• On GameSpot: So-called 'Halo killer' gets 23 to life
July 2, 2007 9:37 AM PDT

HD radio: you get what you paid for

by Michael Kanellos

When it comes to HD radio, price matters.

Radiosophy, a start-up out of Sioux City, South Dakota, has begun to sell a hybrid digital radio, the HD100, for $99. Act now and you can get a $40 rebate. (Correction- I was calling these radios high definition, but am told it stands for hybrid digital. Sorry about the error. I'm not too good with the alphabet on some days.)

That's significantly below the $299 price of the HD Recepter radio from Boston Acoustics and less too than the $149 non-HD Recepter from Boston.

But how do all these stack up? Granted, most people don't care about radio, but my wife is nutty for NPR so it's a big deal in our house. We also live somewhat near a large TV tower in San Francisco so conventional radios don't work. Usually, radio programs sounds like emergency broadcasts from Laos.

Radisophy (L); Recepter (R)

(Credit: michael kanellos)

HD Recepter: fantastic sound and great reception. You can crank up the speakers to full volume and experience no crackling. Unfortunately, it mysteriously died after three days. Still, it was good enough to make us contemplate actually buying one--the warranty probably covers the untimely death.

Recepter: The sound quality drops a notch, but is great here too. The non-HD radio doesn't get the additional digital channels.

HD100: While both Boston Acoustics radios have fairly commanding sound, the Radiosophy unit sounded pretty thin and crackled at higher volumes. The unit takes about fifteen seconds to hone in on digital signals. Even at low volumes you could hear a bit of static. The control knobs are tough to figure out too.

On the plus side, the small company has a web site that actually gets to the point. The Boston Acoustics site is like an Ikea store: you make forward progress, but it's tough to figure out where you are going.

So in the end, the most expensive radio was the best (mysterious fatality aside), the second most was the second best but came with compromises, and the cheap one definitely had some issues.

Recent posts from Crave
Ricoh goes modular for GXR camera system
Moxi cuts price on its DVR, adds step-up model with a triple tuner
2010 Tesla Roadster Sport first drive
Sneak peek: Xobni e-mail app for BlackBerry
The DIY secret-knock door lock
New BlackBerry software will make your phone cooler
The 411: Storage limits and more on data plans
Can Bheestie Bag save your soaked device?
Add a Comment (Log in or register)
But Why Pay for It?
by TheDudeandHis360 July 2, 2007 7:32 PM PDT
In the days of iTunes, podcasts, XM and Sirius, streaming media, and youtube
why would I pay $200 for a radio? Okay. an HD radio, but still its... a radio?
Reply to this comment
Free Content
by HD Radio July 3, 2007 7:34 AM PDT
Hi Michael et al, just a brief note from iBiquity Digital, the developer of HD Radio(TM) programming. Thank you very much for your thoughtful review of HD Radio products. One detail: the "HD" in "HD Radio" does NOT mean 'high definition' or 'hybrid digital'. The HD is part of our brand of ditigal radio.

Thanks. Vicki Stearn/iBiquity Digital
Reply to this comment

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

After 5 years, Firefox faces new challenges

Mozilla helped reshape the Web since releasing Firefox 1.0 five years ago. Now it's got a reawakened Microsoft and Google Chrome to reckon with.

There's a map for that: GPS or smartphone?

Almost every handset comes with mapping software these days, but standalone GPS devices are becoming more affordable than ever.