• On TechRepublic: Windows 7 report card: Hits and misses
September 1, 2009 5:21 PM PDT

Panasonic set to unleash 85-inch 1080p plasma for $30,000

by David Carnoy
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 24 comments

The TH-85PF12U is the size of four 42-inch displays put together.

(Credit: Panasonic)

Large plasmas are coming down in price, but if you want to go big--and I mean really big--you still have to pay dearly. Set to hit next month, the $30,000 TH-85PF12U is billed by Panasonic as the industry's first 85-inch, full-HD, 1080p plasma. It's the size of four 42-inch plasmas stitched together.

Panasonic says that thanks to its newly developed Neo plasma display panel technology, "even with effective wide-screen dimensions of 74.4 inches by 41.8 inches, the TH-85PF12U is significantly thinner and lighter than past plasmas, with a main body depth of 3.9 inches and an overall weight of approximately 260 pounds."

Typically, extra-large plasmas just haven't cut it in terms of picture quality, but this model sounds--or rather, looks--more promising. Panasonic's NeoPDP technology has proven, at least in smaller Panasonic plasmas, to produce a great picture while using much less energy.

As for the $30,000 price tag, all we can say is that if you're not a multimillionaire with cash to burn, wait a few years. You'll probably be able to pick this baby up for 15 grand soon enough.

Comments?

Hunkered down in New York City, Executive Editor David Carnoy covers the gamut of gadgets and writes his Fully Equipped column, which carries the tag line "The electronics you lust for." He's also the author of "Knife Music," a novel. E-mail David. Follow David on Twitter.
Recent posts from Crave
Hands-on with the Manfrotto Modopocket
Windows, Netbook. Android, smartbook? Hmm
Crave giveaway of the day: Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 digital camera
iFotoGuide nature photography guides for the iPhone
Hands-on with Ilford's Gold Silk inkjet paper
Fancy a free phone?
Inside CNET Labs Podcast 71: 'Very' good at counting!
Digital City Podcast 60: Attack of Cyber Monday!
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (24 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by hightechfanboy September 1, 2009 6:19 PM PDT
Wow, just wow. Too bad am not a multimillioner and am gonna have to wait. But the second it hits $10,000. I'll buy one( by the time it cost that I hopefully have save that much, 2 years maybe?)
Reply to this comment
by EvanSei September 1, 2009 7:03 PM PDT
I want it....ALLOT oh what $30,000 no thank you I can wait for the monster t.v.
Reply to this comment
by kormiko September 1, 2009 7:21 PM PDT
Cut that price down to $3,000 and you got yourself a deal. ;)

Cut it to $300 and I'll buy more than one.

Sound good? Great.
Reply to this comment
by Rod Roddy September 2, 2009 2:25 PM PDT
I second that notion :D
by dodgeman007 September 1, 2009 7:52 PM PDT
wow what a waste, for that cost i can buy a NICE 4K projector that will give me FOUR (4) 1080P displays each close to that size... someone will be stupid enough to buy it just to make up for something else....
Reply to this comment
by Alba-tross September 2, 2009 5:00 AM PDT
Jerry Jones got a better deal...
Reply to this comment
by bowenthebeard September 2, 2009 5:48 AM PDT
So... the resolution is going to be like, what, 1-pixel-per-square-inch? At this scale, I don't think HD would be enough anymore We need some XHD going on.
Reply to this comment
by robertorosco September 2, 2009 8:40 AM PDT
With a resolution of 1920 x 1080, we can use the pythagorean theorem to calculate the number of pixels in diagonal formation, which equates to about 2202.9071 or 2,203 pixels.

2203/85 = 25.92 or 26 is the number of pixels per inch on this 85" screen.
2203/42 = 52.45 or 52 is the number of pixels per inch on your typical 1080P 42" plasma.

52/26 = 2
26/52 = 0.5

2/.5 = 4 What this basically boils down to is that for every four 42" plasma pixels (stacked 2x2), you get one big 85" plasma pixel.

You're welcome. :)
Reply to this comment
by moviegeek65 September 2, 2009 1:06 PM PDT
Good point and you would have to sit about 20 feet away to enjoy it.
by coprophilous September 2, 2009 3:52 PM PDT
Hmm. Or, you could just note that 1 85" TV = about 4 42" TVs (as noted directly in the first paragraph of the article) and skip the rest of the pretentious, unnecessary math...
by jhstoneca September 2, 2009 7:52 PM PDT
Only the ignorant would call a math lesson this eloquent pretentious. I read hundreds of comments on these articles each week rarely have I learned as much as I did from your post. Thank you.

@Coprophilous your name is appropriate because you are a huge *********
by mike_garcia September 2, 2009 9:13 AM PDT
HMMMM yup this should definitely get us out of the recession...
Reply to this comment
by FATRAT1970 September 3, 2009 7:53 AM PDT
MAYBE WE COULD GET SOME CASH FOR CLUNKERS LIKE $ 8000 FOR OUR OLD 32 INCH CRT TV TOWARDS THE 85 INCH PLASMA
by scifidaddyo September 2, 2009 9:41 AM PDT
The only type of persont that would be stupid enough to buy this thing are those who just want to say, 'i've got an 85 inch plasma'. Seriously. if you have 30,000 spend 15,000 on a super high end projector and the other 15,000 on high end audio/video and you'll have yourself a system with great sound and larger picture. And it won't have to worry about 260 pounds falling off the wall.
Reply to this comment
by Burton September 2, 2009 9:51 AM PDT
I would sure have an easier time moving this compared to the hunk of junk I had to help move for a friend. He had a Sony 40" XBR TUBE TV. Weighs about the same as this 85" Panasonic.
Reply to this comment
by skatingrocker17 September 2, 2009 12:11 PM PDT
I VANT ONE
Reply to this comment
by planblove September 2, 2009 12:13 PM PDT
Just get an HD projector and a nice clean white wall to show it on. You can get close to this size for a fraction of this price.
Reply to this comment
by Bowen88 September 2, 2009 1:23 PM PDT
Obviously this isn't targeted at us common folks.

Yeah, if I had the room and money I'd buy a few of these and couldn't care less about what people have to say about it. I'm heading out to buy a lottery ticket right now.
Reply to this comment
by blager September 2, 2009 3:59 PM PDT
When are movie theatres going to change from out of focus projection to plasma????
Reply to this comment
by pnamajck October 26, 2009 3:53 PM PDT
blager . . . from what i heard a couple years ago . . . costs twenty times more ($200,000) for one digital projector than for analog film projector. that in itself is no biggie.

the problem is . . . the digital projectors last only 10,000 hours . . . while film projectors last . . . well, 200,000 hours.

guess eventually things will level out . . . if humanity survives that long.
by QA_Tester September 2, 2009 10:06 PM PDT
I'd bee hard pressed to see the need for it for most people. Not to say it won't sell. 10-12 years ago 50" plasma was 25K Now one could be found for less than 2K
Reply to this comment
by KevinXI September 11, 2009 12:04 AM PDT
If i walked into some one's house and saw that thing, it would scare the crap out of me.
Reply to this comment
by davecann2 September 11, 2009 5:22 AM PDT
I'd buy one... Oh wait... There is no way I can get it home in the back of my SUV!

ummm... maybe I can strap it to the roof?
Reply to this comment
by gedalneil September 12, 2009 1:38 PM PDT
Kevin Miller of TweakTV was able to get some primary color readings off of the 85 inch panel. Not too impressive it seems. http://www.tweaktv.com/the-kevin-miller-channel/panasonic-th-85pf12u-first-look-with-primary-colors.html
Reply to this comment
(24 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

S.F. hacker space: Heaven for the DIY set?

The Noisebridge hacker space offers sewing and Mandarin classes, soldering workshops, Internet-controlled front door access, and a server room with no door.
• Photos: Circuits, code, community

The browser battles go on and on

roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.