• On ZDNet: The Windows 7 upgrade survival guide
November 10, 2009 7:00 AM PST

Say goodbye to sleep: Modern Warfare 2 arrives

by Jeff Bakalar
and
Dan Ackerman
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 149 comments
Share

Arguably the most anticipated game of the year, Modern Warfare 2 finally lands today. Following a week of content controversy and broken street dates, Modern Warfare 2 promises to elevate the action and intensity beyond even the classic original game.

Among a sea of November releases, Modern Warfare 2 manages to stay afloat with its thrilling storyline and addictive online multiplayer. Here's what we think:

Jeff:
First-person-shooter games are one of the most common genres in the industry, so with a seemingly infinite amount of competition how does the Modern Warfare franchise continue to dominate? It's able to do so by providing a highly engaging and streamlined online multiplayer experience.

The XP (experience points), perks, challenges and killstreak bonus elements that made Call of Duty 4 so memorable are back and more rewarding than ever. In fact, there is so much going on screen at once, you're sure to unlock multiple rewards each round you play at least for the first few hours or so. The smooth 60 frames per second gameplay returns, and believe it or not, we think it feels even faster than before.

Like its predecessor, Modern Warfare 2 showcases a highly in-depth and customizable online offering. Players can choose from dozens of online modes, each with their own set of rules. New to MW2 are hundreds of custom titles, emblems, and the ability to assign and unlock killstreak perks. You still have the ability to construct a custom class and choose which standard perks you'd like to take advantage of.

The multiplayer maps in Modern Warfare 2 feature a variety of locations, from airport terminals to desert caves. Each map has its own personality and charm, though you will need to learn their geography quickly in order to begin moving up in the ranks.

While it can be overwhelming at times, the online multiplayer experience in Modern Warfare 2 is simply in a class by itself. The $60 price tag would be well spent on this mode alone, but there also happens to be a thrilling triple-A single player campaign packed in as well.

Dan:
After the onslaught of big budget, high-profile titles such as The Beatles: Rock Band, Dragon Age, and Uncharted 2, no one would be blamed for feeling a little game fatigue this fall. But saving the best (at at least the biggest) for last, Modern Warfare 2 is expected to be the 800-pound gorilla of games this holiday season.

Like a big blockbuster action movie (of the Schwarzenegger or Michael Bay variety), Modern Warfare 2 is loud, incoherent, and incredibly violent, packing more action into five minutes than your average service member sees in an entire tour of duty. As a sequel, it doesn't bring a lot new to the table -- but as fan service, it's an instant classic, giving us more of the tasty pop culture junk food offered by the original game (itself a spinoff of the WWII-set Call of Duty series).

Beneath the surprisingly neocon-ish Tom Clancy conspiracy theories, Modern Warfare 2 also has to be credited with kickstarting the latest round of debate among commentators, bloggers, and talk show hosts about how interactive entertainment fits into the cultural puzzle alongside film, novels, and television.

Controversy has sprung to life regarding a level of the single-player game set in Russia. There, as an undercover member of the U.S. Military, you infiltrate an organization of radical Russian militants as they carry out an airport attack. Some have accused the game of letting players step into the shoes of a terrorist -- and while that's an oversimplification, the sequence is still disturbing to watch, much less play through.


While countless films and television programs have depicted hapless undercover cops or FBI agents in deep cover, forced to commit crimes in the name of a greater good, actually controlling the character in question adds some interesting layers. Without giving away too much of the plot (minor spoiler warning), there are several different ways one can play through the airport attack level.

We chose to at the very least do no harm -- by either not shooting at all, or firing up in the air. We're sure plenty of gamers will take this opportunity to gun down helpless civilians -- what this says about them is a matter of interpretation. Interestingly, any attempt to turn the tables on the terrorists ends up with the player's undercover character very quickly dead.

In the end, it doesn't much matter which path one chooses -- the chapter seems to wrap up the same way regardless -- but it's a thought provoking sidebar for a game mostly concerned with hoorah flag waving and a fetishistic obsession with military hardware.

Of course, it's just as easy to ignore the subtext of putting yourself in the shoes of a terrorist (or at least an undercover protagonist masquerading as one) and just enjoy the ride. Thanks to Hollywood-level production values, breakneck pacing, and great controls that just "feel" right, even in the very crowded first-person shooter genre, Modern Warfare 2 stands out as a best-of-breed.

The following products mentioned are available.

On Sale Now: $58.99 - $59.99
View the latest prices for Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (PS3)

On Sale Now: $58.99 - $59.99
View the latest prices for Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (XBox 360)

On Sale Now: $54.99 - $67.59
View the latest prices for Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (PC)

Recent posts from Crave
The 404 482: LIVE NOW at 11 a.m.(ish) EST!
How to fit a pharmacist in your pocket
Crave giveaway of the day: Targus Crave laptop bag
Boxee unveils prototype 'Boxee Box'
The 411: Data talk and music transfer
Top 10 2009: Most popular MP3 players and accessories
Inside CNET Labs Podcast 72: Depressed, and/or tired.
Top 10 most popular cell phones of 2009
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 4 pages (149 Comments)
by xmaster_dosx November 10, 2009 7:20 AM PST
i cant wait to get home from work to play this.
Reply to this comment
by Motyoj November 11, 2009 5:16 PM PST
Doesn't appear that you're being very productive there. Just go home and play it now.
by tubaloth November 10, 2009 7:35 AM PST
I think now days there is such a fine line of what kind of "shooting" is okay or not. If this "person" has a gun then its okay to "kill" them. Even if they don't have a gun and are just trying to kill you (zombie) then its okay. It is a video game. I do see a smaller worry I guess about some kid that might ENJOY it. But thats what games or for right? My problem is there is going to be some guy gets arrested in the airport for either just having a gun. Then MW2 gets blamed for it.
Reply to this comment
by daneusse November 11, 2009 6:19 PM PST
Think major ********* Jack Thompson! massacre-chaser extraordinaire. immediately after the virginia tech shotting, and before Cho was even identified, he went on tv to rant about how he was sure the perpetrator was into violent videogames (he wasn't). look up PIXELANTE!
by cterryr2 November 10, 2009 7:58 AM PST
This game sucks! They should have made it 64 players VS 64 players not backwards with less players! I have never seen a war with only 18 people. I am so mad I will not buiy this game ever. It all hype!!!!!!!! Top it off it is over priced! Why are all other games 50 and this one 60 yest they give us even less! A rip off!
Reply to this comment
by umbrae November 10, 2009 8:38 AM PST
As you saying wars only have 64 people?

I definitely feel bad for the way Infinity Ward is treating PC users. I am not a FPS fan and only play a few of them (none of the COD). I am getting the MW2 only because it comes with the 250gig Xbox; otherwise, I would not have it at all. I have heard good things about MW1, so I am looking forward to trying it since the XBOX version is just like any other XBOX version.

However, if I was a fan on the PC I would definitely skip this game. It might make sure MW3 never hits PC, or make other PC game makers respect the needs of PC gamers. I buy very few PC games these days because of this type of stuff, so I wish COD PC games luck in the future.
by jets2400 November 10, 2009 8:41 AM PST
don't know what cave you're living in but all new games are 60 dollars...have been for a long time. People like you waste your breath talking about stuff you don't know and make no sense at all. Now, back to your knitting.
by famoussasjohn November 10, 2009 9:04 AM PST
It's not the 90's anymore games are $60 and have been ever since the next gen gaming consoles released. quit whining, you sound like an idiot who doesn't know what they are talking about. It's not all hype, play the game and you will change your opinion as this game has lived up to the hype and within the first 4 missions, this game is so far better than MW1.

Also for PC users, I do agree that 9v9 is sort of low, but it also will help with the game being filled with people and everywhere you go you get shot, you can actually get spawned and not worry about dying instantly. That was an issue with MW1 and having a higher player capacity. If you still feel like you are getting shafted, don't get the game. Plain and simple.
by Sardonik November 10, 2009 9:42 AM PST
@jets2400, famoutasjohn

Actually contards, typical PC games run for $10 cheaper. Console games are usually 60 because of the added license fee. But I don't suppose either of you have ever heard of steam, impulse, or any of the "proper" places to get PC games?
by famoussasjohn November 10, 2009 10:18 AM PST
Sardonik - I know of steam, have used it for most of the games that I have used. CS, CS:S, Half life 1 and 2 pretty much the whole Valve collection. I wasn't aware of the pricing, but maybe wait for a special promo, and also if you purchase the game at best buy and kmart, i believe you get a 10$ giftcard, it may be only for consoles. Can't control what the companies are going to charge for the games,
by jets2400 November 10, 2009 10:27 AM PST
no, because like he said it isn't the 90's....if you're playing on a PC you're wasting your time
by goatfinder November 10, 2009 10:35 AM PST
People still play games on the PC?? besides World of warcraft?
by Sardonik November 10, 2009 10:46 AM PST
@famoussasjohn

Alright I admit, I misjudged you. However, the fact of the matter is still that CoD4 : MW1 upon release was $50 for the PC. Never mind that it didn't have a group discount option, as many steam games are doing now. I preordered borderlands and L4D2 for around $30 each by going in with 3 other people and getting a 4 pack of each. Now that's value.

IW have turned their backs on PC gaming, but that's fine, I never really played any of their games but the one that came with my GTX 260. Valve's FPS games are superior and play infinitely better on the PC.
by Sardonik November 10, 2009 10:51 AM PST
@goatfinder

20 million steam accounts and counting.
by famoussasjohn November 10, 2009 11:06 AM PST
Sardonik - Unfortunately, that is what happens when the company does the pricing of games, I completely agree that the price should be $50, but that is not up to us. We can complain all we want, but it is not going to help anything right now. Infinity Ward has made it clear pretty much with the very low support for the PC fan base of this game. I can understand that they are going to be supporting more console type players than PC, but COD4 had huge support, why not this game? It doesn't bother me as much as someone that does not want to play on a console.

But the reason behind that Value pack is, those are Valve games, and they can do the price points on the games like that and run special promos. Activision and Infinity Ward have a say on what they want for their games. Understandable, but why not charge the norm price for PC games?
See more comment replies
by lil-yankee November 10, 2009 8:03 AM PST
Nice piece.
I bought this game before it came out, (11/07/09) and already there were around 270.000 people in the ranks list. The retailer that sold me the game advised me not to play online but after beating the game in about 5 hours, i needed to go play online. The online play is simply amazing. Every detail, every aspect was covered and the game play and experience is awesome. thank you activision for it. great buy
Reply to this comment
by Sardonik November 10, 2009 8:26 AM PST
I feel genuinely bad for people who have never played a proper PC FPS who are deluded enough into thinking this is a passable multiplayer experience. 9v9 and 6v6 is a joke for pub play. Team fortress 2 supremacy. This game is going to flop on the PC, IW will blame piracy, and they will finally abandon the PC and go full contard.
Reply to this comment
by Buick107 November 10, 2009 11:41 AM PST
PC first person shooters are by far superior to the console clones. Contards can't hit a thing without "aim assist" or some other lame nursemaid helping them. If someone really wanted to blow the gaming world wide open, remake Battlefield 2142 with the graphics quality of the Call of Duty franchise. MW maps are just run and gun, with no real options for strategy. If your into CQB thats fine but the openess of the Battlefield maps (vehicles if you feel like it that night, sniper if your feeling sneaky, medic if your feeling friendly, etc) keeps the game from getting repetative. I've played all the COD games and they were fun but I was done with them in 6 months or less.
by jets2400 November 10, 2009 12:52 PM PST
@Buick107

If you think Call of Duty games don't take strategy you must be absolutely terrible at them...try playing me in any of them and I'll show you strategy and make you cry at the same time
by stockyjoe November 10, 2009 7:20 PM PST
I know what you mean, but hey give these kids a break. When you've always driven a honda civic how can you possibly guage the difference between driving that and a skyline GTR. The detail and controls of PC games specifically on the mulitplayer side is something most of these people cant understand because they have never experienced it for comparison.
by hockeymass November 11, 2009 6:41 AM PST
Video game snobs are the worst kind of snobs. Why do you care how someone else has fun, as long as they're having fun? I don't enjoy throwing down hundreds of dollars on new hardware for my PC, so I have a lappy that I play WoW on (which is a fine game, and more fun to me than the tedium and jumpcamping of EVE). I've had the best PC gaming had to offer, experienced Crysis with the graphics cranked to 11, and it's awesome, but I just can't afford to keep up with it, and I think if you look down on someone else because they choose to play the same game on Xbox instead of a 1200$ PC, then that says something about the kind of person you are.

Get over yourself.
by jets2400 November 11, 2009 8:56 AM PST
I like hockeymass' comment. It just makes me slightly angry when someone says a game is bad or things like it requires no strategy when they clearly know nothing about the game. If you don't like the game because you suck at it, sorry. Either get better or drop it but don't diss it just because you suck.
by Sardonik November 11, 2009 10:37 AM PST
@hockeymass

Don't hate because I have taste.

PS: My PC was around $500, incorporating old parts.
by tumbes2000 November 11, 2009 12:07 PM PST
I love to hear about PC guys complaining about games like MW2. All I can see is someone who is willing to pay $2,000 for the same game experience as an Xbox 360 or PS3. Clearly most other people have realized this, which is why PC gaming is dying (no matter how it is distributed).

Oh yeah with console I don't have to wade through the millions of possible PC configurations to see if my game is going to work or not.
by repete66211 November 11, 2009 1:32 PM PST
The last multi-player PC game I bought was COD: MW1. I quit because of all the cheaters. Don't blame IW or any other company for the death of the multi-player FPS on the PC, blame the hackers.
by Buick107 November 12, 2009 8:01 AM PST
Funny how no one defended there use aim assist on consoles ;)
by vmccoll November 12, 2009 4:00 PM PST
@Buick107 I love Battlefield 2142 and still play it. There's cool things about that game that I just can't find in more recent online shooters.
by haiguyz November 10, 2009 8:34 AM PST
gonna get this once school is over
Reply to this comment
by famoussasjohn November 10, 2009 8:57 AM PST
Played 4 missions last night after I picked it up at 12:01. The game is AMAZING so far. It runs smooth, story is great so far, starting the second Act today after work. Can't wait to beat it and get it on with the Multiplayer. From what I have heard, the game is between 6-8 hours.
Reply to this comment
by goatfinder November 10, 2009 10:28 AM PST
Haven't tried the campaign yet, but the multiplayer is crazy smooth. And what i also found was that the time it takes to 'search' for a new game is lightning quick. Often i found myself getting kicked out, or long search times for new games, but with MW2 it's almost instant.
by Haskett2 November 10, 2009 9:07 AM PST
I understand that people are upset about the PC crap. This does not change the fact that this is a great game. I only every played COD4 on my X-Box and now I am playing MW2 on my X-Box. You can ***** all you want but your missing out. Stop crying and go get a copy. There where 100's of people at Best Buy list night for the 12:01AM launch. Everyone online last night was having a great time. It?s new and fresh. This game is a lot better than the first one hands down. Now if I can keep form pissing off my girlfriend I will be OK.

Egg :-)
Reply to this comment
by civykilla November 10, 2009 9:26 AM PST
I got this game at midnight and stayed up until I couldn't see straight anymore. It is a really good game. Much better than the others so far..
Reply to this comment
by kewell82 November 10, 2009 10:40 AM PST
FINALLY!
Reply to this comment
by Aspyder November 10, 2009 10:41 AM PST
I wish the PC users would stop whining. Who the hell wants to keep spending money to update their d@mn pc everytime a new game comes out. Consoles games may not be always a better experience, but its a hell of lot cheaper to buy a new game on them , versus spending several hundred on a video card so I can play (the current big hit game) and then go back to surfing the internet.

Got the game on 360 and stayed up till almost 4 AM and had to be up at 6..paying for it now. Worth it though.
Reply to this comment
by Sardonik November 10, 2009 10:50 AM PST
Who the hell wants to buy a whole new console when their current one becomes obsolete? It's the same stuff, at least with PC gaming you can take much better advantage over technological development, as well as being able to keep certain parts between upgrades. I made my gaming computer with $500, and a slew of old parts and it outperforms any console.

Also you can get graphics cards for like $80 that are better than the 360's one. The 9800GT specifically.
by desRee9 November 10, 2009 8:10 PM PST
http://www.1up.com/do/blogEntry?bId=9009350

Myth: PC gaming is just too expensive of a hobby

Truth: In actuality, Moore's law continues to make PC gaming one of the most affordable hobbies around. You DONT need a $3k rig to play pc games. My 14 year old little brother built a $500 dollar pc on his own that beats the pants off any console in the performance department. Not only does it play modern games at almost max settings but he knows all of the components inside. No boxing up the entire pc for a lengthy rma when lights start to flash the wrong color. Simply head to the local retailer for a singular replacement part while the broken hardware is fixed, and you're back to where you left off within minutes.

Also, most pc components last well beyond console shelf lives. My brother still games with a pentium 4 with frame rates of 60fps in Call of Duty 4. Graphics cards remain the biggest "hurdle" and while they were expensive back in the day, upgrading today will cost you little more than a $100 for console-crushing performance.
by Pauliex November 11, 2009 3:53 AM PST
Let's not forget the control issues... the mouse/keyboard combination is unbeatable, and is totally unmatched by a console controller. Above all else, this puts the PC experience in a different league to that of a console.
by Roklan November 11, 2009 6:05 AM PST
to make it worst, who wants to sit in front of a computer when you can sit on your living room couch with only a wireless controller in your hand?
by amoreno73 November 11, 2009 11:27 AM PST
I have finished the campaign in 6 hours maybe but still all I had was a 3.2 ghz dual core amd athlon 6400 and 8800gts 640 in sli and had no frame loss. The entire setup is about 2 years old so still incremental upgrades over time is what makes PC gaming good. Also the mouse/keyboard helps in this game. I had a choice of PS3 or PC versions and choose PC because of the at least once or twice a year LAN parties that I happen to participate in and only works for PC systems.
by hynguyen02 November 10, 2009 10:49 AM PST
I don't know about "best shooting game ever", but I will tell you it is an amazing game. No doubt in my mind it is way better than Halo.
Reply to this comment
by November 10, 2009 10:51 AM PST
On a Personal Computer IS and WILL always be the best way to play a FPS.... Period
Reply to this comment
by Roklan November 11, 2009 6:14 AM PST
Ive tried both and it takes a certain amount of nerdyness to enjoy the PC better.
by scrubbingbubbles November 21, 2009 12:57 PM PST
yeah PC is more for the die hard nerd types. I prefer to be on my couch in front of my big tele pwning newbs.
I use a computer for work all day every day...i dont want to come home and sit in front of another one.....laaame.
by kornedbeefy November 10, 2009 11:12 AM PST
Wow, don't you hate it when clueless consolers try to troll on PC gaming, so stupid. You guys should try a FPS such as BF2 or COD MW1 on a PC and then come back and let us know what you think. Stop imagining that your, what is essentially a baseline PC with a handicaped control, the gamepad is the best way to experience FPS gaming.

This is a more viable thread
http://www.dailytech.com/Fans+Line+Up+For+Call+of+Duty+Modern+Warfare+2+Launch/article16765.htm
Reply to this comment
by douggdangger November 10, 2009 11:19 AM PST
"by Aspyder November 10, 2009 10:41 AM PST
I wish the PC users would stop whining. Who the hell wants to keep spending money to update their d@mn pc everytime a new game comes out."

You are an idiot. Anyone with a modern dual core PC can buy a $100 9800GT video card and be able to play many new games with better graphics and performance than a stinking console.
Reply to this comment
by Absolution2009 November 10, 2009 11:22 AM PST
PC is the best for FPS. I guarantee if you play against 2 people with same skill level 1 on PC 1 on console the PC will always win.

Why?
-Better control
-Faster speed adjustments
-Faster gun changes/swaps
-Manuevering is so much better on PC

Now, I have seen insane shooters on console but all in all, it's faster and more control and better aim on PC than console.
Reply to this comment
by KILLALITRAE November 10, 2009 11:25 AM PST
What's up with not being able to chat with party during tdm,thats A MAJOR BLUNDER on IW's part yet you can do it on merc tdm? thats just crap!
Reply to this comment
by FargoUT November 10, 2009 11:29 AM PST
The basic problem with the PC is simple: with a console, players are put on an even playing field for the most part (connection issues may pop up and thwart some games). With PCs, a lot more comes into play--people with high end systems are at a distinct advantage over those with less powerful systems. When it comes down to multiplayer gaming, people want to feel that their skill as a gamer is the deciding factor in rank, not who has the best PC setup. This may not be entirely accurate (it's how people feel, not necessarily the reality), but it's probably a large reason for why console gaming has far surpassed PC gaming.
Reply to this comment
by Sardonik November 10, 2009 11:53 AM PST
That's not why it's more popular at all, it's popular because it's simple.
by desRee9 November 10, 2009 8:25 PM PST
http://www.1up.com/do/blogEntry?bId=9009350

Ill have to agree with sardonik on this. People's perception of gaming is largely fed by generational ignorance. A $500 rig can easily compete with a $5k rig. Where is all this "powerful" stuff coming from. A decent mouse, a framerate of 35+ fps, and a good internet connection is all you need. Again a few hundred dollar rig can deliver that. What brings down the entry barrier for consoles is the inaccuracy of controls in many cases. Aim assist is like a player-wide handicap where everyone "feels" like they have a better shot but in reality everyone just has one hand tied behind their back. Sure there will still be those who are better but everyone is still using the same crutch.

My biggest suggestion has always been to undertake the very fun project of building your own computer and getting a feel for what it offers in comparison to your console. Then on that basis formulate a response to the associated topics of discussion. It really helps make the entire gaming community more enjoyable.
by boeush November 10, 2009 12:06 PM PST
"Consoles games may not be always a better experience, but its a hell of lot cheaper to buy a new game on them"

Wow, really? Most PC gamers just pirate stuff, and so get to play the latest and greatest for "free"... Even those who pay, can easily (though of course illegally -- but such is life) share copies with friends. Then there are games that are free/open-source; there are great free/cheap legacy game-of-the-year titles that one can play thanks to forward compatibility or emulators. Consoles are little more than tricked out prison cells; PCs set you free.

"versus spending several hundred on a video card so I can play (the current big hit game)"

Uh, newsflash: the current crop of consoles are based on 2/3-year old technology or even older (the tech is already dated by the time a console model even ships for the first time, because development of custom console hardware, software development tools, and initial crop of games takes up considerable time.) A mid-range PC bought 2 years ago has way more computational and graphics horsepower than any console. A mid-range PC bought today will mop the entire floor of the Smithsonian with any console. So no upgrades are necessary to play any console-quality game. Of course, on decent PCs you can also crank up quality way beyond anything any console is capable of; for that you do need a more serious/expensive set-up; then again you can still get a cheapo PC and play the same games, just with quality settings throttled down...
Reply to this comment
by section_disparu6 November 10, 2009 12:21 PM PST
You can thank all of the PC piracy that goes on for COD4: Modern Warfare, for why the PC version of Modern Warfare 2 is so locked down and PC user-unfriendly.

This is not a coincidence & things do not happen in a vaccuum. Infinity Ward did a detailed study of the number of people who played COD4: Modern Warfare on the PC. The numbers were staggering in terms of just how many pirated copies of the PC game were being used for online play. Rumors are that over 70% of all PC players who played online are using less-than-legit copies of the game.

I really do feel sorry for all those PC players who went legit & purchased the game. You guys & gals deserve so much more than to be shafted like this. As for all those who took the easy way out in order to play COD4, they really could care less. After their expected temper tantrums from not being able to do the same thing to MW2, they will simply look for other games to pillage & pirate.
Reply to this comment
by boeush November 10, 2009 12:35 PM PST
That's why PC gaming's industrial future is in subscription-type online games. You can't pirate your way out of a monthly subscription fee :-)

Though of course there will always be free content as well, due to ad-supported titles, hobbyist game designers, and startups trying to make a name for themselves.

However, there's also one other consideration: size of the market. PC market is much bigger than all console markets combined. Even when a title is 90% pirated, the 10% who do pay still provide a decent-sized cashflow. It may not be enough in itself to pay for development, however smart developers can leverage the same code base and content to target multiple gaming platforms. From that POV, it's dumb to neglect the potential profits from the PC side, all the inevitable piracy notwithstanding.

Oh, and as for things being "locked down", I say good luck with that. There isn't any software technology that can't be cracked and hacked to pieces by dedicated people. Doubly so for especially popular titles. Any attempted lockdowns or protections are simply guaranteed not to last; IMHO they're a waste of time, money, and developer resources. I keep wondering when most of the software firms will finally accept this simple, basic, irrefutable fact...
by soomin307 November 10, 2009 3:12 PM PST
Its the same thing for XBOX and PS3 users. There are a lot of people that have pirated versions of MW2 that just waited for the launch date to play online so they don't get caught.

Piracy shouldn't be the reason Infinity Ward turns their back on PC Users. What about all the pirated games on the other consoles? For anyone to say it doesn't exist or it isn't a problem is completely clueless to the gaming world.

Infinity Ward knows that gameplay on the PC is far greater than on consoles which are just mini versions of PCs. They just lost a lot of fans.
by sting7k November 10, 2009 5:54 PM PST
@soomin307, the difference is on consoles to play pirated games your console must be modded. Microsoft aggressively bans modded consoles from LIVE, I don't know about Sony. I would say PC users are way out in front on the pirating level.
by darkpoet25 November 10, 2009 6:49 PM PST
Sting7K, I know a couple of people at work with modded 360's. It's funny because one of the guys was bragging about it, all I can say is that it will catch up to him and fast. When I told him that I was buying a copy for my PS3, he goes "Why so you can play for free online." Nope just not dumb enough to get a system modded. I will have the last laugh when he gets busted for doing this, as will the other guy at work and the person who gave them the burned copies of the game. Microsoft takes that very seriously as well as Sony, altough you can't really mod a PS3 as far as I know.
by repete66211 November 11, 2009 1:40 PM PST
So hackers and cheaters ruined PC gaming? Big surprise. No doubt the very people who ruined it are the ones ******** the loudest.
Showing 1 of 4 pages (149 Comments)
advertisement
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

Google hopes to turn the river into a canal

Searching real-time services like Twitter at the moment is like standing in front of a firehose on a hot day: you'll get cooled off, but you'll get knocked over. Google wants to change that.

Will video site Vevo be next-gen MTV?

Vevo is the Web music-video service built by the big record labels with help from YouTube. Can it make an MTV-like splash?