• On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
May 23, 2007 10:35 AM PDT

The hydrogen-powered Mercedes

by Harry Fuller
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 2 comments

One often-cited alternative to gasoline-powered cars is hydrogen. Editors Michael Kanellos and Brian Cooley took a look at one example of a hydrogen-powered test car, a small Mercedes. To keep Kanellos from endangering himself and said vehicle, they set the top speed on this hydro-chariot at only 85 miles per hour. Take a look.

Recent posts from Crave
Barnes & Noble Nook to hit stores later than expected
Searching for Cyber Monday laptop deals
Get a Brother HL-2140 laser printer for $49.98 shipped
iPhone officially lands in South Korea
How can Dell Netbook be 'perfect for tweeting'?
Investor forecasts show Psystar is crazy
Gameloft's iPhone games on sale for 99 cents
AT&T has refurbished 16GB iPhone 3Gs for $49
Add a Comment (Log in or register)
Its About time!......its time to roll with this on
by acerides May 26, 2007 8:42 AM PDT
We have been waiting and in need of this for way to long. I wonder how much help the Bush Admin. is helping with this? America should have NASA developing this before we explore space any further. This is truly great! Kudos!!

http://hitmanpro1.com
Reply to this comment
H2 fuel cell cars will never be practical
by albizzia May 27, 2007 1:37 PM PDT
The PEM fuel cells used in these cars are extremely expensive, due to the need for costly catalysts and membranes. Cost of PEM fuel cells is far higher than LiIon battery packs, or even solar cells. PEM fuel cells are also short lived, requiring replacement in less than 85K miles.

H2 is an extremely bulky fuel, all methods of automotive storage (compression, liquification, metal hydrides, etc.) consume a lot of energy, are expensive, heavy, and still take up a lot of room to get even a modest driving range.

There are several methods of making H2, all of them expensive and inefficient. Currently, the cheapest is by reacting fossil fuels with steam at high temperatures to get CO2 and H2. H2 fuel costs more per mile, and "electric fuel" costs much less per mile, when compared to gasoline.

Water electrolysis is only 60% efficient, PEM fuel cells 50%, subtract energy needed to store the H2 and overall efficiency is less than 24%. Compare that with 85% efficiency for charger and battery, and it's obvious - battery electric cars are far more efficient, and "electric fuel" will always cost much less than H2.

H2 fuel cell cars have been promised "real soon" for over 30 years, but the've already been rendered obsolete. The future is electric.
Reply to this comment
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

The browser battles go on and on

roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.

3G wireless still holds promise

The next generation of 4G wireless may get all the headlines, but advanced 3G technology will likely dominate services for the next few years.