• On MovieTome: See the villain of IRON MAN 2!
June 22, 2007 7:44 AM PDT

Sigma releases stabilized 18-200mm ultrazoom

by Stephen Shankland

Canon SLR (single-lens reflex) owners now have an answer to Nikon's 18-200mm ultrazoom--as long as they're willing to buy a non-Canon lens.

Sigma's image-stabilized 18-200mm ultrazoom

Sigma's image-stabilized 18-200mm ultrazoom

(Credit: Sigma)

Japanese lensmaker Sigma this week announced it's begun selling its 18-200mm ultrazoom for Canon SLR cameras.

These lenses are flexible, but typically have lower image quality than zoom lenses with narrower ranges or "prime" lenses with a fixed focal length. They're convenient, though, and often are called "vacation lenses" because they're popular with people who don't want to carry a big, heavy bag of better lenses.

Sigma's new lens is available for Canon cameras now; later models will arrive for Nikon and Sigma's own SLR cameras.

There aren't any optical tests yet for the Sigma lens to compare it to the Nikon, but a little compare-and-contrast with the rest of the specs:

• Sigma's costs $820 compared with about $750 for Nikon's.

• Both lenses have image stabilization technology, called optical stabilization (OS) in Sigma's case and vibration reduction (VR) in Nikon's. Nikon says its second-generation technology will give four F-stops of improvement, meaning that a person who can take steady images at 1/125 second without VR can shoot at 1/8 second with it. (Even if your camera is steady, moving subjects still are blurry, though.) Sigma is mum about the gains from its OS technology.

Nikon's 18-200mm ultrazoom

Nikon's 18-200mm ultrazoom

(Credit: Nikon)

• Both have a maximum aperture of F/3.5 at 18mm, but close down to F/5.6 at maximum extension, inflicting relatively slow shutter speeds when zoomed in all the way.

• Both are geared for SLRs with the smaller image sensor that appears on the majority of SLRs, meaning they're ill-suited for Canon's full-frame high-end SLRs or Nikon's equivalent, if they ever choose to release one.

• To counteract chromatic aberration, which causes smeary colors as different frequencies of light take different paths through lens optics, Sigma's lens has one special-low-dispersion glass element and three aspheric elements. Nikon's has two extra-low-dispersion and three aspheric elements.

• Sigma's focuses as close as 45cm (17.7 inches), compared with 50cm (19.7 inches).

Stephen Shankland writes about a wide range of technology and products, but has a particular focus on browsers and digital photography. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered Google, Yahoo, servers, supercomputing, Linux and open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/stshank.
Recent posts from Crave
Poll: Why don't you have an iPod or MP3 player?
Oppo's affordabe high-end Blu-ray player is here
iPhone 3GS jailbreak, 'purplera1n,' hits Web
Apple patents point to haptics, fingerprints, RFID
Friday Poll: We the ppl--imagining a digital 1776
Gadgettes 144: The Childhood Nostalgia Episode
Duet D8 is no iPhone clone
Rocking out with stereo Bluetooth
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (3 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
tell me abt ....
by sachin001 June 24, 2007 2:03 AM PDT
all experts here i wanna know whether lenses like 18-200 mm exclude having 2 lenses -wide n tele seperately , anyhow?
fr nikon 80D , if one wants to have a single lens fr all purposes or middle bulk of tele n wide scenes, wud this suffice?
or is thr any there option?

i also need to know how shotibg in night can reduce blurring fr zslrs or beginner stage SLRs?

which camera wl b best/
Reply to this comment
18-200 VR info
by Kofy June 25, 2007 1:14 AM PDT
I recently purchased one of these lenses, and subsequently got rid of my 28-80 & my 55-200. You can do amazing things with this lens. Its ONLY drawback is that it only goes to f3.5 at wide angle. which isnt that bad really as I use it in conjunction with a D200. I cant recommend this lens highly enough, the Vibration Reduction in this lens truly DOES work, allowing a much lower f stop even at slower shutter speeds. If you can find it, and afford it (US version not gray market) BUY IT! I got mine via E-Bay Cameta Auctions (thanks again ENZO!)
View reply
(3 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

Making sense of Windows 7 upgrades

faq The basics and the fine print on Microsoft's options for those eyeing the next operating system from Redmond.
• Full Windows 7 coverage

Road Trip 2009: Big Sky Country

CNET News reporter Daniel Terdiman takes his car full of gadgets to the Rockies and the Great Plains in search of tech, science, nature, and more.
• America's Fortress: Cheyenne Mountain

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right