• On TV.com: CHUCK and Sarah - So Yesterday?
January 7, 2007 9:35 PM PST

Chevy Volts forward

by Wayne Cunningham
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 4 comments
The Chevy Volt concept car

The Chevy Volt concept car

(Credit: CNET Networks/Sarah Tew)

Bad pun, I know, but "Chevy charges forward" would be worse, because the concept Volt is an electric car. Chevy grabbed the front of its new Camaro and grafted on a small sports coupe made of lightweight composite materials developed by GE. GM has been using its Chevrolet brand to push its most futuristic alternative energy ideas, such as the previously announced Fuel Cell Equinox. The Volt seems especially designed to counteract the bashing GM got in the movie Who Killed the Electric Car?, as the Volt builds on the technology GM used in its original electric car, the EV1.

While the car looks pretty cool on the outside, with a clear Lexan top stretching down over the hatchback, its underpinnings would make any tech geek drool. The Volt uses what GM calls its E-flex System, a drivetrain using an electric motor to turn the front wheels, getting its power from a bit lithium-ion battery down the center. With that electric drivetrain system, the car can go 40 miles and takes a little more than six hours to charge up.

The underpinnings of the Volt

The underpinnings of the Volt

(Credit: CNET Networks/Sarah Tew)

So to extend the range, GM adds in a three cylinder, turbocharged 1-liter engine. This engine isn't connected to the wheels, rather, it turns on and runs at a steady speed whenever the battery needs charging. GM says the range with the engine goes up to 640 miles. Now I know some of you are thinking, "Yes! I've been saying for years that instead of hybrids, cars should use engines to generate electricity, like they do in locomotives." Well, I've got some bad news--the Volt is far from reality. GM's press materials point out that a technological breakthrough in battery development must occur to for this concept to work. Currently, there's no Lithium-ion battery big enough to meet the car's requirements.

I don't know enough about battery engineering to figure out why someone just can't build a bigger battery, but I'm sure GM would use it if it existed. But take heart--battery technology, stuck in lead-acid stasis for most of the last century, is being pursued with a vengeance. The big brass ring? Owning a technology that could be used in all the world's automobiles.

Recent posts from Crave
Panasonic updates 3-chip camcorders
Nissan Juke set to debut in New York
preGAME 02: Heavy Rain
On Call: When will we see a new iPhone?
Intel taps student's robot for processor demo
What would you pay for an e-book?
Audio-Technica headphones offer noise cancellation and affordable sound
LG SL80 series LCD TV puts style first
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (4 Comments)
  • prev
  • next
perhaps a better battery already exists...
by ducducgoose January 7, 2007 10:15 PM PST
Maybe I'm wrong, but I remember seeing something about an old engineer in 'Who Killed the Electric Car' showing off his new battery design that was supposedly better than the one used in the EV. Whatever happened to that? Just a thought..
Reply to this comment
Volts from where?
by kstebleton January 8, 2007 3:05 AM PST
Electric cars are lovely, but HOW are we going to power them? Right now, every summer we run out of electricity, with our power grid running at (or over) capacity. Remember the blackout in August 2003? <br /><br />For every watt taken out of a battery, a watt+ must be put in. Roughly 1/3 of our electricity is lost at heat in the national grid. The GM battery holds 16 kilowatt hours ($5,000+). A car needs a motor with about 50,000 watts power to accelerate reasonably. If cruising at 60mph takes 25,000 watts, then that battery will be good for just under 40 miles. But recharging 16kw is like having a 5,000 watt oven on at home for 4 additional hours. At 12¢ per kw (my net rate) I'd pay about $1.92. Interesting: A Toyota Prius, getting 50mpg (probably more) consumes $2 of gasoline to go the same distance, at $2.50/gal. In stop/go traffic, it does even better.<br /><br />My point is this: Our country is not ready for everyone to consider a battery-powered car. Same goes for Hydrogen, which requires equal amounts of electricity for its manufacture. Hybrid technology using conventional fuels, regenerative braking, and efficient motors, is our only practical option TODAY.<br /><br />How can we cut costs, reduce CO2 emissions, and have a little more time to adjust to a future without cheap gasoline (yes, $3 is still cheap!)... Conservation, reduction, and mass-transit. Things we Americans all hate to think about.
Reply to this comment
Cars Get Charged at Night
by bdmyers January 8, 2007 6:14 PM PST
There's plenty of available electricity in the middle of the night when cars need to be charged. Electric cars are a great way of making use of our surplus capacity in off-peak hours.
Why use a reciprocating engine -it's turbine time!
by sdyaffe January 9, 2007 6:43 AM PST
If you are using an engine to run at a steady RPM to charge a battery, why us <br />pistons? This type of application is where a small 2 stage turbine would excel, <br />and get far better fuel effiency as well as being lighter with less moving parts
Reply to this comment
(4 Comments)
  • prev
  • next
advertisement
Click Here

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

Google's social side aims for some Buzz

Facebook and Twitter are the darlings of the social-media world, not Google--which hopes to change that with Buzz, betting it can organize your online social life.

Watching the birth of a gaming start-up

Stewart Butterfield and his friends are back at it with a new company. CNET's Daniel Terdiman was given exclusive, behind-the-scenes access as they built it from scratch.