• On GameSpot: Handheld Xbox coming...eventually.
November 19, 2007 2:26 PM PST

Which $1,000 laptop should I buy?

by Michelle Thatcher
Five laptops that cost $1,000 or less.

How do the $1,000 laptops stack up?

I used to cringe when folks asked me to recommend a laptop that cost less than $1,000. Granted, there have been laptops at that price for a few years now, but they were generally chunky cases stocked with generations-old components and low-resolution screens--not exactly anything I'd feel good about recommending for use as a primary computer.

Imagine my surprise when computer manufacturers responded to my call for $1,000 laptops with some downright Crave-worthy systems. I expected to receive only 15.4-inch systems, because the larger case provides more room for engineers to work and keeps costs down; but I also found two 14.1-inch systems that didn't break our budget. I expected to receive cases stocked with previous-generation Pentium or Celeron CPUs; on the contrary, all but one of our review units included current-generation processors, graphics, and chipsets. I expected the cases to be leftovers from last year's crop of new laptops; instead, many in our roundup share the same case design as their more-expensive brethren.

One area where my expectations were met: performance. None of the laptops in this roundup sped through our performance benchmarks. But if I'm buying a $1,000 laptop, I'm not expecting to use it for gaming or video editing.

In the end, we were able to round up sub-$1,000 configurations from Fujitsu, Gateway, Lenovo, Sony, and Toshiba. Which ones did I like best? The answer is after the break.

One of the highest-scoring systems in this roundup, the $899 Gateway M-1618 was also my personal favorite. Its case--with a glossy, subtly patterned finish and brushed-metal accents--is the same as you'd find on the company's higher-end systems. Its display is simply beautiful, and the M-1618 is remarkably slim for a low-cost system. In fact, the slim form factor ultimately gave the Gateway an edge over the Sony VAIO CR120 (the other high-scoring system in this roundup). I simply loved having a broad, bright display and comfortable keyboard in such a compact case. The display could be a deal-breaker for some, however: its glossy coating is among the most reflective in this roundup. Also, the AMD Turion 64 X2 processor in the M-1618 posted some of the lowest performance scores in this roundup, though I found it adequate for Web surfing, word processing, and watching movies.

The $1,000 Sony VAIO CR120 was my other favorite. The 5.3-pound system with a 14.1-inch screen is certainly one of the most portable laptops in this roundup, and I'd venture to say it's the most expensive-looking. It has a shimmery indigo lid, silver interior, and chrome detailing, plus pulsating LED lights beneath the case (which can, of course, be turned off). Its flat-top keys required some getting used to, but typing was comfortable overall. Its glossy high-resolution display produces fewer reflections than the Gateway's, though it's still quite prone to glare. With a current-generation Core 2 Duo processor, the VAIO CR120 posted high performance scores, though it was slightly hobbled by its single gigabyte of RAM. It was also one of the most egregious offenders when it came to preinstalled crapware--which may be the reason its price is so low.

When I embarked on this roundup, I knew I had to include Lenovo. Though the Lenovo 3000 line is directed primarily at small businesses, it has long been one of the best deals going if you want to buy a laptop built on the latest Intel processors and platforms. We looked at the 14.1-inch version of the Lenovo 3000 N200 ($984) and were pleased, if not exactly blown away. It's a little chunkier than the VAIO CR120, and it lacks the media features found on the more entertainment-oriented systems in this roundup. But it was among one of the better performers and has a slew of features (fingerprint reader, Lenovo Care support utility, and so on) that will appeal to users who want a straightforward machine for the home office.

The Toshiba Satellite A215-S7437 has an awful lot in common with the Gateway M-1618: both laptops cost $899, both feature 15.4-inch displays, and both incorporate AMD Turion 64 X2 processors. However, the Toshiba is larger than the Gateway, and (worse) posted the shortest battery life of all five systems in this roundup. Its low price also seems to owe something to crapware. We will say, however, that we like the Satellite's display; Toshiba's glossy screen finish produces only slight reflections, effectively balancing the demands of image quality with the demands of onscreen reading. The speakers on the Satellite A215-S7437 are also the best laptop speakers we've heard in a long time.

Alas, someone has to come in last, and in this case it's the $999 Fujitsu LifeBook A6110. It's not that this 15.4-incher has so many flaws--though its battery life left much to desire--but that its chunky case and average performance were underwhelming, particularly relative to other systems in its price range. What the LifeBook A6110 offers above the competition are comfort, with its full-size keyboard and broad, beautiful 15.4-inch display, and flexibility, with room for lots of peripherals and multiple expansion-card choices.

If you've read this far, you're surely wondering about the elephant in the room--two elephants, in fact: HP and Dell. Unfortunately both tech giants were unable to send us review systems that cost less than $1,000 in time for our deadline. However, we did some shopping on their sites to get a sense of how they'd stack up. First, we configured an HP Pavilion dv6500t with identical components to the Fujitsu LifeBook A6110 (1.5GHz Intel Core 2 Duo T5250 processor, 2GB of RAM, Intel X3100 graphics, 160GB hard drive, 802.11a/b/g Wi-Fi, Webcam, and DVD burner) for $829. Though we haven't run this system through our benchmark testing, we imagine its performance would be similar to the Fujitu's--and we like the HP's case design.

Things were rockier on the Dell side, where we found a $968 (after $200 instant savings) Inspiron 1520 that included a 1.5GHz Intel Core 2 Duo T5250 processor, Nvidia 8400M GS graphics, a 250GB hard drive, 802.11g Wi-Fi, and a DVD burner--but we couldn't get more than 1GB or RAM, nor could we add a Webcam, without going over the $1,000 budget. The slightly smaller Inspiron 1420 includes nearly identical components and 2GB of RAM, but we had to sacrifice the DVD burner to keep the price at $999. Adding the DVD burner pops the price up closer to $1,100.

Overall, it would seem that the Holy Grail of laptop buying--a decent, attractively design laptop with a solid feature set for less than $1,000--is finally within reach. Even better, you can choose among several laptops that meet those criteria. Happy bargain hunting!

Michelle Thatcher has been reviewing technology products for nearly a decade. Her current focus is laptop reviews, with some kitchen gadgetry and Web 2.0 thrown in for good measure.
Recent posts from Crave
Sponge absorbs 180 times its weight (in toxic sludge)
Prizefight: Motorola Droid vs. iPhone 3GS
Accessories for the iPod Touch
Beware the Blue Yeti
Smartphone users, keep complaining
Two new remote Webcams: Mole and Vue
MP3 Insider 168: Inspired by the uninspiring
WiiWaa: Fun for kids, coma for animal controller
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (12 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
But... but.. for only 100.00 bucks more than 1,000
by ibookfast November 19, 2007 4:11 PM PST
You could get an awesome machine from Apple.. specs:
13.3" glossy wide screen
2.0GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
1GB memory (upgradable to 4GB)
80GB hard drive
Combo drive
built-in iSight web cam
great software suite (iLife)
Up to 6 hours battery life
5 pounds
Apple Remote; full-size keyboard; scrolling trackpad
Two USB 2.0 ports, one FireWire 400 port
Combined optical digital/headphone out, combined optical digital/audio line
in, microphone, speakers
Mini-DVI video out with support for DVI, VGA, S-video, and composite video
output via adapters (sold separately)
Lower Total Cost of Ownership, i.e., no anti-virus needed, (I know
inconceivable, yet true)
Only computer on the market that can boot all 3 major OSes.
Reply to this comment
Er.. Ok...
by Wolfie2k5 November 21, 2007 5:14 AM PST
For $100 more, you get a smaller screen and a smaller hard drive. Only TWO USB ports...? Most of those laptops come with that and a second pair for a total of 4. And many come with a firewire port. Of course, why would anyone really need a firewire port is a mystery. With the exception of the camcorder industry, Firewire's pretty much an extinct bit of technology. Unless you've got an ancient 1st gen iPod...

Given the smallish screen, you'd almost want an external monitor. Ok. I'll give you the HD video connector. That's nice. Then again, unless you're watching HD movies, a standard analog port generally will do more than well enough.

As far as TCO goes... Exactly how do you figure it's lower? Because you don't have to spend $50 for an Antivirus app...? Come on. Give us a break. $50 per year for an antivirus isn't THAT big a deal. Especially when the prices of the laptops reviewed are at least $200 to $300 LESS than the cost of the Mac. Especially when there are free AV apps (AVG, Avast - to name two) out there. That little fact kinda derails your train of thought.

So exactly how many OS's do you think the average guy is going to really ever NEED? Seriously. Unless you're a travelling web developer who needs to test stuff on mutiple platforms or someone who just wants to brag about how geeky he can be, ONE OS is usually enough.

So, what, exactly was your point again?
The world uses Windows.
by Kev50027 November 19, 2007 5:19 PM PST
Nobody wants a bottom of the line Apple. They're slow enough as it is. She was talking about laptops, not craptops.
Reply to this comment
Is that the best you could do?
by ibookfast November 19, 2007 8:01 PM PST
hmm, I see we have a Winfanboi. Respect.

Macs can run Windows natively, according to some better than Window OEM
machines can. The brand new version of OS X (129US$ Pro version-the only
one available) puts Vista to shame, for half the price of the Windows
"equivalent." Apparently many Microsoft based IT departments are shunning
the new upgrade.

Because Macs have *Nix under the hood, its security is smarter. Decades ago
folks working on Unix anticipated computers networking. A couple of days
ago it was officially announced that Mac OS X Leopard and Mac OS X Server
Leopard were awarded UNIX 03 certification.

A simple way of illustrating the difference... Windows is like The Titanic as
Apple is like a hydrofoil.

Apple leads in costumer service satisfaction, and a very successful brick &
mortar presence. Combine that with interactive elegance and nice form, while
it just works for you and not the reverse, you've arrived in relative computer
nirvana.

Windows PCs are for hard-core gamers and hobbyists/tinkerers.

Macs almost run as easily as toasters... :)

p.s. Macbooks got a hardware speed bump last week.
Reply to this comment
just stay away from the sony
by takemout November 20, 2007 5:53 AM PST
i hear about alot of people returning the sony labtops. i think the gateway or toshiba are the best choices. it just seems like vista runs faster on the AMD machines. if you running vista just put in as much RAM as possible. I have a gateway laptop and upgraded it from 1GB to 2GB and it made a huge difference in the performance.
Reply to this comment
What about other Dells?
by johnrobie November 20, 2007 6:18 AM PST
I was thinking of the Vostro or Latitude line. They're not to prettiest, but they're the only ones Dell is offering with XP - From what I've seen/heard, Vista looks like a bloated and unnecesary pain.

And it looks like they have 2 models for around 850.
Reply to this comment
Forget that!
by doneflop November 20, 2007 6:42 AM PST
I would spend the Extra $100 and buy a mac. Its faster and has best OS.
Reply to this comment
Apple(s) of my eye
by pubmat November 20, 2007 2:44 PM PST
I agree with many on here...Apple is the best, by a wide margin. I have an Imac,
and wouldnt trade it for 10 Vaios. The only complaint I have with Apple
is....could they put more hard drive memory on it for doo doo's sake? 80 gigs
doesn NOT cut it for a 1000 laptop when some of these on here have 250GB.
Apple...come on and pony up on MORE GIGS.
Reply to this comment
Apple does not make a low end machine
by oldmacdev November 20, 2007 5:19 PM PST
Check the specs. While all the other sub $1000 machines use last year's Napa
chip set and a T5250 or T7100 (in the Sony) processor, the Macbook uses the
2007 Santa Rosa chip set and either the T7300 or T7500 processor. The Apple
has a 800MHz FSB, supports 4G of RAM and has a newer graphics processor.
The base Macbook may be available for $100 off for black Friday IF Apple
discounts as they have in the past.
Reply to this comment
..but for $200 less! ...
by Tank252ca November 21, 2007 7:12 AM PST
Well, for $800 ($300 less than your Mac) I just got an HP Pavilion with:
15.4" screen (bigger than yours)
1.9 GHz AMD Turion 64 (slower than yours)
2GB RAM (twice as much as yours)
160GB hard drive (twice as big as yours)
Combo drive (mine has Lightscribe support)
Built in WebCam (check)
Great software suite (everything we need, anyway)
Battery life not rated (6 cell Li)
6 lbs (1 lb heavier than yours)
HP remote; standard keyboard; touchpad
3 USB ports (one more than yours); 1 Firewire port
Analogue input / output (headphones); mic; speakers (no digital audio in/out)
VGA, S-Video and composite out (no DVI, but no adapters required)

Looks to me like the HP has much more bang for the buck. Similar performance with double the RAM and disk space and a bigger screen for 27% less money!

And please, lets stop with the lower cost of ownership crap. AVG Antivirus is free and PC Tools Firewall is free, and even Apple recommends AV software. From Apple: "A Mac running with factory settings will protect you from viruses much better than a PC, but it?s never a bad idea to run extra virus and security software." And from Todd Woodward at Symantec:" As I tell my internal and external customers alike, just because there are no file-infecting viruses that can affect Mac OS X now, that doesn't mean there won't be a really nasty one released in the next five minutes."

I love the Macbook Pro, and Apple writes great software, but to get the same features in a Mac still costs considerably more money.
Reply to this comment
Don't ship your money to China or Japan!
by jazzfan1948 November 21, 2007 8:00 AM PST
Yes, I know, most computers are built overseas from overseas components. But why give the profits away, too? Buy from HP, Dell, or Apple (remember, Gateway is now owned by Acer) and keep at least a little spark of life in the US economy!
Reply to this comment
Dell Vostro XP no slacker
by fosterbraun November 21, 2007 8:18 AM PST
Just helped a friend set up his Vostro XP model and was surprised by a) the lack of crapware and b) the measley 512 MB of RAM and c)the cheapo plastic case. Whatever he paid originally it will cost him more $$ to get decent RAM. On the other hand he is a senior citizen who is not willing to walk through the Valley of Vista and is not mezmerized by the alure of Apple. In addition the Vostro runs all the programs he already has which is a huge issue for anyone considering the shift to either Vista or OSX (funny no one is talking about the problems Leopard is having with compatability and security..guess that's only an MS issue!)

I admit, however, that I have Mac envy and would snatch up a MacBook Pro 15" in a heartbeat, if I could come up with the $2,600 that it will really cost when you add service agreements etc. Unfortunately I can only press my nose to the window of the newest Apple outlet in our area and fog it up a bit. Happy Thanksgiving!
Reply to this comment
(12 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

After 5 years, Firefox faces new challenges

Mozilla helped reshape the Web since releasing Firefox 1.0 five years ago. Now it's got a reawakened Microsoft and Google Chrome to reckon with.

There's a map for that: GPS or smartphone?

Almost every handset comes with mapping software these days, but standalone GPS devices are becoming more affordable than ever.