Sigma releases stabilized 18-200mm ultrazoom
Canon SLR (single-lens reflex) owners now have an answer to Nikon's 18-200mm ultrazoom--as long as they're willing to buy a non-Canon lens.

Sigma's image-stabilized 18-200mm ultrazoom
(Credit: Sigma)Japanese lensmaker Sigma this week announced it's begun selling its 18-200mm ultrazoom for Canon SLR cameras.
These lenses are flexible, but typically have lower image quality than zoom lenses with narrower ranges or "prime" lenses with a fixed focal length. They're convenient, though, and often are called "vacation lenses" because they're popular with people who don't want to carry a big, heavy bag of better lenses.
Sigma's new lens is available for Canon cameras now; later models will arrive for Nikon and Sigma's own SLR cameras.
There aren't any optical tests yet for the Sigma lens to compare it to the Nikon, but a little compare-and-contrast with the rest of the specs:
Sigma's costs $820 compared with about $750 for Nikon's.
Both lenses have image stabilization technology, called optical stabilization (OS) in Sigma's case and vibration reduction (VR) in Nikon's. Nikon says its second-generation technology will give four F-stops of improvement, meaning that a person who can take steady images at 1/125 second without VR can shoot at 1/8 second with it. (Even if your camera is steady, moving subjects still are blurry, though.) Sigma is mum about the gains from its OS technology.

Nikon's 18-200mm ultrazoom
(Credit: Nikon) Both have a maximum aperture of F/3.5 at 18mm, but close down to F/5.6 at maximum extension, inflicting relatively slow shutter speeds when zoomed in all the way.
Both are geared for SLRs with the smaller image sensor that appears on the majority of SLRs, meaning they're ill-suited for Canon's full-frame high-end SLRs or Nikon's equivalent, if they ever choose to release one.
To counteract chromatic aberration, which causes smeary colors as different frequencies of light take different paths through lens optics, Sigma's lens has one special-low-dispersion glass element and three aspheric elements. Nikon's has two extra-low-dispersion and three aspheric elements.
Sigma's focuses as close as 45cm (17.7 inches), compared with 50cm (19.7 inches).
Stephen Shankland writes about a wide range of technology and products, but has a particular focus on browsers and digital photography. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered Google, Yahoo, servers, supercomputing, Linux and open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/stshank.





- tell me abt ....
-
by sachin001
June 24, 2007 2:03 AM PDT
- all experts here i wanna know whether lenses like 18-200 mm exclude having 2 lenses -wide n tele seperately , anyhow?
-
Reply to this comment
-
-
- 18-200 VR info
-
by Kofy
June 25, 2007 1:14 AM PDT
- I recently purchased one of these lenses, and subsequently got rid of my 28-80 & my 55-200. You can do amazing things with this lens. Its ONLY drawback is that it only goes to f3.5 at wide angle. which isnt that bad really as I use it in conjunction with a D200. I cant recommend this lens highly enough, the Vibration Reduction in this lens truly DOES work, allowing a much lower f stop even at slower shutter speeds. If you can find it, and afford it (US version not gray market) BUY IT! I got mine via E-Bay Cameta Auctions (thanks again ENZO!)
-
View
reply
-
(3 Comments)fr nikon 80D , if one wants to have a single lens fr all purposes or middle bulk of tele n wide scenes, wud this suffice?
or is thr any there option?
i also need to know how shotibg in night can reduce blurring fr zslrs or beginner stage SLRs?
which camera wl b best/