• On MovieTome: The next Marvel mutant movie?
September 4, 2009 10:48 AM PDT

Frankencamera is open source, runs on Linux

by Leonard Goh
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 9 comments
Frankencamera

Marc Levoy, a Stanford professor of computer science and electrical engineering, is the son, grandson, and great-grandson of opticians. Holding the Frankencamera, which is programmable and can be connected to the Internet, is graduate student Andrew Adams.

(Credit: L.A. Cicero/Stanford University)

Photo scientists at Stanford University's Computer Graphics Laboratory have conceived of what is probably the world's first open-source camera. Their contraption, dubbed the Frankencamera, consists of a Nokia N95 mobile phone camera module; a circuit board; a couple of lenses from Canon; and Linux for all the open-source goodness.

Frankencamera

The current prototype of the Frankencamera is constructed from off-the-shelf parts.

(Credit: Stanford University)

The current prototype of the Frankencamera is constructed from off-the-shelf parts, in some cases borrowed from dead cameras. Its creators say it's ugly--thus the name.

Now, you may be wondering what the big deal is about having an open-source operating system on cameras. Well, it means programmers can create algorithms to process images differently or even better than what brands such as Canon and Nikon are currently offering.

An open-source platform will also give savvy users a wide range of customization options. For instance, photojournalists can program their dSLRs to activate certain settings when a particular lens or accessory is attached.

For now, the scientists have tweaked their Frankencamera to snap high dynamic range pictures, but they are trying to make their snapper churn out better-quality videos by using high-resolution pictures. In a year, they hope to distribute the platform at minimal cost to computational photography researchers and courses worldwide. Check out the video for more details.

(Source: Crave Asia)

Recent posts from Crave
Passive-aggressive gifts for chronically late geeks
Looking under Nissan's Leaf
Micro Four Thirds firmware fun
Prizefight: Samsung Behold II vs. HTC Droid Eris
Stuff your stockings with iPod accessories
Grow a garden in BenQ's LED monitor
Verizon iPhone rumors are just rumors
Differentiation leads to fragmented, confused Android
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (9 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by sartor1 September 4, 2009 11:30 AM PDT
Brilliant! Canon, Nikon et al, won't be happy! They make money every time you buy a new camera back just to upgrade to a larger sensor!
Reply to this comment
by Jourdy288 September 4, 2009 12:05 PM PDT
Yeah, if only we could shrink this Frankencamera... Still, this is progress, like OpenPandora and others. Open source will thrash closed source senseless!
Reply to this comment
by terminalblue September 4, 2009 12:44 PM PDT
this seems like a great idea, until it become competitive. if "big camera" gets wind that a there is an affordable and user upgradeable camera available, they WILL start to lock down their hardware. i think most of the large companies would be pleased if the Sigma's of the world had to make their kit DMCA compliant (also, its prolly headed that way anyway).
Reply to this comment
by jaguar717 September 5, 2009 4:15 AM PDT
You mean like with lenses and flashes and tripods and film/memory and battery packs and raw formats?
Oh wait, those all moved towards infinitely swappable combinations. Funny how competition works.

Mass market anything tends to be more rigid and less modular because it's sold as an appliance to people who want simple functionality and not heavy customization. The higher end "enthusiast" market always has more support for aftermarket fiddling.

Camry vs. Mustang.
Glock vs 1911.
Commodity PC with integrated-everything vs. Alienware.
Pocket camera vs. professional SLR.
by inachu1 September 4, 2009 1:19 PM PDT
Nice idea.
But will the camera be as cheap?
Nobody will pay for this if the camera will cost as much as a similar quality camera.
Reply to this comment
by Jack Gratteau September 4, 2009 3:09 PM PDT
Why expend all that effort on a tiny CMOS imager? It will never be better than any other "pinhole" camera, no matter what the resolution. If you wish to play with a true Linux based camera, look into JAI's model BB-500, see http://www.jai.com/EN/CameraSolutions/Products/Pages/BB-500GE.aspx

It is a half-scale format (2/3"), RGB Bayer progressive scan imager with either Camera Link or GiGeVision ethernet connections. If you have the bigger bucks, there is a 16MP imager as well.
Reply to this comment
by LinuxRules September 5, 2009 2:07 AM PDT
I hate to bust their bubble but this has been out for a couple of years...

http://www3.elphel.com/products
Reply to this comment
by fokkwp September 22, 2009 3:06 PM PDT
http://blogs.elphel.com/2009/09/elphel-and-stanford-frankencamera/
by gbraad September 6, 2009 1:55 AM PDT
Nice idea, but we already have the LeopardBoard (http://leopardboard.org/) from Leopard Imaging. Also completely open source, also based on a TI ARM (TMS320DM355 DaVinci), costs only $99 and has interchangeable CCD's (from VGA, 1.5M to 5M)... and also the community has a close relationship with the BeagleBoard.
Reply to this comment
(9 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

The browser battles go on and on

roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.

3G wireless still holds promise

The next generation of 4G wireless may get all the headlines, but advanced 3G technology will likely dominate services for the next few years.