$40 DTV box subsidy: Is it enough?
Analog TVs will need a converter box on Feb 18, 2009
(Credit: Predicta.com)If you're reading this, chances are you don't really need a $40 coupon to help pay for a converter box that'll allow you to watch over-the-air (OTA) digital television on your standard TV. But for those who happen to depend on that old TV and "free" analog television--not cable or satellite--and want to continue watching TV beyond February 18, 2009, the coupon should be a big deal. Under the new program, every household in the country will be able to apply for as many as two coupons, each worth $40 toward the price of a converter box. The boxes are expected to sell for between $50 and $70.
In other words, the boxes will still take $10 to $30 each out of the pockets of an estimated 19 million households that depend on analog TVs and OTA reception. Worse, it's hard to believe that, over the next two years, the government or a private coalition will do a good job of educating those households on their need to spend extra money to get free TV. The subsidy restricts the kind of box that the coupons cover to devices designed to do little more than convert TV signals--they can't go toward DVD recorders or other devices with built-in DTV tuners, for example.
According to the Congressional Budget Office, the government will make an estimated $10 billion by auctioning off the airwaves that'll be cleared by switching to digital TV. The companies that will eventually use those airwaves will reap many times more profit. Meanwhile, the subsidy program was allocated an initial sum of $990 million by Congress, which will pay for 22.5 million coupons. Why not just pay the extra, say, $20 apiece ($450 million) to make the coupons good for "free" boxes? Why should U.S. citizens, especially those least likely to afford the expense or even know about the eventual shutoff of their TVs, bear the burden? And if the government were really serious about educating the public about the switchover to digital, allocating money toward an advertising campaign on--gasp!--network TV itself seems like a good start.


David Katzmaier reviews HDTVs for CNET.
As far as the digital television conversion set for Feb 2009 goes...stop delaying and just do it already! Everyone (broadcasters, manufacturers, public) has already had many years to prepare for this transition. Those analog frequencies are badly needed for emergency communications.
As far as the digital television conversion set for Feb 2009 goes...stop delaying and just do it already! Everyone (broadcasters, manufacturers, public) has already had many years to prepare for this transition. Those analog frequencies are badly needed for emergency communications.
Do the math. At two units per household, this program would INITIALLY reach OVER 12 MILLION households. And MORE when the additional funds kick in!
Now put the mfgrs and retailers in the middle, between the "program" and the consumer, stir well, and wah-lahh! CLUSTER-FLOCK!!!!
Gotta stop & not put any more energy into this!
Have a GREAT DAY & .....DO/SELL something!
"A TERRIBLE thing happens when good & services don''t get SOLD.......N-O-T-H-I-N-G!"
JWO
Do the math. At two units per household, this program would INITIALLY reach OVER 12 MILLION households. And MORE when the additional funds kick in!
Now put the mfgrs and retailers in the middle, between the "program" and the consumer, stir well, and wah-lahh! CLUSTER-FLOCK!!!!
Gotta stop & not put any more energy into this!
Have a GREAT DAY & .....DO/SELL something!
"A TERRIBLE thing happens when good & services don''t get SOLD.......N-O-T-H-I-N-G!"
JWO
Why wouldn't they? Perfect opportunity to give something for "free" and get people in there who might not otherwise go. Maybe they'll have a look around at all the pretty LCD's and Plasmas that they hadn't considered before.
Why wouldn't they? Perfect opportunity to give something for "free" and get people in there who might not otherwise go. Maybe they'll have a look around at all the pretty LCD's and Plasmas that they hadn't considered before.
the people with income BELOW $20k/year ALREADY have satellite or cable.
And that number is prorably LOW.
When Money is No Object for Must Fee TV
http://tngresearch.com/newsite/articles/cyn_70412_lowinc.htm
It's not an income issue; it's an age issue. The same people who find cable
too convoluted to connect aren't going to find a converter box any easier to
use, either.
the people with income BELOW $20k/year ALREADY have satellite or cable.
And that number is prorably LOW.
When Money is No Object for Must Fee TV
http://tngresearch.com/newsite/articles/cyn_70412_lowinc.htm
It's not an income issue; it's an age issue. The same people who find cable
too convoluted to connect aren't going to find a converter box any easier to
use, either.
What is NOT right is for a government to to now force all of it's citizens to pay to watch TV ( by making people go "digital", and having to buy a NEW TV, or having to buy Satellite or cable digital service, OR having to buy new hardware that will still allow everyone's current analog TV's to work. That is just plain Wrong, man ! ) just because the gov't decided to sell ( and make even more billions from ) the frequencies that said TV programming is using. And we the people DO have the Right to have our government help folks out when they do make such a law. Without being labeled socialists by a blindly judgmental label maker like you !
And who are you to even speak for everyone else in saying that free TV shouldn't be a right ? We've always had it, it's a hallmark of our great country, just like "FREE RADIO". And Free Water !
Do you own Microsoft or something ? and think that everyone should have to pay up the nose for every dang thing ?
If our "free" over the air TV is socialism, then I reckon that the free TV and Radio that our great country has been watching and hearing for the last hundred years or so had it's pretty dang good start in socialism by your definition, now didn't it ?
Sheesh Dude...
- by kingphiz June 18, 2008 4:01 PM PDT
- shut the **** up u do not know what u talking about *****
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(15 Comments)