• On TechRepublic: Windows 7: Slower to boot than Vista?
August 18, 2009 12:50 PM PDT

Sony officially announces $299 PS3 Slim

by David Carnoy
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 392 comments
Sony PS3 Slim (Credit: Sony)

Updated coverage: Read CNET's full review of the PS3 Slim

Sony on Tuesday finally took the wraps off the much-rumored PS3 Slim and gave it the more affordable $299 price tag consumers have been clamoring for.

Sony Computer Entertainment CEO Kaz Hirai performed the unveiling at a press conference in Cologne, Germany, preceding the opening of the Gamescom Expo. He took the stage and announced the PS3 was "getting a new model" and that, indeed, it was called the PS3 Slim.

The Slim is hitting stores September 1 in North America and Europe and will cost $299 (or for those who live in regions, 299 euros or 29,980 yen). Hirai says the device has the same features and functions as the "old" PS3 but is 33 percent smaller, 36 percent lighter, and comes with a 120GB hard drive. (See photo comparison here).

Sony says that to achieve the new form factor, the internal design architecture of the new PS3 system has been completely redesigned--"from the main semiconductors and power supply unit to the cooling mechanism."

The PS3 Slim is powered by a new 45nm version of the Cell processor, which runs at the same speed as the 60nm processor in the "old" PS3 but is smaller and more energy efficient. According to company reps, power consumption for the Slim has also been cut to two-thirds, "helping to reduce fan noise," which is important.

On the cosmetic front, this model has a textured surface finish that gives the PS3 a fresh, casual look that the company hopes will make it more appealing to a wider audience (read: casual gamers). As previously rumored, the PS3 logo has undergone a redesign and Sony's changing the PS3 brand name from "PLAYSTATION 3" to "PlayStation 3" (we've actually been calling it the PlayStation 3 for a while).

Like the 80GB and 160GB models, the 120GB PS3 Slim has built-in Wi-Fi and two USB ports (sorry, Sony didn't add IR or backwards compatibility for PS2 games). You can also upgrade/replace the hard drive without voiding the warranty, though Sony has moved the hard drive from the side of the unit to the front for "easier access." (To remove the hard drive, you simply unscrew two screws). The one feature missing from the Slim is the ability to install another operating system (i.e., Linux)--Sony is doing away with that feature.

Kaz Hirai unveils the PS3 Slim in Cologne, Germany.

(Credit: GameSpot)

With earlier PS3s, you could prop your unit up vertically or lay it down horizontally. Out of the box, the Slim is only designed to be used in a horizontal position, but Sony will sell a $24 stand that allows you to stand it up vertically.

In making the move to the PS3 Slim, Sony will be upgrading the firmware to 3.00 and phasing out its legacy 80GB and 160GB models, selling them for $299 and $399 respectively.

John Koller, director of hardware marketing for Sony Computer Entertainment America, says they've been able to run down inventory of older models, but he didn't have the best answer as to why someone would buy an old 80GB model over the new 120GB Slim. "Some people want a unit right away and they may like the look of the old unit," he said. "People will have their reasons for wanting one."

Updated at 7:15 a.m. PDT with Brian Tong's First Look video.

The following product mentioned is available.

On Sale Now: $299.99
View the latest prices for Sony PlayStation 3 Slim (120GB)

Hunkered down in New York City, Executive Editor David Carnoy covers the gamut of gadgets and writes his Fully Equipped column, which carries the tag line "The electronics you lust for." He's also the author of "Knife Music," a novel. E-mail David. Follow David on Twitter.
Recent posts from Crave
This week in Crave: The Black Saturday edition
Palm Pixi now just $25 at Amazon, Wal-Mart
U.S. Mazda2 launching at Los Angeles Auto Show
Seize Seesmic Twitter app on BlackBerry, Android
T-Mobile holiday gift: Aggressive unlimited prepaid plans
U.S. Cellular adds overage protection service
Holiday gaming on the cheap
The Droid and hands-free voice dialing
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 10 pages (392 Comments)
by Byteme2009 August 18, 2009 11:03 AM PDT
Well it will be interesting to see what Microsoft fires back with.
Reply to this comment
by geekbully August 18, 2009 11:06 AM PDT
I don't think they have too...
by Byteme2009 August 18, 2009 11:10 AM PDT
@ geekbully - no, Microsoft doesn't HAVE to, but at $299 Sony is going to ship quite a few units. Microsoft has done well at maintaining the lead in the next gen console wars, particularly in the U.S., and they certainly wouldn't want to lose any momentum. I have a PS3 (160gb), and would have bought a 360 Elite maybe as well if the price wasn't still so high. People who don't have either system may well be swayed toward the PS3 at $299.
by Absolution2009 August 18, 2009 11:12 AM PDT
Market competition is awesome. I think Xbox 360 will drop to $249.99 but that's way worse than what PS3 offers with their pricing.

In the end, it will be about personal preference and games. Wait until Tokyo's Game Show (TGS). I think though, Sony has the edge this year significantly.

I really want to see where they are with Final Fantasy Versus XIII (PS3 Exclusive). It's hard to find details on this that's not repetitive. Will they announce it at TGS?
by Jawknee1 August 18, 2009 11:24 AM PDT
Even if MS does drop the price the 360 Elite to $299 or even $249, its still too high. honestly if you see a PS3 next to a 360 Elite for the same price why in the hell would you buy a 360 Elite? It doesnt have any great exclusives. Halo got old in 2005, Gears, not my kind of game but i can see why other like it, Forza? all i haveto say is GT5/GT PSP. Seriously, most good quality stand alone Blue ray players will run you 300+. $299 for a PS3 is a steal. Blue Ray/gameing/media/computer. Cant go wrong.
by tcr071 August 18, 2009 11:34 AM PDT
They are already dropping the Elite to $299 and the Pro to $199.99. I think we'll see the Arcade at $149.99. Don't think Microsoft will really need to do anything else. You'll still be able to get a Microsoft gaming console for half as much as the PS3.
by Jawknee1 August 18, 2009 11:43 AM PDT
MS is discontinuing the Pro model.
by Jawknee1 August 18, 2009 11:45 AM PDT
"You'll still be able to get a Microsoft gaming console for half as much as the PS3."

and it will still he less then half the console the PS3 is and will still be a Piece of crap. New stats, 54% failure rate. Pathetic. The only thing more pathetic is that fact people still buy that piece of junk.
by viper396 August 18, 2009 12:35 PM PDT
@Jawknee1. No, the only thing more pathetic are fanboys ineffectively trying to sell game consoles using a bunch of made up statistics and FUD. You only made your statements worthless.
If you like your PS3 so much, go play it. It's not your job or responsibility to convince others which console to buy.
by chonnom August 18, 2009 1:17 PM PDT
@viper396

Surprisingly he didn't make up the failure rate for the 360. I say surprising because, well, no person in their right mind would buy a product that has over 50% chance of dying on you soon after you purchase it...

http://gamer.blorge.com/2009/08/18/xbox-360-failure-rate-over-50-percent-ps3-wii-more-reliable/
http://consumerist.com/5338852/xbox-360-failure-rate-is-542-percent-game-informer-finds
by CA1900 August 18, 2009 1:34 PM PDT
After watching my computer get royally screwed up by Sony's rootkit that they embedded on their music CDs, and their blatant lies after they were caught, I've vowed never to give Sony my business ever again. Both are nice enough consoles, but giving money to Sony is a deal-breaker for me.
See more comment replies
by chriscooksey August 18, 2009 11:03 AM PDT
Finally.............Ratchet and Clank here I come...
Reply to this comment
by jon345111 August 18, 2009 11:04 AM PDT
Finally sony, I'll be snatching one of these bad boys up come Sept!
Reply to this comment
by monkeyfun14 August 18, 2009 11:04 AM PDT
Eh if im not mistaken the PS2 slims are space heaters. I've had one that would burn my hands if I touched it. More powerful hardware same small case where does the heat go?
Reply to this comment
by Byteme2009 August 18, 2009 11:15 AM PDT
I have a PS2 and to be honest I don't remember any issues with excessive heat. I keep all my electronics pretty well ventilated though. They said that the slim will use less power so theoretically you would have less heat given off anyway. Not sure how they are saving the power though, but then again I am no electronics genius!
by Glassner_S August 18, 2009 11:25 AM PDT
The Xbots aren't even making any sense trying to do damage control!

LOL!
by monkeyfun14 August 18, 2009 11:34 AM PDT
@Glassner_S

Double post and maybe mine was defective. I've also never owned an xbox.
by cloudmatt August 18, 2009 12:00 PM PDT
@byteme.
less power does mean less heat. I don't know the stats off hand but for quick reference the slim being designed and built after time has passed from the original means that the processor/ram can be built with the newer thinner circuit tech. this results in a lower wattage and less thermal output.
I don't have a ps3 or x-box of any variety I would probably buy a ps3 for a cheap BD player+. As for the x-box I admit it's a gaming powerhouse valve friendly and a cool community, too bad I can play most of the games I'm interested in on my Pc with out monthly x-box live fees.
by jmchien August 18, 2009 12:29 PM PDT
I'm pretty sure the heat issue will be okay since the Cell processor has gone through some revisions (so i've heard), which means it's more efficient (which is why it is also cheaper)... it don't think Sony would have released a slimmer version if heat was a problem (they've learned from MS and from the PS2)
by Slabtown August 18, 2009 12:54 PM PDT
Yes, you're mistaken.
by ITpsycho August 19, 2009 10:13 AM PDT
@byteme.
"too bad I can play most of the games I'm interested in on my Pc with out monthly x-box live fees"

What monthly fees? I pay once a year and for the sheer number of other players to interact with vs those available on the PC (yeah, I'm a Comrade user) makes it totally worth it. I pay occasionally for some DLC or games I directly download but - monthly? ***?

Regarding the PS3 Slim and the pricing - when the first $600 plus models came out and then the offering lines and prices changed, then changed again, the current pricing is what I and many others hoped for - the slightly damning thing is the lack of support for the PS2 games. Sony, MS, HP, Acer, Gateway - I don't care who makes the box or console, I just like playing games. Some games I loved on the PC stink on the 360 and others I loved on the 360 totally suck on the PC. Adding a PS3 at these prices is a no-brainer for many gamers who love playing games much more than being stuck on MS or Sony or whatever. I don't think Sony ever intended to be profitable on PS3 console sales in the first two, perhaps three years but to make money on game licensing fees. The staying power of the PS2 systems and games is obvious testament to Sony's staying power. This price drop for a more energy efficient model is a good strategy and while it might not be a "Microsoft/Nintendo Killer" it is a very easy and simple choice for many gamers. I really love the 360 and the games available for it but I'm absolutely adding the slim PS3 to the mix.

Real gamers don't defend MS or Sony or Nintendo or Apple or Linux or anyone else, we just game on.
by zigzagzip00 August 18, 2009 11:05 AM PDT
FINALLY, it's about FRIGGIN' time. Even though the newer model is smaller and cheaper, I still think the older one looks better.
Reply to this comment
by heygeo August 18, 2009 1:12 PM PDT
i like the new form factor but I would haver preferred it shiny... the new texture makes it look flat out cheap and disposable.
by steve5200 August 18, 2009 3:36 PM PDT
Ugly as hell. My current PS3 looks so much nicer.
by yahoo!!! August 18, 2009 4:40 PM PDT
your so right
by SteveW928 August 19, 2009 8:20 AM PDT
I agree... it LOOKS much cheaper now to go along with the price drop. The old one was almost like a piece of furniture, beautiful and elegant. Since I have mine in a cabinet anyway though, I guess it doesn't matter that much. I'd like the reduced power consumption a LOT. Tradeoffs. If I were buying a new one, I'd be hard pressed between getting the old one at reduced price or waiting for the new model.

This is GREAT news in general though. The old PS3 was well worth the price, now it is a super bargain. If I get a bit of extra cash saved up, I might eventually buy a new one to use as a dedicated game host system. Kudos Sony!
by Byteme2009 August 18, 2009 11:06 AM PDT
I have a feeling you may see some good deals on the 80gb units coming up as well lol
Reply to this comment
by blusky08 August 18, 2009 4:01 PM PDT
Problem is that the PS3 Slim will not be any more future proof than the current model if it does not include HDMI 1.4, which includes many new capabilities and a new connector. 3D games, movies and HDTVs are scheduled to come out full force this coming year as well as HDTVs with increased internet capabilities--all of which HDMI 1.4 is spec'd for compatibility.
by BCF1968 August 18, 2009 10:04 PM PDT
@ blusky08

You realize that the 360 only has HDMI 1.2 that's even less future proof. By the time HDMI 1.4 becomes the "norm" it'll be time for the PS4 and XBOX 720.
by earthboundloveship August 18, 2009 11:21 PM PDT
i was thinking the same thing, until i read the rest of the article...
"In making the move to the PS3 Slim, Sony will be upgrading the firmware to 3.00 and phasing out its legacy 80GB and 160GB models, selling them for $299 and $399 respectively."
so you basically get a 160gb that looks kinda cheap or pay the same price for half the memory but a BA looking machine. ill take features over looks personally (also a reason i dont own an ipod)

but im still very happy though, been waiting for this for a long time :)
by SteveW928 August 19, 2009 8:24 AM PDT
@ blusky08 -

Unless you're just waiting around for the 'future' to start your entertainment system building.... I don't think anyone I know... or myself... give a cr*p about HDMI 1.4. I'm certainly not buying a new TV for a good number of years, and haven't really seen anything compelling that that the newer HDMI specs accomplish that I have any use for. I'm guessing 95% of people would say the same.
by blusky08 August 19, 2009 3:14 PM PDT
Not suggesting anyone wait to build their dream system, simply that the way the PS3 has been touted as being so future-proof it would be a simple move to include HDMI 1.4. The PS3 will only be half-way through its lifecycle before HDMI begins to gain importance. Add to that Sony's recent pledge to start bringing 3D to the PS3. Just sayin'...
by SteveW928 August 21, 2009 11:56 AM PDT
@ blusky08 -

I think if people talk about 'future proof' in regard to the PS3 (I've never actually heard anyone say that... but I suppose people do), they are saying it in relation to the other consoles... as a figure of speech... not literally. No technology is future proof. The PS3 is just designed for a LOT longer lifespan than the other systems on the market. Sure, HDMI is really starting to take hold, but there really isn't much need for a v 1.4 port until there are some v1.4 devices around to connect it to. Right? I'm sure just about any PS3 will be dead (or replaced by a PS4 or PS5) long before there is a need for v1.4 ports. I'd guess Sony will release the next console within 5 years or so. Is anyone even fully using their 1.3a ports yet?
by matthewp131 August 18, 2009 11:07 AM PDT
will it have a power brick?
Reply to this comment
by monkeyfun14 August 18, 2009 11:15 AM PDT
Why does everyone always get hung up on the power brick? With how many people who ask about it i'm starting to think im doing it wrong by putting them by the back of the device.
by kylecca August 18, 2009 11:22 AM PDT
this is one of the ways to have a slim model with out having the power supply inside the ps3 it would look the same size like the ps2.
by Jawknee1 August 18, 2009 11:29 AM PDT
i believe the power source will remain inside. Sony has never created a console with and exterior power supply. Nintendo and MS onthe other hand....
by monkeyfun14 August 18, 2009 11:35 AM PDT
@Jawknee1

The PS2 Slim had a power brick.
by Mergatroid Mania August 18, 2009 11:45 AM PDT
Wall warts or power bricks suck. Being a technologist who repairs this type of equipment every day, I can tell you I would NEVER buy anything that uses an external power supply, with the exception of hand held devices that make use of external chargers.

External supplies are never the same quality as internal supplies, and have no cooling with the possible exception of vents on some units. They take up excessive space, look bad, cause lots of space/tangling problems. If my PS3 had of come with an external supply I wouldn't have bought it. It's a real pain in the rear for consumers to find replacement supplies, especially when the device gets older. Also, since the company can charge you for an out-of-warranty replacement there is incentive to make the external supplies cheap so they don't last long, thus allowing the company to make charge more money to replace it.

Internal supplies often have much better protection and filtering, and don't suffer from 12V cords going bad or being broken (120V cables are much more robust).

Having said that, if this new PS3 has an internal supply and generates less heat, and is $100 cheaper then I think it will sell very well. I wonder if they have changed the ports at all?
by Jawknee1 August 18, 2009 11:47 AM PDT
eeh, not the one is saw. how many models of the Slim PS2 are there?
by dpeters11 August 18, 2009 12:25 PM PDT
Monkeyfun14: You've seen the 360 power brick I'm assuming. The thing is a beast, I can see why someone wouldn't have to deal with something similar to that monstrosity.
by El_Segfaulto August 18, 2009 12:40 PM PDT
I own a PS2 slim and it does indeed have a brick, a small brick, but a brick nonetheless.
by PiiSPii August 19, 2009 9:28 AM PDT
It does not have a power brick, everything is internal.
by whclevelandjr August 19, 2009 10:00 AM PDT
@Mergatroid

While it's true that most manufacturers go find the cheapest OEM external supply available, this does not necessarily mean external supplies are generally bad.

The reason internal supplies have forced air cooling is due to most chassis manufacturers not taking heat generated by the power supply as a consideration or the fact that cooling fins on a chassis are considered ugly to some people.

As for being filtered, I have external supplies that provide clean power and have significant filtering capability. Of course, I selected these supplies for sensitive measuring equipment but my point is that these external supplies do exist. Also not all internal supplies produce a nice clean voltage supply (you'd be surprised how little actually do), this is because they are switching supplies and most OEM varieties have just enough filtering to satisfy spec.

As for thermal breakdown, I haven't had an external supply fail but in my younger days I used to work for a commodore authorized service center. You wouldn't believe the number of external supplies we would replace. Evidently, the customers were real particular about their C64 but would just hide the power supply behind a desk and more often on the carpet floor. You have to take cooling in consideration when finding a place for your external power supply.

External power supplies have their benefits. They allow for a smaller chassis. They don't introduce any extra heat to the device which allow for fanless or quiet fan operation. Also since switching supplies do generate electrical noise that radiate along other paths beside power, external power supplies allow for lower electrical noise inside the chassis.

I still power my laptop with the original external supply. I had no issues with it so far (knock on wood), and I've carried it around with me and disconnected and reconnected it to the laptop countless times during the past three years.
See more comment replies
by Absolution2009 August 18, 2009 11:07 AM PDT
FINALLY! I wanted to buy another one for my room all for myself!!! (my original 60GB version is on the 70inch TV in the bonus room and everyone always uses it 8( ).

Now, what will Sony, Microsoft, Nintendo announce at TGS? I can't wait for that one. I think GT was being held for TGS
Reply to this comment
by Sryche22 August 18, 2009 11:20 AM PDT
yeah...I plan on purchasing 2 slims...one for the bedroom and one for our computer room (living room already will a the old model)...very exciting news!
by Embren August 18, 2009 11:08 AM PDT
Sold....
Reply to this comment
by Nebetsu August 18, 2009 11:08 AM PDT
Looks really ugly. I would rather have the slightly larger prettier one than the slightly smaller ugly one.
Reply to this comment
by Byteme2009 August 18, 2009 11:13 AM PDT
I would think that they are going to have to do something to move their inventory of 80gb units so I would hazard to guess you will see some sweet deals or bundles coming up on that one.
by man_is_man August 18, 2009 12:55 PM PDT
agreed, I hate to sound more feminine than I already am, but by the looks of this thing, I can't imagine it lasting another six years
by SahijApple93 August 18, 2009 4:12 PM PDT
I TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOU IT IS FRWAKIN UGLY FOR THE SAME PRICE I WOULD GET THE BIGGER THERE IS NO OTHER DIFERENCE REALLY
by KHartz November 17, 2009 5:00 AM PST
I have a old ps3 and a 360 that had the ring of death in a month these systems dont even compare to the quality of the slim, ps3 slim is way cooler, effecient, quiet as and BD player or DVD player and I have haven't had a heat problems playing the newest titles. My old consoles sound like a hurricane in the room... O yeah when ya use ur ps3 do ya look at the monitor/tv or the console???? nuff said
by smokin_Z28 August 18, 2009 11:11 AM PDT
is it backward compatible with ps1/ps2 games???
Reply to this comment
by Absolution2009 August 18, 2009 11:14 AM PDT
No, but they were patenting the technology on the cell processors so maybe they will release a software update to give it just that.
by Byteme2009 August 18, 2009 11:17 AM PDT
I didn't see anything to say that it is PS2 BC, but I doubt it is. Like many others though I think that is something we may see coming as an update, particularly if the new slim doesn't boost their sales significantly over the first quarter or two of its release.
by Jawknee1 August 18, 2009 11:17 AM PDT
all PS3's are PS1 backwards compatible but not all PS3s are PS2 backwards compatible.
by Haseo515 August 18, 2009 4:52 PM PDT
I sincerely doubt Sony will make PS2 backwards compatibility until the ps2 console life ends. They are focusing on marketing PS3 and PS2 at the same time so why would they destroy/diminish one of their cash cows?
by KHartz November 17, 2009 4:54 AM PST
nope psone and 2 games can be downloaded as well as psp titles
by monkeyfun14 August 18, 2009 11:13 AM PDT
Eh if im not mistaken the PS2 slims are space heaters. I've had one that would burn my hands if I touched it. More powerful hardware same small case where does the heat go?
Reply to this comment
by Glassner_S August 18, 2009 11:28 AM PDT
Calm down, take some deep breaths. Your Xbot FUD is coming as a desperation panic. Take a moment to collect your thoughts and come up with something better.
by monkeyfun14 August 18, 2009 11:32 AM PDT
@Glassner_S

No FUD here i've never even owned an xbox.
by Mergatroid Mania August 18, 2009 11:50 AM PDT
Ahem, so you're so sure people won't believe you that you figure if you put the message here twice it will convince them? ;)
by monkeyfun14 August 18, 2009 11:58 AM PDT
@Mergatroid Mania

Was a accidental double post.
by KHartz November 17, 2009 4:51 AM PST
Just bought a PS3 slim works great, runs cooler and quiter than the old ps3 and the 360 for sure and has never had a glitch... It is dead silent.....
by SactoGuy018 August 18, 2009 11:14 AM PDT
It appears that Sony is using new chipsets to reduce the size of the game console itself. And the new 120 GB hard drive is probably the same 1.8" 120 GB hard drive used on the current iPod classic.
Reply to this comment
by stoobush August 18, 2009 11:31 AM PDT
Not likely. Sony used easily-upgradable 2.5" SATA drives on the original PS3. No reason to change that for the Slim.
by SactoGuy018 August 18, 2009 12:50 PM PDT
stoobush, the reason why I mentioned the 1.8" drive is because it would consume a lot less power than a 2.5" drive. As such, Sony could get by with a smaller power supply for the whole console itself.
by RockaTech August 18, 2009 11:15 AM PDT
That sure is SLIM!!!!
Reply to this comment
by bob13254 August 18, 2009 11:15 AM PDT
yessssssssss!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by dizzygill August 18, 2009 11:18 AM PDT
Dang. I just bought an 80GB model in February. Anyone want a sweet deal on a barely used 80 GB "fat" model?
Reply to this comment
by RockaTech August 18, 2009 12:37 PM PDT
lol you should just keep it unless you could sell it for $299, i don't think it would be worth the upgrade for current PS3 owners but the slim does look very tempting.
by jayhawk73 August 18, 2009 11:19 AM PDT
backwards compatible to PS2 games?
Reply to this comment
by matthewp131 August 18, 2009 11:20 AM PDT
no, not at the moment
by Chiatzu August 20, 2009 2:45 AM PDT
HIGHLY unlikely since the PS3 you can buy now isn't PS2 compatible. The original PS3 was PS2 compatible, but to reduce heat and other problems they dropped the PS2 compatibility. Anyway, if you can buy a PS3 for $300 and a PS2 for $100 (recent price drop) it's still a good deal, IMO. More of a hassle to use two consoles over one, true. I happen to have one of the older PS3 models that is PS2 compatible. Yeah, I love it.
by KHartz November 17, 2009 4:52 AM PST
no but you can download them and psp titles
by Sryche22 August 18, 2009 11:22 AM PDT
I can't remember...when the PS2 slim came out, did people call the original model the "fatty" like we're seeing with the old PS3 model?...haha
Reply to this comment
by zoddy13 August 18, 2009 11:26 AM PDT
Nice,slim is finally here,too bad i already have the "fat" model but honestly i prefer mine i just love the way Playstation 3 is written on it.makes it look futuristic....
Reply to this comment
by CarbonCSX August 18, 2009 11:26 AM PDT
WOW, 33% LIGHTER!!! Must get
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan August 18, 2009 11:51 AM PDT
Ironically, I think game systems... or any set top unit, should be *heavier* even to the point of adding steel weights or something to help keep it planted on the table surface. I hate it when systems get small enough that the tension/kinks in the cables push the console around instead of the other way around.
by heygeo August 18, 2009 1:14 PM PDT
LOL why?! i dont carry around my console like a laptop...
by Geek_man August 19, 2009 10:28 AM PDT
Im guessing hes being sarcastic
Showing 1 of 10 pages (392 Comments)

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

The 411 on early-termination fees

Verizon Wireless has doubled its early-termination fees for smartphones, but what does it mean for the rest of the industry?

Google has its own plan for Netbooks

No, the search giant isn't saying it will build a Netbook. But it sure knows what it would like one running Chrome OS to resemble, and that's a little different from the Netbook of today.
• Screenshot tour of Chrome OS