• On GameSpot: So-called 'Halo killer' gets 23 to life
November 3, 2007 5:17 PM PDT

Stanford, CMU robots cross the finish line

by Stefanie Olsen
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 6 comments

ORO GRANDE, Calif.--Three robots finished the DARPA Urban Challenge within the allotted time Saturday, a new milestone in the development of self-driving vehicles.

In the running for the $2 million first prize and $1 million second prize are Stanford University's robotic VW Passat, Virginia Tech's modified Ford Escape Hybrid, and Carnegie Mellon's autonomous Chevrolet Tahoe. These teams finished the urban challenge's three missions within the allotted six hours and without significant problems.

CMU's driverless car, Boss, crossed the finish line a couple of minutes after Stanford's Junior, but the robot started nearly 40 minutes after Stanford.

(Credit: Stefanie Olsen/CNET Networks)

Other teams, including the Ben Franklin Racing Team's robotic Toyota Prius, also completed the course, but it's uncertain whether it crossed the finish line in time given various stops in the race.

DARPA plans to name the winners Sunday after compiling and evaluating all of its data on the race vehicles, including data on their speed and compliance with basic traffic rules. DARPA officials had said that the fastest car wouldn't necessarily win if it didn't pass all of the driving rules.

But DARPA Director Tony Tether said that he hadn't seen anything egregious among the first three finalists.

"We have a winner," Tether said in an interview with CNET News.com here at the former George Air Force Base.

Stanford University's robot car Junior crossed the finish line first, but it's unclear whether it will take first prize like it did in the 2005 Grand Challenge, a 132-mile race across the Nevada desert.

CMU's robot Boss followed Junior across the finish line a couple of minutes later, but Boss had started the race as much as 40 minutes after Junior left the starting gate. It was scheduled to leave the starting gate first early Saturday, but it experienced technical problems involving interference with its Global Positioning System, thanks to a local Jumbotron. So CMU gained significant time throughout its three required missions in the day.

Virginia Tech's team, VictorTango, crossed the finish line third. The team was first to leave the starting gate around 8 a.m. and it completed its first two missions first.

Originally posted at News Blog
Recent posts from Crave
Panasonic updates 3-chip camcorders
Nissan Juke set to debut in New York
preGAME 02: Heavy Rain
On Call: When will we see a new iPhone?
Intel taps student's robot for processor demo
What would you pay for an e-book?
Audio-Technica headphones offer noise cancellation and affordable sound
LG SL80 series LCD TV puts style first
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (6 Comments)
  • prev
  • next
Shouldn't VT be in the headline too?
by atlzif November 4, 2007 4:52 AM PST
The headline seems a bit misleading and biased on this article. Shouldn't it read "Stanford, CMU, VT Robots Cross the Finish Line"?? Be honest and unbiased in your reporting.
Reply to this comment
Not Biased
by magicman73 November 4, 2007 8:57 AM PST
Before you go slamming the writer for biased writing maybe you should learn how their world works. First off, they write the story. The Editors write the headlines. And in all honesty, how "misleading" is the headline because it doesn't mention VT as well? Did that omissions truly prevent you from understanding what the article was about or are you just someone who is involved with VT and you feel left out? I'm really getting sick of people these days who feel it's okay to criticize something they know nothing about.
View reply
CM's vehicle
by dealerthe November 4, 2007 10:34 AM PST
Its a Trailblazer, not a Tahoe, only a $20k mistake.
Reply to this comment
I was there, and 6 robots finished.
by biztechguy November 4, 2007 12:11 PM PST
This article was written in some haste.<br /><br />Magicman73, CNET deserves criticism for getting the facts wrong. And you jumped in to defend them before you checked the facts.<br /><br />Check the status board:<br /><a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.grandchallenge.org/darpauc07/watchtherace/statusboard.html" target="_newWindow">http://www.grandchallenge.org/darpauc07/watchtherace/statusboard.html</a>
Reply to this comment
another difference
by Rick Cavaretti November 4, 2007 4:26 PM PST
So one is a partial gas guzzler and the other one is total gas <br />guzzler.
Reply to this comment
(6 Comments)
  • prev
  • next
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

Google's social side aims for some Buzz

Facebook and Twitter are the darlings of the social-media world, not Google--which hopes to change that with Buzz, betting it can organize your online social life.

Watching the birth of a gaming start-up

Stewart Butterfield and his friends are back at it with a new company. CNET's Daniel Terdiman was given exclusive, behind-the-scenes access as they built it from scratch.