September 21, 2009 7:46 AM PDT

Are graphics all you're looking for in a Netbook?

by Scott Stein
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 8 comments

Will HD video make your Netbook?

(Credit: Nvidia)

We're weeks away from the Windows 7 launch, which is bringing along with it a collection of souped-up laptops and Netbooks that have been waiting for Microsoft's new operating system as their coming-out party.

In particular, this means that Netbooks paired with Nvidia Ion GPUs are going to be on their way soon enough. We've heard about these devices endlessly in teases from Lenovo, HP, Samsung, Asus, and of course Nvidia. The mobile GPU is essentially a GeForce 9400M processor--the one that's in Apple's MacBook lineup--but rebranded for Netbooks. This sounds great on paper, but for Netbooks it's being paired with an Atom processor, not a Core 2 Duo.

In demos we've seen, it will enable Netbooks to play HD video and even some mainstream 3D games. The Netbooks that will get Ions will all largely have the same Intel Atom N-series processors that current Netbooks have, but will benefit from added processing in some instances on the GPU, as well as the graphics boost. At the prices some of these new Netbooks are claiming they'll sell for--$399, for instance--it sounds like a decent deal.

But is a graphics boost the missing link for you, the laptop consumer? Is the Ion in fact a way to solve any frustrations you may have had with Netbooks up until this point? Or are you looking for better CPUs, keyboards, or other features? A few months ago we guessed at what future Netbooks could bring, and graphics certainly loomed large. But will a video-friendly Netbook provide enough oomph to be anything more than a secondary computer, and will such a device begin to supplant video-savvy smartphones as a traveling companion of choice? On the other hand, is the growing trend of thin-and-light laptops with ULV non-Atom processors of more interest?

We ask because we wonder if 11.6-inch Ion-powered Netbooks will in fact be the Holy Grail of the holiday season, or are simply a clever marketing campaign. Once we get our hands on a few, we'll let you know soon enough.

Scott Stein, a New York Jets fan and CNET senior associate editor, has written about tech, entertainment, video games, and viral culture for outlets including Laptop, Wired, Maxim, Esquire Online, Asylum, and Men's Journal. He also appears on the Digital City podcast. In his spare time, you might see him performing improv in New York City (when he's not being a dad).

Recent posts from Crave
Running World of Warcraft in Ubuntu Linux
Last-minute deal: Buy an Olive 4 or 4 HD, get the Beatles Remastered free
Reports: Panasonic battery to power homes for one week
Will the Apple tablet be a full-fledged computer?
New, terrifying, no-electronics U.S. flight security rules?
Apple's iSlate: What we know for sure
Best hardware and software add-ons for your PC
Kindle is most gifted Amazon item, ever
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (8 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Tedders85 September 21, 2009 8:44 AM PDT
I have large hands. My Asus EEE 900HA was wonderful and did everything I needed. It was just literally too small for me. The increased size of these netbooks is all I am really looking forward too, but the fact that the nVidia Ion is present instead of the Intel graphics is just a great added bonus.
Reply to this comment
by Wolfman-K September 21, 2009 10:10 AM PDT
yeah pretty much. I have a dell mini 9 and about the only thing I wish it could do but can't is play back/stream 720p video.
Reply to this comment
by vikinzer September 21, 2009 10:56 AM PDT
To be honest an Ion would take care of everything I am looking for in a Netbook that isn't already there. My current netbook is a secondary computing device because it makes sense as a secondary computing device. I have a desktop to play WoW and use Photoshop, and do major audio editing. I rarely need to do these things on the run (though WoW would be kinda nice), and so I don't want to pay to have all the horsepower necessary to perform those tasks minaturized/portableized if I don't have to. I am a dinosaur in that I still have a desktop. If I could watch streaming media reliably on my Netbook I would be completely a totally sold. My big concern is that everyone was waiting for Windows 7 to release these little darlings. I have no desire to run Windows on a netbook. It strikes me a stupid waste of resources on a secondary computing device. If these higher power machines don't come with Ubuntu then the manufacturer's can count our my consumer monies from their balance sheets.
Reply to this comment
by ppldiecomplex September 21, 2009 11:39 AM PDT
Personally, for me, the only thing that is holding me back from a laptop is the lack of a nice video card. It just wouldn't be worth buying one without the ability to use it as a quick and easy LAN machine. Right now you can buy laptops with nice video cards but you have to drop at least $1,000 into it to have a mediocre gaming machine. If I was able to buy a laptop with a GTS 8800 or equivilant, 2 GB of ram, and a 2.6 GHZ dual core CPU with a price tag of $700 or less I would be all over it. I don't see that happening any time soon but I'll keep my fingers crossed.
Reply to this comment
by dougbugl September 21, 2009 2:02 PM PDT
what gives, TI has an ARM chip ( OMAP3430 ) which does HD 720P video in less than 5Watts and this stuff dates back to early 2008? So is all that horsepower needed to run Windows just to get 720p video and if so, there's got to be a pretty big power cost for using so much to get so little.
Reply to this comment
by floor9 September 21, 2009 5:28 PM PDT
Graphics are the biggest reason why I haven't purchased a netbook yet. Give me the ability to watch full-screen HD video from Hulu, and a screen resolution of 1366x768 or better, and I'm in. A dual-core CPU would be nice, but isn't necessary.
Reply to this comment
by AerowsX October 8, 2009 4:39 PM PDT
Graphics aren't the only thing I'm looking for in a netbook, but I certainly won't buy one with anything less than ATI or NVidia. Intel's drivers are absolutely terrible, and can't be considered a viable 3D offering under any circumstance. The 4500mhd barely plays WoW, and WoW runs on just about anything.

I'm waiting for something Congo-based before I buy. If Congo doesn't have decent battery life, I'll be going with the ion platform. Intel needs to get out of the graphics chipset business if they aren't capable of doing any better than they are currently do. The GMA 500? Seriously?

I won't touch anything with Intel graphics. It's irrelevant if you get great battery life if you aren't able to actually have functionality. Barely being able to play movies and not even being able to play old, simple games is not my idea of functionality.
Reply to this comment
by Persico06 November 9, 2009 1:41 PM PST
I was going to buy a ASUS Eee PC Seashell: Intel Atom V280 @ 1.66GHz, CPU FSB 667MHz L2 Cache 512KB, 2GB Memory, a 320 HDD, Chipset Mobile Intel 945GM Express, Graphics Intel GMA 950 intergrated with Windows 7 Home Premium for $479.99 on Newegg, but I was worried the CPU might be upgraded soon, now I'll wait too for the mobile GPU and dual core. Thanks
Reply to this comment
(8 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.