• On CHOW: Sexy vampire party
August 13, 2007 1:44 PM PDT

ISPs threaten new fees over BBC video service

by Anne Broache

The BBC's recently launched iPlayer, which allows eligible U.K. residents to download episodes of shows they missed on the telly, seems to be a magnet for complaints lately.

The BBC launched its iPlayer service in beta mode last month.

(Credit: BBC)

The Windows-XP only online service has already peeved Mac, Linux and Windows Vista users who can't, at least for the moment, get direct access (BBC has promised an upgrade this fall) and drawn protests over its use of Microsoft-produced digital-rights management technology.

The latest brouhaha is reminiscent of the Net neutrality debate that has raged here in the States. That controversy surrounds whether broadband operators ought to be able to charge content and application makers extra fees to deliver their content, particularly when it has the potential to consume loads of bandwidth.

In this case, major Internet service providers like Tiscali UK and Carphone Warehouse are reportedly threatening to restrict their users' downloading practices unless BBC foots part of the bill for shuttling the large files, the Financial Times reports.

A Tiscali representative told the newspaper that the new BBC service will undoubtedly clog its networks because it operates on a peer-to-peer network. Unless the ISP and BBC can come up with a "cost-sharing" arrangement, Tiscali will be forced to manage its networks by degrading the service of users who attempt to download large files at peak hours, FT reported. Tiscali is also reportedly considering creating a "two-tiered" system in which it would charge more to customers with higher-bandwidth appetites.

BT, another leading provider has been named in the reports as a "concerned" ISP, too. But a spokesman later denied being part of the extra-fee-seeking gang. In an interview with The Register that ran Monday afternoon, the company's chief press officer was quoted as saying, "We're not up in arms about iPlayer, we're not complaining to the BBC or discussing it with them."

A BBC spokesperson quoted in the service's own story was mum about the conflict, except to say, "We are in regular discussions with the ISP's and together are monitoring the costs associated with video on-demand."

But if the other concerned ISPs get their way, one has to wonder if the BBC's U.K. viewers will see a rise in the price of the license they already must pay to access the network on their traditional TV sets.

Originally posted at News Blog
Recent posts from Crave
ZiiLabs latest processor brings 1080p to Netbooks
How your cell phone can diagnose disease
Apple Store opens in the Louvre: Where next?
OOMouse has more buttons than a shirt
Gigaware remote adds HD radio to the iPhone and iPod Touch
The 404 463: Where we're not that funny, but at least we try
Hands-on: Netflix streaming on the PS3
Sony Eco TV turns off when you leave the room
Add a Comment (Log in or register)
Idiots...
by da644 August 13, 2007 3:46 PM PDT
Tiscali and the Carphone Warehouse are idiots if they think they are going to get anywhere with this. They're not going to get money from the BBC as the regulator wouldn't allow it and they are not going to get money from there customers are they will simply go elsewhere. The license fee is controlled by the UK government and the BBC has enough trouble getting it put even inline with inflation, let alone get extra for something which, in the end, isn't really even their problem. It is like someone driving your car down a road and asking you to pay for all the tolls along the way instead of paying for them themselves. These two companies are always pulling stunts like this just to get media attention, they are cheap and it shows!!! Also Tiscali already operates the "two-tiered" system they say they 'might' have to implement. This is a quote from their own site:

"This fair usage policy automatically identifies the very small number of extremely heavy users and manages their bandwidth only during peak hours (6pm to 11pm Monday to Sunday), to protect the service for all our other customers."

Idiots...
Reply to this comment
WHAT?!?
by ThatIdiotBushPres August 16, 2007 1:25 PM PDT
These winers keep on complaining about people using the service we pay them to use in the first place! Why should publishers pay so that users acces their content on the web??? The publisher already pays a nice premium for such a huge outgoing traffic from its servers. And users already pay a nice ammount of money each month for a so-called high speed Internet service. So why would anyone give more money to ISPs is beyond me!

Think about it: The ISPs wouldn't even have our business in the first place if there was no need for high speed connections! High bandwidth content is what draws us to their service... but now that people are really strating to use it, they are looking for someone to pay an additionnal fee for their service??? :+o
Reply to this comment
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

After 5 years, Firefox faces new challenges

Mozilla helped reshape the Web since releasing Firefox 1.0 five years ago. Now it's got a reawakened Microsoft and Google Chrome to reckon with.

There's a map for that: GPS or smartphone?

Almost every handset comes with mapping software these days, but standalone GPS devices are becoming more affordable than ever.