• On TechRepublic: 10 most annoying default configurations
September 4, 2007 2:32 PM PDT

Palm cancels first-generation Foleo

by Tom Krazit

Faced with biting criticism of the Foleo, a Linux-based psuedo-laptop gadget, Palm has decided to cancel the first generation of the device.

Palm CEO Ed Colligan broke the news on Palm's official blog Tuesday after the close of the stock market. Just last week, a financial analyst predicted that Palm would have to delay the Foleo's launch until September or October because of serious software-related bugs, but Colligan decided to kill the entire project instead.

Palm says it's canceling the launch of the Foleo, but it will release a second version some day.

(Credit: Palm)

"In the course of the past several months, it has become clear that the right path for Palm is to offer a single, consistent user experience around this new platform design and a single focus for our platform development efforts. To that end, and after careful deliberation, I have decided to cancel the Foleo mobile companion product in its current configuration and focus all of our energies on delivering out next generation platform and the first smartphones that will bring this platform to market," Colligan wrote on Palm's blog. Calls to Palm representatives were not immediately returned.

Palm unveiled the Foleo at the D: All Things Digital conference in May to widespread skepticism, despite the fact that Palm founder Jeff Hawkins considered it "the best idea I've ever had." The Foleo is basically an underpowered laptop that's designed to give Treo users a break from typing e-mails on a small phone keyboard. However, few could figure out why smart phone users--who ostensibly own a laptop already--would want to buy a separate $499 device that could do little more than send e-mails.

Colligan said that Palm is still working on Foleo II in conjunction with Hawkins. But Palm has to focus on updating the Treo and getting the newest version of Palm OS--now based on Linux--to market before tackling a new category like the Foleo. Palm will take a $10 million charge associated with the cancellation of the product, he wrote.

Originally posted at Apple
Tom Krazit writes about the ever-expanding world of Internet search, including Google, Yahoo, online advertising, and portals, as well as the evolution of mobile computing. He has written about traditional PC companies, chip manufacturers, and mobile computers, spending the last three years covering Apple. E-mail Tom.
Recent posts from Crave
Poll: Why don't you have an iPod or MP3 player?
Oppo's affordabe high-end Blu-ray player is here
iPhone 3GS jailbreak, 'purplera1n,' hits Web
Apple patents point to haptics, fingerprints, RFID
Friday Poll: We the ppl--imagining a digital 1776
Gadgettes 144: The Childhood Nostalgia Episode
Duet D8 is no iPhone clone
Rocking out with stereo Bluetooth
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (12 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Hahaha
by drumpat01 September 4, 2007 2:58 PM PDT
Oh Palm, remember when you were cutting edge and relevant?
Reply to this comment
It's sad when. . .
by sbwinn September 4, 2007 4:10 PM PDT
It is sad when the best news you've hear from a company (in a long
time) is that they are canceling their latest product. The Foleo was
such a non-starter it is amazing that it ever got as far as it did.
Now that they've managed to crawl out from under that steaming
pile of failure maybe they can get on with trying to make the
company relevant again.
Reply to this comment
still makes sense
by markhahn September 4, 2007 4:21 PM PDT
sometimes integration makes sense, sometimes specialization. if you mainly do fairly short, textual emails, perhaps the existing smartphones are good enough for you. along with the phone integration (and therefore small screen, kbd), you're also normally forced to use or at least pay for the integrated services.

suppose a blackberry doesn't suit you well - don't like the physical device, want more pixels, don't like the services, etc. you might well prefer a pure-voice phone that happens to have a bluetooth link to a device like a foleo (more usable screen, keyboard, OS, etc). telco's probably don't like this model as much because users would demand to buy just the pieces they need: don't give me any mail services, just forward my packets with decent latency and price. integration breeds lock-in, which is good for some customers and bad for others, but always good for all providers...

I hope palm makes the prototype foleos available somewhere for cheap. I'd like to try one.
Reply to this comment
Thank God!!!
by appledogx--2008 September 4, 2007 4:46 PM PDT
It was already dead before they killed it.

Now maybe somebody at Palm will wake up and bring an
innovative, interesting PDA to market again. Palm has been
recycling the same old thing for years. I still like and use my old
Palm, but unless we get something with real Mac support and
better apps, Palm will be palming the dirt.
Reply to this comment
Thank God!!!
by remarquee September 4, 2007 6:18 PM PDT
Is Palm just plain stupid? What in the world were they thinking? Why in the world would anyone want such a useless toy? You can purchase a "real" laptop for the same price which offers infinitely more.

Palm has for the last five years squandered its resources. Is this what top management receive the big bucks for?

Move out of the way and let someone with vision in.

Remarquee
good move.
by thriftyT September 4, 2007 7:19 PM PDT
Palm was in a bad situation with the g1 Foleo. At least they didn't
make the situation worse by releasing this..
Reply to this comment
What a surprise!!
by Fouffy September 5, 2007 1:18 AM PDT
Even a 5 year old could have predicted this!
Reply to this comment
Too Little Too Late
by rbiz September 5, 2007 6:31 AM PDT
That pretty much sums up Palms place in the market. Clearly this
company shoulda woulda could've been the leaders in palm
computing - but no.

Palm is toast.
Reply to this comment
Had they built the phone into the Foleo...
by Ngallendou September 5, 2007 10:27 AM PDT
... I would have order a dozen of them.
They Better Get Their Act Together...
by StargateFan September 5, 2007 12:39 PM PDT
At palm. Frankly they shoudl get rid of the entire PDA lineup, the market is dead. Instead they should focus on just producing Smartphones, they are the future of handheld communication for now at least.

Secondly they should be moving quickly. Microsoft's position in the Mobile Phone Marketplace is going to expand. There are rumors circulating that Microsoft is poised to take over RIM, the company that makes the Blackberry. Microsoft is not only the competition palm could face, Apple will gain continue to gain momentum with the iPhone. It might take a few generations for the iPhone to truly be business savy, but in some area's it will move into the enterprise market.
Reply to this comment
HP Jornada 820 ???????????
by EBChasSC September 7, 2007 5:38 AM PDT
When I saw the picture it reminded me of ... no ... I thought it was ... my HP Jornada 820. This was briefly ... no ... still is a great little handheld computer ... for its time,1997. And it held the promise of great functionality with its array of expansion ports only possible in a unit of its size. But, it died a writhing death because Microsoft and HP wouldn't promote, encourage, or support its potential for expansion and function. The Foleo was going to be offered at nearly half the cost of the 820. I don't know about its functionality but it had a niche then and could now. I've just read that the major computer manufacturers are finally offering "gaming" computers. These computers are designed with the enhanced functionality that is necessary for "gaming", but also finally have the one thing that is required by gamers ... the ability to upgrade and expand ... whether it be OS, CPU, video, audio, memory,functionality, etc. THAT is what gamers have been looking for and demanding. And statistics are showing that more and more people are using their computers for that purpose. Do that with your smartphone.If HP had been committed to the 820 in 1997, it would still be functional and productive today. If Palm would do that with the Foleo, they would have a product people could use in 2020. And that's not a bad idea. The added benefit is that our landfills, and my closets, would have a lot less strain put on them. We need products that can be adapted for the future, not simply replaced. This country ought to be able to make something other than the B-52 bomber that can be functional for 50 years ... or at least 10. Obsolescence by design needs to become a thing of the past.An expandable, upgradable laptop the size of a book is not a bad idea. Another HP 820 is.
Reply to this comment
A fine company that lost its focus
by cesdewar September 7, 2007 7:41 AM PDT
Losing focus is very damaging. Better to walk in ANY direction than try and walk in all directions at once.

The puzzling thing is that Palm users are constantly telling Palm what to do and Palm constantly ignores it. I am really waiting to see if Palm's new handhelds to be released this fall will provide yet another generation of devices that don't support Wi-Fi. What Palm needs to do is simple and obvious - a robust Linux-based device with PACE to support all existing Palm applications and a good development environment for writing native Linux apps so the huge third party developer base will kickstart the new platform with a wealth of new and "prettier" looking apps - the Palm OS's 1980's vintage base GUI is showing its age badly. Supposedly this is on the way(?), but it's not a simple task from a technical point of view, and Palm must realize they need to devote ALL their technical resources to this goal - kissing off PalmSource (now part of Access) which was working on the identical goal was a dubious idea, but then diluting their internal resources with other projects was just asking for disaster.

The Foleo was not a horrible idea - perhaps just the wrong bad implementation - it could have been just an inexpensive piece of software that runs on a regular PC laptop/desktop and connects via Wi-Fi to a handheld - there is little reason for this to be a physical device when the vast majority of potential purchasers would be people who already have a notebook computer.

A Linux-based device would be far more attractive to the Corporate IT departments that have never really liked the Palm OS that much, but do have a positive attitude towards Linux, thus providing a better avenue of competition against Microsoft in that area.

Someone needs to get Palm to march to a single drummer...
Reply to this comment
(12 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

Making sense of Windows 7 upgrades

faq The basics and the fine print on Microsoft's options for those eyeing the next operating system from Redmond.
• Full Windows 7 coverage

Road Trip 2009: Big Sky Country

CNET News reporter Daniel Terdiman takes his car full of gadgets to the Rockies and the Great Plains in search of tech, science, nature, and more.
• America's Fortress: Cheyenne Mountain

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right