September 7, 2007 12:19 PM PDT

Behold the $860,608 stereo

by Mike Yamamoto
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 6 comments

Clearaudio's 'Statement' turntable

(Credit: Musical Surroundings)

Well that didn't take long. Just after we thought we'd come across one of the weirder pieces of sound equipment seen in awhile, along comes another to beat it out in spades. Not only does this system featured at Berlin's IFA trade show have an exceedingly esoteric design, but it's even more exclusive because of its price: $860,608, to be exact, which makes it the "world's most expensive stereo system" in the estimation of BornRich.

The centerpiece of this monstrosity is the Clearaudio "Statement" turntable pictured here for $137,000, flanked by 5.1 JBL speakers at $68,700 a pair and four Velodyne subwoofers totaling $52,000. The Krell amps alone are worth $163,000, and a Mark Levinson pre-amp is priced at $54,000. Various other components make up the rest of the overall cost.

And here we thought the $150,000 "Transrotor Artus" was expensive; maybe now we'll start seeing it on sale at Costco. In the meantime, ponder this: If the Clearaudio set-up tacked on the "Grand Enigma" audio system, the total price tag would approach $2 million.

Recent posts from Crave
New, terrifying, no-electronics U.S. flight security rules?
Apple's iSlate: What we know for sure
Best hardware and software add-ons for your PC
Kindle is most gifted Amazon item, ever
Android eHow app: Get and share advice on anything
Will recorded music survive the 2010s?
Monitor OSD Quick Guide: (Some of) the ins and outs
So you've got a Zune...now what?
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
I'm bewildered
by moretroops September 7, 2007 5:11 PM PDT
I don't even understand these sound-reproducing contraptions. What IS that?
It plays phonographs, evidently. Why it costs that much? No freakin idea.
None. That might as well be a steam iron.

Here's a suggestion: instead of porn fetishing these items, cnet, why not try
and explain to us viewers, in layman's (idiot's) terms, what makes these
things so expensive, why, and then why we should care.

I have some nice b&ws, rotel gear, etc., and even I don't recognize these
things. You can imagine what it's like for most others.
Reply to this comment
I'm bewildered
by moretroops September 7, 2007 5:11 PM PDT
I don't even understand these sound-reproducing contraptions. What IS that?
It plays phonographs, evidently. Why it costs that much? No freakin idea.
None. That might as well be a steam iron.

Here's a suggestion: instead of porn fetishing these items, cnet, why not try
and explain to us viewers, in layman's (idiot's) terms, what makes these
things so expensive, why, and then why we should care.

I have some nice b&ws, rotel gear, etc., and even I don't recognize these
things. You can imagine what it's like for most others.
Reply to this comment
JBLs and Velodynes?
by dmizer September 7, 2007 9:46 PM PDT
I won't even begin to go into all the mumbo-jumbo audiophiles would use to describe the turntable, but despite the evolution of digital music, even a mediocre analogue rig will sound more "real" than a CD. At the end of the day, though, after you've spent $5-10,000 on a complete 2-channel system, the tens of thousands of additional dollars you need to spend to exact marginal increases in sound quality go toward gear catering to people with more money than sense. And truth be told, the people spending that type of money probably don't even know how to appreciate what they have.

That said, how in the world did JBL speakers and Velodyne subs end up in a system with Krell, Levinson and that awesome piece of art (er, turntable)? There are probably dozens of speakers (more expensive speakers, by the way) to complete an "ultimate audio system". I started wondering if they were talking about a 2-channel system or a home theater.

Think the price of the turntable is insane? How about paying $18,000 for a 1M pair of interconnects or $27,000 for a 2M pair of speaker cables? They're out there, friends...
Reply to this comment
JBLs and Velodynes?
by dmizer September 7, 2007 9:46 PM PDT
I won't even begin to go into all the mumbo-jumbo audiophiles would use to describe the turntable, but despite the evolution of digital music, even a mediocre analogue rig will sound more "real" than a CD. At the end of the day, though, after you've spent $5-10,000 on a complete 2-channel system, the tens of thousands of additional dollars you need to spend to exact marginal increases in sound quality go toward gear catering to people with more money than sense. And truth be told, the people spending that type of money probably don't even know how to appreciate what they have.

That said, how in the world did JBL speakers and Velodyne subs end up in a system with Krell, Levinson and that awesome piece of art (er, turntable)? There are probably dozens of speakers (more expensive speakers, by the way) to complete an "ultimate audio system". I started wondering if they were talking about a 2-channel system or a home theater.

Think the price of the turntable is insane? How about paying $18,000 for a 1M pair of interconnects or $27,000 for a 2M pair of speaker cables? They're out there, friends...
Reply to this comment
Why does it cost alot?
by kt2005 September 8, 2007 12:39 AM PDT
I'm not exactly sure myself, but I think it's all in the design. Let's say you want some art for your house, are you gonaa spend a few bucks on a junk $50 painting you found at a yard sale, or are you gonna go to the art gallery and spend a few hundred or thousand dollars on a masterpiece. Sure you save money, but comparing those two are like Chocolate and ****.

As for the audio system, it's a piece of art, and function. Hey, it could be worse, noone wants a $150,000 paperweight. As for the audio quality, I think audiophiles will appreciate the sound and clarity of the music. I think the speakers are overpriced, but that's just me, I don't need that much sound. My stereo cost me $1,000, and I only use it for gaming and movies.
Reply to this comment
Why does it cost alot?
by kt2005 September 8, 2007 12:39 AM PDT
I'm not exactly sure myself, but I think it's all in the design. Let's say you want some art for your house, are you gonaa spend a few bucks on a junk $50 painting you found at a yard sale, or are you gonna go to the art gallery and spend a few hundred or thousand dollars on a masterpiece. Sure you save money, but comparing those two are like Chocolate and ****.

As for the audio system, it's a piece of art, and function. Hey, it could be worse, noone wants a $150,000 paperweight. As for the audio quality, I think audiophiles will appreciate the sound and clarity of the music. I think the speakers are overpriced, but that's just me, I don't need that much sound. My stereo cost me $1,000, and I only use it for gaming and movies.
Reply to this comment
(6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.