March 13, 2007 9:35 AM PDT

$40 DTV box subsidy: Is it enough?

by David Katzmaier
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 15 comments
Old-fashioned TV

Analog TVs will need a converter box on Feb 18, 2009

(Credit: Predicta.com)

If you're reading this, chances are you don't really need a $40 coupon to help pay for a converter box that'll allow you to watch over-the-air (OTA) digital television on your standard TV. But for those who happen to depend on that old TV and "free" analog television--not cable or satellite--and want to continue watching TV beyond February 18, 2009, the coupon should be a big deal. Under the new program, every household in the country will be able to apply for as many as two coupons, each worth $40 toward the price of a converter box. The boxes are expected to sell for between $50 and $70.

In other words, the boxes will still take $10 to $30 each out of the pockets of an estimated 19 million households that depend on analog TVs and OTA reception. Worse, it's hard to believe that, over the next two years, the government or a private coalition will do a good job of educating those households on their need to spend extra money to get free TV. The subsidy restricts the kind of box that the coupons cover to devices designed to do little more than convert TV signals--they can't go toward DVD recorders or other devices with built-in DTV tuners, for example.

According to the Congressional Budget Office, the government will make an estimated $10 billion by auctioning off the airwaves that'll be cleared by switching to digital TV. The companies that will eventually use those airwaves will reap many times more profit. Meanwhile, the subsidy program was allocated an initial sum of $990 million by Congress, which will pay for 22.5 million coupons. Why not just pay the extra, say, $20 apiece ($450 million) to make the coupons good for "free" boxes? Why should U.S. citizens, especially those least likely to afford the expense or even know about the eventual shutoff of their TVs, bear the burden? And if the government were really serious about educating the public about the switchover to digital, allocating money toward an advertising campaign on--gasp!--network TV itself seems like a good start.

David Katzmaier reviews HDTVs for CNET. E-mail David or follow him on Twitter @katzmaiercnet.
Recent posts from Crave
Japan university develops see-through fish
Robots in 2009: The wackier, the better
Time Warner Cable shows subscribers how to cut cord
Times Square New Year's Eve Ball, a timeline
Want to see Google's new phone on YouTube?
Photographers bless improved Canon autofocus
Gadgettes Podcast 168: The Web obviously-not-exclusive-at-all-anymore Episode
Report: Apple event to be held January 26
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (15 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
$40 DTV box subsidy...socialism at its worst
by RPrentice March 13, 2007 10:59 AM PDT
I'm fundamentally opposed to any form of government-funded digital television (DTV) box subsidy. Free television should not be a "right." We already have free telephone service via the telephone access fee (tax) hidden within everyone's phone bill. What's next? Free mail service? Free internet? Free video games? This is socialism at its worst.

As far as the digital television conversion set for Feb 2009 goes...stop delaying and just do it already! Everyone (broadcasters, manufacturers, public) has already had many years to prepare for this transition. Those analog frequencies are badly needed for emergency communications.
Reply to this comment
by Edbudzil June 4, 2008 7:14 AM PDT
I'm a socialist on welfare who... Well, I'm not, but I bet that got your hackles up even higher. (Would you be happier if I were a subsidized millionaire farmer watching DVD's in his megabuck tractor?) Yes, our country has lagged behind the rest of the developed world in implementing digital. They've got it and we don't because of government "intervention". It's the captialist pig :) manufacturers and their format wars who delay the process- the government just needs to be more proactive. It can be easily be argued that television has become, if not a necessity, an integral part of society. The change to digital is not my choice. I'm happy with my old (motion-lag-free) CRT TV. Hey, wait a minute- with that $1,200 government bribe- I mean, economic stimulus check, I can put a down payment on a plasma TV!
$40 DTV box subsidy...socialism at its worst
by RPrentice March 13, 2007 10:59 AM PDT
I'm fundamentally opposed to any form of government-funded digital television (DTV) box subsidy. Free television should not be a "right." We already have free telephone service via the telephone access fee (tax) hidden within everyone's phone bill. What's next? Free mail service? Free internet? Free video games? This is socialism at its worst.

As far as the digital television conversion set for Feb 2009 goes...stop delaying and just do it already! Everyone (broadcasters, manufacturers, public) has already had many years to prepare for this transition. Those analog frequencies are badly needed for emergency communications.
Reply to this comment
For more information please visit:
by Sanfordf March 13, 2007 11:29 AM PDT
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/otiahome/dtv/DTVconsumers.pdf
Reply to this comment
For more information please visit:
by Sanfordf March 13, 2007 11:29 AM PDT
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/otiahome/dtv/DTVconsumers.pdf
Reply to this comment
Brought 2u by that same group that pays $600 for..
by JohnWOwen March 16, 2007 12:36 PM PDT
This is going to be a MAJOR cluster-f**k of a program! It will be FULL of fraud and abuse, by both consumers AND seedy mfgrs & retailers. $990 million has been allocated for the program, but the govt bureaucracy will easily spend 4 to 5 times that amount in implementing the program. Think about it! $80 per household for the program and the govt will EASILY cost us/TAXPAYERS $400 per household because of their inefficiencies! (remember...we are STILL paying OVER $600 for a frigging TOILET SEAT and $200 for a HAMMER!)
Do the math. At two units per household, this program would INITIALLY reach OVER 12 MILLION households. And MORE when the additional funds kick in!
Now put the mfgrs and retailers in the middle, between the "program" and the consumer, stir well, and wah-lahh! CLUSTER-FLOCK!!!!
Gotta stop & not put any more energy into this!
Have a GREAT DAY & .....DO/SELL something!

"A TERRIBLE thing happens when good & services don''t get SOLD.......N-O-T-H-I-N-G!"
JWO
Reply to this comment
Brought 2u by that same group that pays $600 for..
by JohnWOwen March 16, 2007 12:36 PM PDT
This is going to be a MAJOR cluster-f**k of a program! It will be FULL of fraud and abuse, by both consumers AND seedy mfgrs & retailers. $990 million has been allocated for the program, but the govt bureaucracy will easily spend 4 to 5 times that amount in implementing the program. Think about it! $80 per household for the program and the govt will EASILY cost us/TAXPAYERS $400 per household because of their inefficiencies! (remember...we are STILL paying OVER $600 for a frigging TOILET SEAT and $200 for a HAMMER!)
Do the math. At two units per household, this program would INITIALLY reach OVER 12 MILLION households. And MORE when the additional funds kick in!
Now put the mfgrs and retailers in the middle, between the "program" and the consumer, stir well, and wah-lahh! CLUSTER-FLOCK!!!!
Gotta stop & not put any more energy into this!
Have a GREAT DAY & .....DO/SELL something!

"A TERRIBLE thing happens when good & services don''t get SOLD.......N-O-T-H-I-N-G!"
JWO
Reply to this comment
These boxes are going to be free
by kingtone March 16, 2007 12:45 PM PDT
I think retailers are going to cut the price and offer these things for $40 so in the end it's a wash. Especially the big stores like Best Buy, Costco etc.
Why wouldn't they? Perfect opportunity to give something for "free" and get people in there who might not otherwise go. Maybe they'll have a look around at all the pretty LCD's and Plasmas that they hadn't considered before.
Reply to this comment
These boxes are going to be free
by kingtone March 16, 2007 12:45 PM PDT
I think retailers are going to cut the price and offer these things for $40 so in the end it's a wash. Especially the big stores like Best Buy, Costco etc.
Why wouldn't they? Perfect opportunity to give something for "free" and get people in there who might not otherwise go. Maybe they'll have a look around at all the pretty LCD's and Plasmas that they hadn't considered before.
Reply to this comment
I'm reading this
by jw55 March 16, 2007 1:19 PM PDT
"If you're reading this, chances are you don't really need a $40 coupon to help pay for a converter box" I'm not sure what you mean? Do you think all your readers have the money to junk perfectly good tv's just to keep up with this year's technology which will probably be obsolete next year. Having spent well over a thousand dollars for my crt and being of limited means I'm not about to junk it before it's dead. Especially since I am less than impressed with much of the new technology. I'm no luddite (honest) but the lcd and plasma tv that I might be able to buy just don't measure up to a top of the line crt.
Reply to this comment
I'm reading this
by jw55 March 16, 2007 1:19 PM PDT
"If you're reading this, chances are you don't really need a $40 coupon to help pay for a converter box" I'm not sure what you mean? Do you think all your readers have the money to junk perfectly good tv's just to keep up with this year's technology which will probably be obsolete next year. Having spent well over a thousand dollars for my crt and being of limited means I'm not about to junk it before it's dead. Especially since I am less than impressed with much of the new technology. I'm no luddite (honest) but the lcd and plasma tv that I might be able to buy just don't measure up to a top of the line crt.
Reply to this comment
Who does this benefit?
by dzornow June 7, 2007 4:31 AM PDT
I found a piece of syndicated research a few months ago noting that 66% of
the people with income BELOW $20k/year ALREADY have satellite or cable.
And that number is prorably LOW.

When Money is No Object for Must Fee TV
http://tngresearch.com/newsite/articles/cyn_70412_lowinc.htm

It's not an income issue; it's an age issue. The same people who find cable
too convoluted to connect aren't going to find a converter box any easier to
use, either.
Reply to this comment
Who does this benefit?
by dzornow June 7, 2007 4:31 AM PDT
I found a piece of syndicated research a few months ago noting that 66% of
the people with income BELOW $20k/year ALREADY have satellite or cable.
And that number is prorably LOW.

When Money is No Object for Must Fee TV
http://tngresearch.com/newsite/articles/cyn_70412_lowinc.htm

It's not an income issue; it's an age issue. The same people who find cable
too convoluted to connect aren't going to find a converter box any easier to
use, either.
Reply to this comment
Free TV is not free - Nor
by bruceslog February 26, 2008 5:41 PM PST
Free Television is not free... it's paid for by millions of people having to watch 20 minutes or more of commercials per program ( and which the networks certainly think is worth the billions of dollars they make off of such a system, so much so that they keep doing it ). We All pay for our "free" TV when we buy stuff. So it isn't so free, whether you watch over the air TV or not, now is it ?
What is NOT right is for a government to to now force all of it's citizens to pay to watch TV ( by making people go "digital", and having to buy a NEW TV, or having to buy Satellite or cable digital service, OR having to buy new hardware that will still allow everyone's current analog TV's to work. That is just plain Wrong, man ! ) just because the gov't decided to sell ( and make even more billions from ) the frequencies that said TV programming is using. And we the people DO have the Right to have our government help folks out when they do make such a law. Without being labeled socialists by a blindly judgmental label maker like you !
And who are you to even speak for everyone else in saying that free TV shouldn't be a right ? We've always had it, it's a hallmark of our great country, just like "FREE RADIO". And Free Water !
Do you own Microsoft or something ? and think that everyone should have to pay up the nose for every dang thing ?

If our "free" over the air TV is socialism, then I reckon that the free TV and Radio that our great country has been watching and hearing for the last hundred years or so had it's pretty dang good start in socialism by your definition, now didn't it ?
Sheesh Dude...
Reply to this comment
by kingphiz June 18, 2008 4:01 PM PDT
shut the **** up u do not know what u talking about *****
Reply to this comment
(15 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.