September 25, 2009 1:51 PM PDT

Bionic eye may restore sight to the blind

by Tim Hornyak
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 12 comments

MIT's prototype retinal implant consists of a flexible substrate, power and data receiving coils, an electrode array, and a stimulator microchip.

(Credit: Shawn Kelly/MIT)

Electronic retinal implants that can help certain visually impaired people see better are getting closer to reality with a new MIT prototype (PDF).

Engineered eyes a la Blade Runner remain a long way off. But by replacing the function of retinal cells, the implants could help provide a degree of basic vision to those afflicted with retinitis pigmentosa or age-related macular degeneration, major causes of blindness.

Users would wear special glasses fitted with a small camera that relays image data to a titanium-encased chip mounted on the outside surface of the eyeball. The chip would then fire an electrode array under the retina to stimulate the optic nerve. The glasses would also wirelessly transmit power to coils surrounding the eyeball.

In this illustration, the glasses transmit data and power to the prosthesis.

(Credit: Boston Retinal Implant Project)

MIT has been working on retinal implants for 20 years as part of the Boston Retinal Implant Project. About 10 years ago, researchers tested the electrodes on six blind patients, who reported seeing cloud-like images when stimulated.

MIT scientists led by John Wyatt, an electrical engineering professor, want to test their new prototype on patients within three years.

The implants have been successfully placed in pigs for as long as 10 months without damage to the electronics, according to MIT.

About 20 teams worldwide are working to realize the dream of eye implants that could work as well as cochlear implants for the hearing-impaired. But the delicate structures of the eye, as well as engineering challenges, have made for slow progress.

"To create a bionic eye is equivalent to trying to create a television as compared with a radio," Nigel Lovell, a professor at the University of New South Wales collaborating with Australian groups to create a bionic eye, says in this video. "It's orders of magnitude more complex."

One issue researchers must tackle is where to place the electrodes. The Australian group would place them on top of the retina, while MIT's approach is to place them beneath the retina. MIT says that reduces the risk of retinal tearing and requires less invasive surgery.

What might early bionic vision look like? Very low-res. Check out this simulation from a research group at the Tokyo Institute of Technology that wants to use cultured neurons on an electrode array to simulate vision in patients where the optic nerve is not intact.

Since retinal devices aim to replace the millions of photoreceptor cells in the eye, a high-resolution retinal prosthesis firing thousands of pixels at video speed will likely be required for near-natural vision. But that could be decades away.

As of mid-July, though, 30 patients worldwide had been implanted with the Argus II retinal implant developed by California-based Second Sight. It features a 60-electrode grid fixed to the retina and has shown limited but promising results so far, as seen in this BBC interview with a blind man who is now able to perceive a white line on the floor and distinguish white socks from black ones.

A new Argus model with a higher electrode count is currently under development.

Crave freelancer Tim Hornyak is the author of "Loving the Machine: The Art and Science of Japanese Robots." He has been writing about Japanese culture and technology for a decade. E-mail Tim.
Recent posts from Crave
Apple's iSlate: What we know for sure
Best hardware and software add-ons for your PC
Kindle is most gifted Amazon item, ever
Android eHow app: Get and share advice on anything
Will recorded music survive the 2010s?
Monitor OSD Quick Guide: (Some of) the ins and outs
So you've got a Zune...now what?
So you got an iPhone, now what?
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (12 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by user256 September 25, 2009 2:09 PM PDT
You talk about your woman, I wish you could see mine.
Reply to this comment
by user256 September 25, 2009 2:10 PM PDT
You talk about your woman, I wish you could see mine.
Reply to this comment
by nate736259 September 25, 2009 2:57 PM PDT
I know it's silly (since they likely weren't testing the entire system), but was I the only one laughing at the mental image of pigs wearing glasses for 10 months?
Reply to this comment
by joefosho619 September 25, 2009 5:07 PM PDT
At least someone cares about blind people.

OH WAIT. They made this for the money huh?
Reply to this comment
by horseboy September 25, 2009 7:34 PM PDT
coolest thing ever..! now i dont have to worry about being blind..
Reply to this comment
by EvanSei September 25, 2009 7:52 PM PDT
this is a huge step forward and will help many.... oh wait insurance wont cover this thing, to bad. Why can't insurance companies just do the right thing?
Reply to this comment
by sandor_f September 26, 2009 7:35 AM PDT
Insurance companies, like with all drugs and medical devices, will pay for it when Medicare does, which wont be until it is FDA approved.
by NervClaX September 28, 2009 7:08 AM PDT
I'm sure Obama will be happy to find a dog to drag your blind ass around. I don't know about you, but if I were blind, I'd be willing to pay out-of-pocket to see again. You can't make progress in medicine or technology without $$$ and these guys seem to be doing some great work. So pay up! They've only been hard at work for the last TWENTY YEARS!

And while you're at it, reward the shareholders who helped finance it. Then, they'll take their profits and roll it over into new medical research investments. How long do you think this stuff would take if the UN were in charge of it?
by EvanSei September 28, 2009 7:05 PM PDT
@NervClaX
I am not saying that I would not pay out of pocket for this thing, because if I had the money (and was blind) I would, I am also not saying that the makers and shareholder do not deserve compensation. all I am saying is that the people should not be the ones to pay the bill it should be the insurance company that is paid to pay for these kind of things. Lets face it if you had to get this would you want to pay the whole price yourself while paying for insurance or would you want it paid for you. creator still gets compensation and the patient gets to see without giving up his/her home to get it.
by September 28, 2009 11:04 AM PDT
the link to the simulation is broken
Reply to this comment
by as901 September 29, 2009 6:33 AM PDT
There is another method that uses the tongue. A camera in eye glasses sends a signal that is sent to a plate that is pressed against the tongue. This does not require surgery, and it seems to work well. The brain learns to process signals from the tongue and send them to the minds visual centers.
Reply to this comment
by BrailleInstituteofAmerica September 30, 2009 7:30 AM PDT
Technology is an amazing thing. It is such a step forward in the way of sight loss, this will be amazing when insurance companies actually get on the ball and cover this for those with sight loss.
Reply to this comment
(12 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.