• On TechRepublic: Windows 7: Slower to boot than Vista?
July 26, 2007 1:01 AM PDT

Logitech announces an ergonomic keyboard with no learning curve

by Rich Brown
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 2 comments

We don't mind a little weirdness in the pursuit of better ergonomics, but we really dislike funky mice and keyboards that require you to relearn how to type and/or mouse. That's why we're particularly excited about Logitech's Cordless Desktop Wave desktop set, which the company announced this morning.

Logitech's new Cordless Desktop Wave mouse and keyboard set.

(Credit: Logitech)

For $89 when it hits stores this August, the Cordless Desktop Wave will give you two major ergonomic features. The first is that, as the name suggests, the keys are arranged along a wave-like pattern that ripples across the keyboard. This design is supposed to account for the fact that your fingers are not all the same length, thus the keys the keys near your little fingers and your thumbs rise up to meet your shorter digits. The other feature is the gradual arc of the key tray. The arc is not as pronounced as Microsoft's classic Ergonomic Natural Keyboard, but Logitech's design also doesn't distort the basic size and shape of any of the main letter keys.

We're especially happy about that last part. We typed this very blog post with this new keyboard, and we've been surprised at how the new layout didn't slow us down. With other ergonomic keyboards, any design tweaks usually result in certain keys that are bigger than others, which means we have to retrain our fingers if we want to maintain our standard rapid typing pace (77 wpm, but we don't like to brag). That hasn't been the case with the new Logitech board, at least after about 200 words or so. We'll have a full review of this thing, soon, but so far so good.

Rich Brown reviews desktops and various other components and peripherals for CNET. E-mail Rich.
Recent posts from Crave
The 404 466: LIVE NOW at 11 a.m.(ish) EST!
Zvox's biggest, best-sounding TV speaker
Putting bra lets you golf into lingerie
TomTom app for iPhone getting major update, new features
Review: Newsfash, the Dell U2410 isn't perfect!
Sleepbox for 40 winks in a mobile box
Graphics showdown: 11 games for newer iPhones
Top 5 car technologies
Add a Comment (Log in or register)
Consider leaving your 'comfortable rut' ...
by Paul X Beck October 31, 2007 11:58 AM PDT
77WPM? Okay. Not too shabby by today's standards I guess. I learned to type on the IBM Selectric Typewriters of the 1960's that were supplied to the schools with BLANK keys; just the two home row tactile bumps, nothing more. We were required to learn ALL the top row characters then. (I understand that many modern keyboarding classes no longer require this unless you're going into programming or certain sciences.) My point is this: I left high school in 1969 with a score of 104 AWPM and was satisfied, but fully aware that there were several people ahead of me.
Perhaps you should search on 'fastest typists' or a similar phrase? It might expand your horizons a little bit beyond your personal comfort zone. Shame on you for rejecting out of hand designs that might cause you to have to relearn something. Why would you actually continue to do something that would result, or potentially result in damage to your body if alternatives were available? Simply because it might inconvenience you for a very short time to learn a better way? There are other keyboard designs out there besides this new one from Logitech that are quite revolutionary and may well limit or significantly reduce the likelihood of carpal tunnel syndrome, along with significantly increasing your speed. There are also authoritative articles to be found that suggest that the wrist pad might actually CONTRIBUTE to repetitive motion injury, and others suggesting that a negative angle to the keyboard may be also be beneficial despite the fact manufacturers continue to stay inside the box of current design trends so as not to step on certain negative angle patents. Since anything short of the Dvorak layout is decades out of date, of what value are all the improvement achieved in accommodating reach of individual fingers? You're basically cheerleading for a product that allows you to maintain your own personal status quo. So the benefit in spending $89 is what exactly? I suppose it could be the 'cool factor', but I've got to tell you when I'm observed typing faster than the teenagers, that is perceived as pretty cool by some.
Give it some thought. BTW... I have no financial interest in keyboard layout or design. I do have a need to create and edit large amounts of material quickly and efficiently and it simply cannot be done with most 'modern' (they're antiquated in reality... quaint would be a good word) key layouts and keyboard designs. I've tried many 'unusual' designs that were built to solve the problems of finger length and reach. The more radical ones were 'okay' but ended up in museums, perhaps unfortunately. I don't really see that Logitech's new design is advanced sufficiently to be worthwhile for me. Cheers!
Reply to this comment
by BengalTigger July 1, 2009 6:07 AM PDT
I actually LIKE Microsoft's split design and can't argue with the disappearance of virtually all symptoms of carpal tunnel since having switched to it. I'm afraid this design sacrifices the gains that are achieved with a split keyboard in exchange for familiarity. Not a sacrifice I'm willing to make.
Reply to this comment

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

As alternative energy grows, NIMBY greens

With more renewable energy projects trying to come online, the country grapples with the balance between local land use and a national push for clean energy.

Google to remake programming with Go

A Unix co-creator is among those behind a language Google hopes will speed computers and programming. Today, Go becomes open-source software.