• On CHOW: Sexy vampire party
December 20, 2007 2:51 PM PST

'Consumer Reports' rates the best cell phones

by Kent German
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 5 comments

Consumer Reports has put out its regular list of the best cell phones and carriers. Though this time around, I'm more in agreement with the results, like last year there were a few phones on the list I didn't love quite as much. And I'm surprised again as to just how many older models are included. Given Consumer Reports' lead time, keep in mind that none of the phones introduced in the last couple months (such as the LG Voyager) are on the list, but by and large it's quite comprehensive.

The leader of the pack...vroom, vroom.

(Credit: CNET Networks)

Out of the 40 phones that Consumer Reports included in its testing, T-Mobile's Motorola V195 took top honor with a score of 68 out of 100. On the whole it was a solid handset with dependable call quality, even though it is a year and a half old. We also liked that it was one of the first phones without a camera to offer Bluetooth. Second place went to AT&T's Samsung Sync SGH-A707 (another 2006 model) with a score of 67, while AT&T's Sony Ericsson W810i secured third place with a score of 65. I'm a bit mixed on these two. Though the Sync wasn't a bad phone by any means, it certainly wasn't one my favorites. On the other hand, I did approve of the W810i. Finally, on the other end of the list were Verizon's LG VX9400 and Sprint's Motorola ic502, which tied for the bottom spot with 51 points each. We actually liked the V Cast Mobile TV-enabled VX9400 but we concur that the ic502 was a stinker.

When broken out by carrier, Consumer Reports also produced some interesting results. The top three Verizon Wireless models were the G'zOne Type-S (63), the LG Chocolate VX8550 (62), and the Nokia 6315i (61). The Chocolate was a very nice model, and the Type-S is one of the most durable handsets around, but the 6315i (yet another 2006 phone) was just average, in our opinion.

The top Sprint phone was the LG Muziq LX570 (60), the Sanyo Katana DLX (58), and the Sanyo M1 (57). All three of those devices were ranked highly in our tests, though it's too bad the magazine never got around to testing the Motorola Razr2 V9m or the LG Rumor. If it had, it would be interesting to see if those handsets would have swayed the results.

For T-Mobile, the aforementioned V195 took the top spot and was followed by the Nokia 6103 (64) and the Samsung SGH-T629 (61). These models were also decent, but I have to disagree with placing them at the top. Instead, I'd move up the Motorola Rizr Z3 and the Nokia 5300, which received scores of just 60 and 54, respectively. Also, the Moto V195s is a more recent update to the V195.

On the AT&T side, the Motorola Razr2 V9 (64) took third place after the previously mentioned the Sync and W810i. I'd disagree here, too, and would have to boost the Razr2 V9 and the (now discontinued) LG CU500v. I also found it odd that the Apple iPhone didn't make the top AT&T list, until I discovered that Consumer Reports left it for its smartphone rankings.

The best smartphone, or so says Consumer Reports.

(Credit: Corrine Schulze/CNET Netwroks)

To its credit, the iPhone topped the list of the best smartphones with a rating of 64. It was followed by the Palm Treo 755p (63) and the Samsung BlackJack (62). Though the BlackJack was fine, I'd ask why the AT&T Tilt or the Nokia N95 or the Samsung SCH-i760 didn't make the list. Verizon's Motorola Q was the lowest ranked smart phone with just 51 points. We pretty much agreed with that assessment and gave the Q a rating of 6.0.

The biggest surprises came from the magazine's carrier ratings. Verizon Wireless took the top ranking in 16 markets except in Minneapolis where T-Mobile was the winner and in Tampa, Phoenix, and Cleveland, where Alltel won. T-Mobile took second place in 14 of the markets, while poor Sprint ranked at the bottom in all but one. Only in Minneapolis did it take the No. 3 spot bumping AT&T down to last place. And speaking of AT&T, America's largest carrier consistently ranked in in the penultimate spot except in Minneapolis and Dallas, where it was the second-best carrier. Interestingly enough, Consumer Reports said AT&T is "home of the iPhone but trails the better carriers in almost all respects." Our own ratings from CNET readers agree.

Kent German is a senior editor for cell phone reviews at CNET. When he's not testing the newest handsets on the market, he's blogging about cell phone news for Crave. In his On Call column, he answers reader questions and gives his take on the rapidly changing mobile industry. E-mail Kent.
Recent posts from Crave
PressReader brings 1,300 newspapers to your iPhone
Palm Pixi reviewed
The 404 466: Where we dissect a live fanboy
Yes, it's coming: The Boxee Box
Dell's aims Inspiron Zino HD at the living room
Universities reject Kindle over inaccessibility for the blind
Zvox's biggest, best-sounding TV speaker
Guitar Hero III: Legends of Rock (PS3), $18.67
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Smart Phone List
by nnpptt December 20, 2007 5:22 PM PST
How could the Voyager be left off this list? And how is the i760 not ranked higher than the iPhone? What about the Curve?

1) http://comparati.com/890-LG-Voyager-vs-iPhone
2) http://comparati.com/1202-iPhone-vs-Samsung-SCH-i76-
3) http://comparati.com/31-BlackBerry-Curve-vs-iPhone
Reply to this comment
iPhone is better
by bmorrise December 22, 2007 2:58 PM PST
I'll tell you why the i760 isn't ranked higher than the iPhone. The iPhone is better.
About CRs ratings
by Timmeh71 December 20, 2007 11:48 PM PST
Reply to this comment
Never trust consumer reports
by AXG December 21, 2007 2:05 PM PST
Consumer reports does not know how to evaluate anything, be it phones or cars. Consumer reports is about best value for money. They would give higher ratings to cheaper stuff even though superior models are available at higher cost. Use your own judgment, evaluate yourself or rely on CNET or other user's opinions. Never go by Consumer Reports. Everytime I bought a CR best rated product, I got poor stuff.
Reply to this comment
NEVER trust Consumer Reports?
by Mickey December 22, 2007 7:51 PM PST
NEVER trust Consumer Reports? What sort of nonsense is that? And you criticize them for championing getting the most for your money?

Look, Einstein, instead of saying, "Never trust or go by Consumer Reports", why not say, "Check out several reviews by various groups like cnet, Consumer Reports, etc. before you buy. Maybe even physically looking at the product in a showroom would be helpful, hunh?

And may I say that I have followed Consumer Reports advice many, many times and have never been disappointed.

Touché

Lloyd
Reply to this comment
(5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

As alternative energy grows, NIMBY greens

With more renewable energy projects trying to come online, the country grapples with the balance between local land use and a national push for clean energy.

Google to remake programming with Go

A Unix co-creator is among those behind a language Google hopes will speed computers and programming. Today, Go becomes open-source software.