• On CHOW: Sexy vampire party
April 3, 2007 3:40 PM PDT

FCC to fliers: No talking

by Kent German
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 1 comment
Not a time to talk

Not a time to talk

(Credit: Yahoo.com)

If the thought of self-important loudmouths using their cell phones at 35,000 feet sends shivers down your spine, you can rest easy, at least for now. As CNET's News.com reports, the Federal Communications Commission today ended a two-year investigation into a ban on in-flight cell phone use that dates back to 1991. The agency said it hadn't received enough technical information to prove that using cell phones and other gadgets while aloft doesn't interfere with an aircraft's navigation and communication systems. The FCC could revisit the issue but didn't say when it might do so. A second study by the Federal Aviation Administration, which already supports the ban, should conclude later this year.

I welcome the news (and I don't think I'm alone here) that in-flight yakking will remain a no-no. For some people, flying is bad enough without the potential of being forced to spend several hours in a metal tube crammed next to someone who can't keep quiet (remember that scene in Airplane! where the old lady hung herself?). And while I love to fly, I'm not so crazy about flying with people. We already have to deal with armrest thieves, overhead bin hogs, and passengers who act like they're going to die when forced to check their bags. So can you imagine cell phone use, too? I think not.

I like spending a few hours in a place where no one can reach me. And while I think the take-off and landing ban of MP3 players and cameras is excessive (I'm one of those aircraft "spotter" geeks), I hope the ban on cell phone use remains in place for some time. I don't know enough about avionics to claim cell phones won't interfere at all, but better safe than sorry for the moment--especially at 35,000 feet.

Kent German is a senior editor for cell phone reviews at CNET. When he's not testing the newest handsets on the market, he's blogging about cell phone news for Crave. In his On Call column, he answers reader questions and gives his take on the rapidly changing mobile industry. E-mail Kent.
Recent posts from Crave
Killer deals on BlackBerry, Droid, and Palm Pixi
This week in Crave: The boxed-in edition
Ricky Gervais helps reveal pain of cell phone salesmen
Indecent Exposure 68: Inky extents
Apple fixes AirPort problems marring video playback on 27-inch iMacs
iPhone: The board gamer's paradise
Can erasing your iPhone's memory improve performance?
Top 5 best products of the fall
Add a Comment (Log in or register)
MythBusters tested Cell Phones
by georgegt April 4, 2007 4:30 PM PDT
MythBusters & Cell Phones"
by georgegt (see profile) - April 4, 2007

MythBusters did a test on cell phones to see if they could cause a real problem with aircraft avionics. The bottom line - YES THEY CAN !
However ... Only certain types of cell phones caused any problems. The majority of phones had little or no effect on the aircrafts avionics, navigation, or FBW (Fly By Wire) equipment.

Better safe than sorry!
Reply to this comment

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

A CNET Conversation with Eric Schmidt

CNET's Tom Krazit and Molly Wood sit down with Google CEO Eric Schmidt to discuss the future of Android, the Chrome OS, the problem of real-time search indexing, and more.

Verizon tests sending RIAA copyright notices

The No. 2 phone company, known for its reluctance to intervene in antipiracy cases, strikes an agreement to forward copyright notices on behalf of the music industry.