thats an option since the software is free :).
There's allways ways to get around as long as you got something to work with in the first place.
by Maximuspowers May 30, 2008 5:05 PM PDT
I have the beta version of the browser and I think it is great. I would definitely pay for this. I cant wait for the final version.
Reply to this comment
by sudhir_82 June 13, 2008 7:31 AM PDT
Hi
Reply to this comment
(5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

A CNET Conversation with Eric Schmidt

CNET's Tom Krazit and Molly Wood sit down with Google CEO Eric Schmidt to discuss the future of Android, the Chrome OS, the problem of real-time search indexing, and more.

Verizon tests sending RIAA copyright notices

The No. 2 phone company, known for its reluctance to intervene in antipiracy cases, strikes an agreement to forward copyright notices on behalf of the music industry.