September 6, 2009 6:15 AM PDT

Sony's 3D PlayStation 3: Hands-on photos

by Nate Lanxon
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 28 comments

Sony PlayStation 3D (Credit: Nate Lanxon/CNET)

BERLIN--We heard Sony was showing off a 3D PlayStation 3 here at IFA. Curious, we headed to the enormous Sony stand where we discovered a young boy--DualShock controller in-hand, 3D glasses mounted on his visibly excited face--playing the PS3's Wipeout racing game on a massive 3D television.

Naturally, we had to kick him off so we could have a play. For the next five minutes we blazed through the game's futuristic raceways with a perception of depth we've never experienced before, all presented in 1080p high-definition and vivid color. And in just more than a year, Sony told us, it expects to be selling the same experience in European stores.

Today, our experience involved a regular PS3. All the three-dimensional horsepower comes not from a modified PlayStation, or even special versions of its games--it's all down to some ingenious picture-processing  technology inside a new Bravia TV (currently a prototype). This means it should work with all existing PlayStation 3 games. At least, that's the intention.

At the end of 2010, Sony plans to release this 3D Bravia for use with its games console. But over the following two or three years, we were told, it wants to build the picture-processing technology into the PlayStation itself. That way, gamers will be able to enjoy 3D gaming on any high-def TV. Plans to incorporate the system into Blu-ray players, and even Vaio laptops, also exist.

The downside is that the picture-processing technology will only work for games--it requires computer-generated imagery to function, so can't currently be applied to movies and TV shows.

But would that stop you investing? Does a PlayStation 3D sound like your idea of gaming nirvana? Leave your thoughts below.

(Source: Crave UK)

Recent posts from Crave
Get freaky with samurai sword earbuds
The 404 Yuletide Mini-sode: Where The 404 is the Fifth Element
Running World of Warcraft in Ubuntu Linux
Last-minute deal: Buy an Olive 4 or 4 HD, get the Beatles Remastered free
Reports: Panasonic battery to power homes for one week
Will the Apple tablet be a full-fledged computer?
New, terrifying, no-electronics U.S. flight security rules?
Apple's iSlate: What we know for sure
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (28 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by man_is_man September 6, 2009 7:40 AM PDT
I recall when the current generation of councils were released, and many editors where disappointed on the lack of a major step forward. It's clearly apparent that those steps are now taking place, and I think we can all thank nintendo for raising the stakes.
Reply to this comment
by Earthquake152 September 6, 2009 12:01 PM PDT
Nintendo! Why Nintendo? I've tried the Wii, and I hate it! The motion sensor is all screwed up, and the normal controller of a Xbox 360 or PS3 is far better. But that's just my opinion. It could be that I just don't have enough practice, but to me, the games of the 360 and PS3 are far better and more fun.
by RedGiant947 September 6, 2009 2:48 PM PDT
Earthquake, while you may not personally enjoy the Wii and how it works, you have to at least acknowledge that it was a whole new step in gaming innovation that neither the 360 or PS3 provided. Because of the Wii's success, now companies are more likely to pursue even more technological advances in gaming which we can all agree is good.
by Earthquake152 October 9, 2009 9:55 PM PDT
Yeah, that's true. But I'm still never buying a Wii until they get better (in my mind) games!
by tommccrossin September 6, 2009 7:46 AM PDT
wow, this is unreal aha
Reply to this comment
by Shaymojack September 6, 2009 7:54 AM PDT
I'm still very unsure of 3D... I guess I'll have to see it to believe it.
Reply to this comment
by crasher7 September 6, 2009 8:51 AM PDT
I heard people say G-Force video game for the PS3 came with 3d glasses, isit true?
Reply to this comment
by Slick1of2 September 6, 2009 8:55 AM PDT
I think this would be fantastic. I'm really a PC gamer, but this kind of thing is exactly what every gamer wants. The more emersion the better. After playing 3D games for a long while and then having to go back to non 3D games, I am sure you will have a feeling that something very important is missing.
Reply to this comment
by sinn12 September 6, 2009 10:37 AM PDT
I just hope it's an optional setting, and not something that you have to have on. I am blind in one eye and have only been able to experience 3d on one occasion, at the Terminator ride in Universal Studios Florida.
Here is to hoping I can continue to game at all in the future.
Reply to this comment
by EvanSei September 6, 2009 6:35 PM PDT
I have said that 3D is a fad and I stick by that comment, It does not belong in the everyday T.V. world it's to impractical, but I will say that it is a good fit for the video game world, It is expected in the video game world to have to buy new and sometimes spendy equipment to get the desired effect and it is also expected to need to use different tools (controller, mic. ect..) so it would not be that inconvenient to have to buy and put on some 3D glasses. Of course beings that you must buy a new t.v. that of course will be overpriced, it is still to much of a fad and I predict it will not take off. The only way for it to take off in the video game world is if a new game station could be developed to play the 3D games and older games on a current t.v. way more convenient.
Reply to this comment
by Renegade Knight September 8, 2009 11:23 AM PDT
I'd rather see a 3D movie than 2D now. For my family at least the Fad is pretty solid.
by ZetaZeta_ September 10, 2009 11:14 PM PDT
Great 3D tech has existed since late last year with NVidia's solution.
GeForce 3D Vision

And it works for a lot of games, and the result is beautiful. Personally when gaming, the whole point of all our tech advanced in the realm of graphics have been to add realism, however that caps out when you are still working with a flat screen.
"3D is a fad" - That's a bad assessment to make, imo. It'll just get cheaper and look better, and it's simple the natural evolution of video technology. It provides realism that will hit a ceiling with just flat photorealism.
by dreamhunk September 7, 2009 5:33 AM PDT
pc gaming already has 3D of wait the writer of this article plays on consoles. You can really tell a pc gamer from a console gamer because cnsole gamers know jack about pc gaming.
Reply to this comment
by ewgdsg September 7, 2009 5:41 AM PDT
probably because their a console gamer..
by Ryan_R September 7, 2009 5:47 AM PDT
It's shame that there's no way to show off 3D in video reviews - only personal experience or blind faith can lead to a purchase of this equipment.
Reply to this comment
by ZetaZeta_ September 10, 2009 11:14 PM PDT
YouTube has a 3D function now, lol.
by dribble343 September 7, 2009 6:02 AM PDT
I've recently bought the Nvidia 3D tech and the stereo 3D on the right games is jaw dropping.
Reply to this comment
by Saint_Kamus September 7, 2009 4:06 PM PDT
Whoever wrote this article needs to dig deeper, i think you're pretty much wrong about almost everything here.

"it's all down to some ingenious picture-processing technology inside a new Bravia TV"

No... No way in hell, this has to come from the PS3 itself, and at the heavy cost of twice the rendering power, since you need a different perspective for each eye. (in other words this is very much impossible on games that are already pushing the PS3 in any way, such as memory limits, CPU, GPU, etc.)

"This means it should work with all existing PlayStation 3 games. At least, that's the intention."

Nope, no way in hell either. at least not in a regular PS3... who knows if the PS3 slim is capable though, since after all it could easily be 2x faster than the old bulky PS3 because of the smaller chips, however this would still leave lots of compatibility issues on many games.

Anyone that has any basic understanding on how true 3d works knows this, should get your facts straight before you post an article that pretty much seems like alchemy.

Games developed with 3d glasses in mind are going to look best, since there will be no pesky UI issues, and developers will exploit pop out properly this way.

So in a nutshell, you guys got your facts wrong, or the guy (guys) presenting the PS3 3D had no clue what they were talking about. (i'm leaning towards this one.) at lest when it comes to how the games will do 3d, not doubting their TV specs or type of glasses here.
Reply to this comment
by Renegade Knight September 8, 2009 11:26 AM PDT
That's a nice long post about a simple thing. Sony uses a 3D TV that makes the job of 3D easier via the 3D PS3. They said in the future they would like to make the PS3 do all the processing so any TV would work with 3D.

Pretty simple eh?
by tipoo_ September 7, 2009 7:54 PM PDT
Is there any reason why a regular 120hz HDTV (i know 60hz wont work for 3d) wouldnt be able to display 3D images to people wearing the specialized glasses? I mean, Sony's push is that their T.V can make ANY content into 3D, which obviously most TV's cant, but if the original source was a 3D image than why not?
Reply to this comment
by mdvr613 September 8, 2009 5:22 AM PDT
As I posted before; the PS3 is able to do this on it's own. This was presented to all Playstation QORE users about 4 to 5 months ago with Burn Out Paradise and also seen with GranTurismo5 early this year at CES 2009.

As for the information provided that the TV would be the one processing the image, well... I can't see that happening. From information that has been floating around for almost a year now the PS3 will work with a 120hz HDTV and a pair of glasses.... This is also based on information of the Nvidia card already in the system and Nvidia's current HD3D Vision.

While a informative article Mr. Lanxon, I think there is more information out there that not only would find your article out dated... but would also contradict such.
Reply to this comment
by Renegade Knight September 8, 2009 11:28 AM PDT
Given he didn't go into detail on the hows and whys of the 3D I think he's ok. It's enough to note that it's something they are looking into for mass consumption. That's the point of the article. A white paper on 3D using Existing PS3's is another thing.
by mdvr613 September 9, 2009 6:14 PM PDT
Agree... last part of my comment was unnecessary. My apologize.
by aby26 September 9, 2009 8:58 AM PDT
THIS IS SOMETHING NEW FOR PS3 AND LOOKING FORWARD TO THIS.BUT THEY ARE SAYING THAT YOU HAVE TO BUY A SPECIAL BRAVIA HDTV WHICH I THINK WILL BE VERY COSTLY N WILL WIPE OUT YOUR POCKETS. SONY SHOULD PUT THIS TECHNOLOGY IN PS3 ITSELF SO THAT ONE CAN PLAY IT ON ANY HDTV. GOD OF WAR 3 IN 3D ?.
Reply to this comment
by aby26 September 9, 2009 9:00 AM PDT
THIS IS SOMETHING NEW FOR PS3 AND LOOKING FORWARD TO THIS.BUT THEY ARE SAYING THAT YOU HAVE TO BUY A SPECIAL BRAVIA HDTV WHICH I THINK WILL BE VERY COSTLY N WILL WIPE OUT YOUR POCKETS. SONY SHOULD PUT THIS TECHNOLOGY IN PS3 ITSELF SO THAT ONE CAN PLAY IT ON ANY HDTV. GOD OF WAR 3 IN 3D ?.
Reply to this comment
by jakemilwaukee September 11, 2009 1:01 PM PDT
whats worse than a post in all caps???posting it twice.
by roachbrain September 9, 2009 10:25 AM PDT
I sure hope this is integrated into the PS3 as an update. Not sure how it works but Dead Space in 3D would so be the ultimate in a dark room play threw.
Reply to this comment
by mikemc3 November 23, 2009 8:00 AM PST
They seriously need to fix 3D technology first before I would be interested. Tried the various 3d tech fads in the past and the results were very disappointing. You look at the image from ANYWHERE other directly in front or if the image is off on the side of the screen the image splits. And it is seriously headache inducing.

Purchased some 3D Gaming glasses a couple years back at a computer show. They had Microsoft Flight-Sim as a demo game. Took the thing home and of my entire library of games it only worked on 2 of them. Was a complete waste of money.

I wish Sony luck, but will definitely be buyer beware.
Reply to this comment
(28 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.