Panasonic admits plasma TV black level change but says picture quality still 'excellent'
Panasonic says black level increases are automatic as part of normal operation.
(Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET)In response to complaints reporting a loss in black level performance in its plasma TVs over time, Panasonic has issued a statement.
It admitted that "background brightness will increase," but described the change as "automatic" over the TVs' lifespan and part of normal operation in order to "achieve the optimal picture performance throughout the life of the set."
It also said that newer plasma TVs will include a "more gradual change in Black Level over time," but made no mention of a fix for existing plasma TVs, whose owners first noted the issue at enthusiast Web site AVS forum.
Here's the entire statement as e-mailed to CNET, entitled "Automatic Control of Contrast over Operational Lifetime."
Panasonic Viera plasma HDTVs deliver exceptional picture performance throughout the lifetime of these products. Various elements and material characteristics of all electronic displays change with use over time. In order to achieve the optimal picture performance throughout the life of the set, Panasonic Viera plasma HDTVs incorporate an automatic control which adjusts an internal driving voltage at predetermined intervals of operational hours.As a result of this automatic voltage adjustment, background brightness will increase from its initial value. After several years of typical use, the internal material characteristics will stabilize and no additional automatic voltage adjustments are required. The Black Level at this stabilized point will yield excellent picture performance.
The newest Viera plasma HDTVs incorporate an improved automatic control which applies the voltage adjustments in smaller increments. This results in a more gradual change in the Black Level over time.
More questions than answers
I first contacted Panasonic seeking comment on January 11 , and the company has not responded until this statement, which was e-mailed to me Wednesday, February 3. Though arguably better than silence, the statement leaves too many major questions unanswered.
I have followed up with Panasonic seeking those answers, asking, among other questions, if/when a fix is planned for current TVs to address owner complaints; at what "predetermined intervals" do the the voltages increase; when do the materials stabilize; what the quantitative difference is between the initial black level and the "stabilized point"; which are the "newest Viera plasma HDTVs" referred to in the statement; and what should owners do who are unsatisfied with the picture quality of their TVs. I'll update this story when I receive a reply.
The big picture for plasma
As I mentioned in the original report, I haven't seen a Panasonic plasma affected by the lighter black levels yet, so it's impossible for me to reply to the big question of whether the loss of black level performance is significant enough to make the TV pale in comparison to its competitors. Many eyewitnesses believe it is, judging from the original thread at AVS forum and from a few of the comments on the report, but other owners are less definitive or report no change.
I began a long-term test using two 2009 Panasonic plasmas in my lab, but it will be at least a month before I can expect to notice any change in black level. Of course, I'll report back when that happens.
I'll also report that since 2005, my main TV at home has been a Panasonic TH-50PHD8UK plasma, and I've never noticed a change in its black level performance. At CNET, we didn't hear of this issue until we read the reports on AVS forum, and to our knowledge, past Panasonic plasmas, as well as models by LG, Pioneer and Samsung, have delivered basically consistent black levels over time.
That's why, despite Panasonic's statement that "all electronic displays change with use over time" and that after said change its sets still have "excellent picture performance," I tend to believe owners who describe the black level increase in the company's latest plasmas as unusual and ultimately detrimental to picture quality.
A quote included in my original report accords perfectly with much of Panasonic's eventual statement, enforcing that belief. In it a respected calibrator who goes by the screen name D-Nice, citing sources within the company, called the too-aggressive voltage increase a "goof" on the part of Panasonic engineering. The closest Panasonic has come to admitting as much is contained in its reference to an improved, more gradual change in new models.
Now what?
My main job at CNET is to provide buying advice regarding TVs, and Panasonic plasmas were one of my go-to recommendations. The 50-inch G10 was the most popular TV on CNET during 2009, and the V10 series earned the only Editors' Choice award I handed out to any flat-panel TV last year. In fact, after I reviewed the 2009 models, my dad bought a TC-P42X1, two of my colleagues at CNET, Matthew Moskovciak and John Falcone, bought TC-P50G10s and another, David Carnoy, bought a TC-P65S1 (we're keeping tabs on the black levels of those sets, too). It's safe to say that many readers of this Web site did the same thing dad, John, Matt and David did: buy a solid-to-excellent HDTV for a good price, and be perfectly happy with the picture quality. Judging from reader reaction, that happiness may be in jeopardy.
Nothing halts a shopper's reach for his wallet better than doubt, so I believe it's in Panasonic's best interest to answer those lingering questions. Until that happens, it's going to be hard for me to recommend the company's TVs without a degree of uncertainty.


David Katzmaier reviews HDTVs for CNET.
Eventually they would reach KURO black levels. :-)
What a disappointing, ho-hum response from Panasonic. Not the kind of thing you want to hear from a company that was supposed to pick up the torch.
Keeping quiet on this issue == lots of large screen TV sales.
Sad but probably true, but that is the perception they are creating.
Maybe I'll just grab the LCD and be done with it...
I can understand that companies screw up sometimes. However, the bests thing to do is move forward and acknowledge that they messed up and apologize. Look at Toyota, they definitely dropped the ball but have come back and said ?Oops! We?re sorry and we?ll fix it.?
Their response also makes me wonder about their new product line. It will be a while before the new sets will show the same issue. It would be better for them to say, "We messed up but this problem won't occur in our new products." That would at least make potential customers feel reassured even if it doesn't help the current owners.
Panasonic needs to respond to this in a way that makes customers feel that they are a value to the company. Sure Panasonic might have to fix 10% of their product line but that still makes them look good even if they caused the issue. Then the current owners get their sets fixed and that potential customers that they should be able to rely on their products.
Say only 1,000 people have this issue and Panasonic could fix each set for $300. Sure Panasonic would be out $300,000 but when those 1,000 people go to buy $2,000 TVs again, that could be $2 million if those customers decided to stick with Panasonic.
I was actually in the market for a plasma but I am going to wait and see what the outcome of all this is before I buy one.
Either way ratings should reflect actual performance. Not future performacne.
This sounds like Panasonic isn't willing to do anything about the problem because according to them it's something that is supposed to happen.
My 54G10 was amazing for a month and now the black level performance is comparable to a cheap LCD. I didn't pay almost $2000 for a TV that would within a month lose the ability to perform it's main selling factor.
Based on my recommendation, four close friends and family members bought Panasonic plasmas after I bought mine. I don't think I'll ever be comfortable buying another Panasonic product. I won't let anyone I know buy one either.
Maybe I can still find a NIB Kuro floating on the old interweb. Probably Samsung LED for me too.
I suspect my V10 is very close to one of those predetermined use levels, and I hate to think of seeing significantly lighter blacks.
I was planning to buy another plasma set from Panna by the end of the year, but now I'm not sure anymore. If Panna doesn't fix this, it's time to go with LED.
All that is required here is a firmware update. A simple thing to reset the black level back to where it was and change the aging routine for smaller increments. They could also add a small routine to allow the consumer to roll back the black level setting if an aging increment causes a decrease in picture quality (in the consumers opinion).
A lot of people spend a fair dime on getting these things calibrated, and this aging error is just throwing that money out the window (although I'm not a fan of paying people to calibrate a TV that any consumer with a brain could calibrate themselves).
Perhaps those people who paid for the calibration could suggest to Panasonic that maybe Panasonic should reimburse them for the cost of the calibration?
I've never had mine calibrated either, but it's not something Joe Schmo could do accurately. Good calibrators use colorimeters and reference-quality signal generators to calibrate the TV subjectively, and they typically do so in the TV's service menu. I've been in my TV's service menu--it's a scary place to be!
This is unacceptable.
Good job DK.
We value our customers' satisfaction and have taken action to investigate the validity of the statements made on this forum.
PSTC PED display engineers have recovered 2 TVs with the assistance of the service network and shipped them to Japan for investigation.
We are aware of these Internet forums and articles, however, we must rely on our engineers to complete their investigation.
Or did you mean panel background brightness which actually means the black level will rise.
- by beaugpeterson3 February 4, 2010 12:59 PM PST
- Thank you, David, for all your hard work in this matter. I purchased a P50S1 based solely on your recommendation. The old-fashioned style of investigative journalism with which you are pursuing this issue is refreshing and apparently necessary since Panasonic is being so vague about the voltage increase scheme they have implemented. I will be following your column closely and will definitely rely heavily on your advice for future television purchases. My only question is whether you think professional calibration (which I believe in) at each of the various life cycles of these units has the ability to minimize the effects of the voltage increases?
- Like this Reply to this comment 1 person likes this comment
-
-
- by Nascar_Dog February 4, 2010 1:19 PM PST
- No, but it will sure make the calibrators happy and rich
- Like this
-
- by beaugpeterson3 February 5, 2010 1:24 PM PST
- I have discussed this issue with my calibrator and he has agreed to re-calibrate my panel if necessary after the initial calibration at no extra charge. I just want to know whether this could keep black levels acceptable or if I should just return the set immediately since I'm still within the 30-day window.
- Like this
-
- by beaugpeterson3 February 8, 2010 2:42 AM PST
- Returned! The retailer can deal with Panasonic over this issue. Hopefully the S2 and G25 coming out this month or next will not go gray. David, will you do a long-term real-world test on one of this year's neoPDPs too?
- Like this
-
Showing 1 of 5 pages (140 Comments)