• On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
September 9, 2009 3:03 PM PDT

Home Sharing is great, but where's our Apple home media server?

by Scott Stein
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 18 comments
Share
(Credit: creativeloafing.com)

As the relationship between the iPod, iPhone, and iTunes gets ever more complicated with apps, photo and video sharing, and iTunes 9 management options, one thing still remains clear: syncing with a computer, be it desktop or laptop, is still a pain in the butt. But sharing content between computers authorized under a shared iTunes account has just gotten a little easier.

Buried in Apple's press conference amid iPod and iTunes news was an announcement of Home Sharing, a service that will make transferring music and movies between the five computers that your content a simpler matter than it's ever been. Although Apple didn't demonstrate this feature extensively during the keynote, we hope it works as well as it sounds like it does. While enabling easier use of purchased content is a welcome idea, here's a better one: why not finally allow a user to create a home media server that all their computers and wireless devices can access seamlessly over Wi-Fi from anywhere in the world?

Such technology already exists via third-party software and hardware, but none of them work as easily as Apple's baked-in software. Services such as Spotify begin to tackle the problem via the cloud, but replicating existing technology has never stopped Apple before (see Time Capsule, for instance). But a media server is still a great idea for them to get behind...if only they would. We've been waiting since 2008, but news has gone dim on the server front.

If authorization is the concern, Apple can still restrict its server software to five machines. But freeing the iDevice from its slave computer is the true end goal, and the only way to get there is with a server.

Apple's Time Capsule and Apple TV have begun to explore elements of such a device, but neither allow seamless consolidation and storage access for media in the way that's truly needed. The Apple TV is a closed box and has limited storage space compared to the Time Capsule, but the Time Capsule doesn't have any media-sharing server software, making streaming content off it quite difficult, and certainly not seamless. Of course, there is the Mac Mini, which some say is Apple's missing media server. The problem is that the Mini isn't as single-purpose as a server could be...and its included storage capacity isn't server-size.

An Apple Media Box is the missing link, and would conceivably sell like hotcakes. So, where is it? And why did we spend all day watching demos of Nanos with cameras and FM radios instead?

Scott Stein, a New York Jets fan and CNET senior associate editor, has written about tech, entertainment, video games, and viral culture for outlets including Laptop, Wired, Maxim, Esquire Online, Asylum, and Men's Journal. He also appears on the Digital City podcast. In his spare time, you might see him performing improv in New York City (when he's not being a dad).
Recent posts from Crave
@Uh-oh: Twoddler lets toddlers send tweets
DARPA's giant red balloons officially at large
Download dozens of free holiday MP3s
Stereo vs. surround: And the winner is...
The 30 most anticipated games of 2010
ShirtsMyWay: Like The Sims, but for menswear
This week in Crave: The Cyber Saturday edition
The most beautiful cars in Los Angeles
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (18 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by DJ_Lae September 9, 2009 3:23 PM PDT
I would love to have a better way to stream iTunes content to my TV without having to drag my PC over and plug it in (which, admittedly, isn't a huge hassle with HDMI and a wireless keyboard/mouse).

I've got a PS3 and a 360 hooked up to my TV, and you'd think they could work something out there. Yes, there are solutions for non-DRM content, but if I want to watch a 99 cent movie rental or a TV show I've purchased, I'm SOL. Without having to buy an Apple TV, at least.

If they could figure something out that involved streaming the DRMed content from my computer to one of my consoles, I would be much more likely to buy stuff off their store.
Reply to this comment
by jjmfea September 9, 2009 6:19 PM PDT
Yeah, that is the holy grail. Really wish that I could hook my LCD TV up to a Airport Express, like I do with speakers through the house, and stream over the network, just like music. 'Coarse that would obviate the need for Apple TV.

But, a suggestion. I synch my movies, and TV shows to an ipod, and plug in the ipod to my TV using component video connectors. Yes, it's not quite the high-def experience that I'd like to have, but it beats a poke with a sharp stiick in the eye, and it beats hooking up my laptop to the TV, for convenience anyway.
by infomaniacnt September 10, 2009 6:34 PM PDT
The zune hd could do this, in hd quality
by cvaldes1831 September 9, 2009 3:50 PM PDT
There are two, maybe three missing links.

One is a mid-tier operating system placed between handheld devices (iPhone OS) and full-blown computers (Mac OS X). There is a hole between the two: something more capable than a battery-constrained device, yet less powerful than something that needs to run complicated interactive applications like GarageBand, Final Cut Pro, office applications, etc. Now that Snow Leopard has shipped, I believe Apple could focus software engineering efforts on this mid-tier OS.

The second is a cost-effective architecture. Apple's margins on the Apple TV are lousy, partly because it is using a relatively pricey four chip combination that is fairly limiting (hardware video acceleration is limited to 720p H.264 video). It is possible that P.A. Semi is working on an optimized SoC solution that would save silicon (i.e., dollars). The rumors say that P.A. Semi was split into two divisions: one working on a new handheld processor, the other working on something else (tablet SoC?).

From a content standpoint, Apple probably needs to renegotiate contracts, particularly with TV networks and movie studios before they can provide a more compelling video rental solution.
Reply to this comment
by dalellarson September 9, 2009 5:07 PM PDT
Funny, I put up two blog posts on these issues earlier today on http://dalelarson.com.

I found that the Time Capsule simply wouldn't work as reliable network attached storage for media. I was really hoping that today's announcements would recognize that tying media to individual machines was crazy in a world of Mac Book Air's, netbooks, iPhones, etc.

Where the media collection is larger than our drives, home sharing isn't a solution, it's another problem!
Reply to this comment
by streamline35 September 9, 2009 11:14 PM PDT
Buy another drive. Terabyte drives are quite cheap these days (as cheap as $85 on newegg), and even 2 terabyte drives can be had just barely north of $200
by David Turner September 9, 2009 5:19 PM PDT
Totally agree.... specially with how large media collections are getting now. 1 TB is not large enough for me and having it tied to one computer is stupid.

Equally I think the Mac line up has a gap between the iMac and the Mac Pro... something in the middle is needed.

@Cvaldes.. you say a mid-tier OS is needed... I am curious what would Apple use this for?
Reply to this comment
by Gadget70 September 9, 2009 5:43 PM PDT
Give me me an Apple media server with a 1TB hard drive and plug-in hard drive expandability via two extra hard drive slots. I can stick it in a closet somewhere and stream to all my devices at home and my mobile devices (iPhone, MacBook Pro). Please make it Apple and give it your Apple polish and I will buy it.
Reply to this comment
by John Elberling September 9, 2009 10:41 PM PDT
wha? anyone paying attention to what Apple actually did? doesn't sound like it. Home Server links all your media libraries with each other, to either stream or copy any or all of the content among them. therefore, there is no need for a separate dedicated server box, guys. that is obsolete thinking. if you have terabytes of media, just plug one or more cheap external drives into the computer(s) and load 'em up. it will work just fine as long as you add all content to an iTunes library.

and to stream your no-DRM media via web to anywhere in the world, just buy SimplifyMedia. sure, Apple should provide this capability itself, including the DRM stuff, but you don't need a dedicated server box to solve this problem today either.

likewise, Apple should let you plug your terabyte media drive into AppleTV's USB port as part of Home Server. that would pretty much be the same as a dedicated server box i guess. functionally tho there is little difference where you put that drive - it's all one LAN. i expect to see a major overhaul of AppleTV very soon, certainly tying it into Home Server among other things.
Reply to this comment
by MacAtlanta September 10, 2009 12:54 AM PDT
I wish they would start with prompting me when itunes defaults to my local vs my network storage library where I store a tb of music, movies, pictures, and tvshows! My AppleTV's see my mac mini but all of the content is stored on Buffalo Linkstation network attached storage drive that lives in a server closet it works really well accept with itunes on my mini reverts back to the local library location! Accept when itunes starts and the server is asleep? It ould be better if itunes actually ran on the the buffalo server and everything else used the home share? Suggestions?
Reply to this comment
by mayadanteamihan September 10, 2009 4:54 AM PDT
Spent all day? An hour or two is one day? It was over way before your lunchtime.
Reply to this comment
by Zsoldier September 10, 2009 5:53 AM PDT
I share my library via my NAS device at home, but there are issues with this setup. 1. Only one computer can access iTunes at a time. 2. I have a mix of Japanese and English music. Some of my Japanese songs do this 'mojibake' thing when opening on my Macs, but read fine on my Windows version of iTunes. I'm sure it's these type of things that are being investigated, not to mention a secure way to access your library over the internet and in a quick and simple way.
Reply to this comment
by GregoryCollins September 10, 2009 7:19 AM PDT
We "we spend all day watching demos of Nanos with cameras and FM radios instead" because millions and millions of people buy them. It is a much bigger market than the media server market.
Reply to this comment
by mrcrandell September 10, 2009 9:23 AM PDT
Although not the cheapest method (seeing that I built the entire computer), I have a dedicated computer that stores all of my music and then daily runs a copy program that syncs my entire music library to all of my other computers. For example, my laptop will download my music, then copy it to my main deskstop (daily), then that computer will sync up with the other computers in my house. With Vista and Windows 7, it also automatically updates the iTunes library. The added perk to this is that I can take any computer outside of my network and still access my music.
Reply to this comment
by Renegade Knight September 10, 2009 10:12 AM PDT
That's what the Apple TV should be.
Reply to this comment
by andrewrm September 10, 2009 10:56 AM PDT
That's exactly what I use my AppleTV for. It streams all my audio and video without a hitch with the caveat that my Mac must be on. I have Snow Leopard set up that my Mac will wake up when the network (Apple TV) requests it. It works just fine. I use power line networking to ensure a more reliable signal than WiFi.
Reply to this comment
by mectron September 10, 2009 4:17 PM PDT
The world does not need another grossly overpriced Apple junk in the living room. you can a Standalone media server/ player for 150$. A Apple on will then cost at least 1500$
Reply to this comment
by fhegner September 16, 2009 9:32 PM PDT
By hacking the Apple TV, you get close to what you need. I agree that you need more memory and 1 TB would be nice.

I just did a Boxee TV hack for the Apple TV and it's pretty nice. I'm trying to figure out if there is a hack for the Apple TV that gives you a fully functional internet browser....Anyone?
Reply to this comment
(18 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

The yogurt makers of tech: Gadgets to avoid

Don't buy these one-trick ponies--unless you like gizmos that gather dust.

Google wants to unclog Net's DNS plumbing

The Net giant, ever eager for a faster Internet, debuts its Google Public DNS service. With it, Google could become even more central to the Net.