Slowing down the Netbook train
Cheaper or faster?
That's going to be the burning question for computer shoppers perusing the aisles of electronics retail stores this fall. That's when the new line of notebooks powered by consumer ultra-low voltage (CULV) chips will start appearing in force. They'll be sitting right next to the trendiest offering in portable computing, Netbooks. Netbooks have come to be viewed as the best way to get cheap, portable computing, but CULV notebooks could change that.
CULV-based notebooks are poised to give Netbooks a run for their money.
(Credit: Macles)Netbooks are mini-notebooks with screens between 9 and 11 inches, that have lower-power processors, and fewer features, but very attractive price points. CULV-based notebooks are ultrathin notebooks. They come with a more traditional 12- or 13-inch screen, but are also very low-power, so they have great battery life. Starting at $600 to $1,000, they'll occupy the price range just a step above Netbooks, which run between $200 and $500.
That's where the choice comes in. Will consumers go for a Netbook, which is less expensive, sometimes harder to use, but very portable? Or a sleek-looking notebook with great battery life and a slightly higher price? Just a bit more money could mean a far more fully featured computer. Who would still go for a Netbook?
Some analysts suggest many won't.
For its part, the provider of these ultra-low voltage chips, Intel, would prefer to steer people toward CULVs. Sure, Intel is also responsible for the Netbook phenomenon, but those devices carry much lower profit margins. Intel CEO Paul Otellini on Tuesday talked up CULV notebooks and their advantages over Netbooks, saying, "Now, if you want a thin and light notebook, you don't have to just pick a Netbook. You can pick an affordable notebook that has more functionality."
Several studies regarding Netbooks have been published, but it remains unclear if people are choosing them because they're a cheap impulse buy and a placeholder in these trying economic times, or because they just want a gadget that fits in their purse. Few people appear to buy Netbooks because they love the small screen, small keyboard, and limited functionality. A recent NPD survey found that many Netbook buyers were indeed disappointed by what they got for their money, with 60 percent expecting the same functionality as a notebook.
So when devices that are almost as inexpensive, but function like a traditional notebook appear, what will that do to Netbook sales? PC makers will, like Intel, stand to make gains by selling slightly more expensive, and therefore more profitable, models of notebooks. But it's not without cost to the pro-Netbook campaign most major PC makers have undertaken in the last couple years. CULVs will by definition cut into the Netbook category by some margin.
Take for example, Acer's situation. It's done remarkably well selling Netbooks. Its Aspire One series has propelled it to the top ranks of portable PC vendors, and they're fairly well-reviewed. But Acer also has a new line of CULVs coming: the Timeline series. As CNET editor Scott Stein noted recently, the 11.6-inch Timeline CULV, which is roughly the same size as a Netbook, has a lot more going for it: "It has (an ultra-low voltage) processor that's faster than Atom Netbooks by a fair margin. Then there's the HD video decoding. Also, the 1810T can support up to 4GB of RAM. Other bonuses include HDMI, b/g/n Wi-Fi, and the ability to upgrade to Windows 7."
How can Netbooks compete with that other than price? It's going to be difficult. Netbooks have seen great growth, and are expected to rise to 33 million units shipped by the end of 2009, according to market research firm DisplaySearch. And most PC market analysts expect that to continue, but it will likely be tempered when CULVs take hold. "We're expecting that to level off and there will be some new competition from CULV systems this fall," said Loren Loverde, director of IDC's PC Tracker program.
To survive now, PC makers know that they have to be able to offer a variety of models for a wide swath of customers. The CULV will be positioned right between Netbooks on the low end, and traditional notebooks on the high end. But the loser is likely to be Netbooks, according to Loverde.
Electronics retail analyst Stephen Baker of NPD says that trying to match buyers with the right kind of computer has always been challenging. The best way to help consumers understand the difference between computer models is to arrange them at retail by price, since screen size and features are no longer the best way to determine the category a computer falls under--sometimes 12-inch laptops are far more expensive than 17-inch ones, for example.
And with consumers facing so many choices today, it adds even more pressure on PC makers, Baker added.
"It will continue to be a challenge. But the consequences are greater now because growth in the market depends on segmentation more than it ever has before. But it's not a new problem."
Erica Ogg is a CNET News reporter who covers Apple, HP, Dell, and other PC makers, as well as the consumer electronics industry. She's also one of the hosts of CNET News' Daily Podcast. In her non-work life, she's a history geek, a loyal Dodgers fan, and a mac-and-cheese connoisseur. E-mail Erica. 
However, having the inexpensive ultraportable, means a smaller screen.
In other words, it isn't about the next invention or advance in technology, in this case, you either have a smaller screen or you have a larger one.
I want the smaller screen, because a smaller device is what I want. Sure when looking the screen, at that moment it would be nice to have a larger display, but when toting the device around, a notebook, often just stays at the house, but a netbook....will get carried around.
I don't really buy the whole argument about netbooks not providing enough "functionality". By most measures today's netbooks are more powerful than my first iMac (a DV model) which was my primary desktop computer for a couple of years. Yes, time does march on. . . But the kinds of things most people do with their computers haven't changed *that* drastically in the last 10 years. (Remember, the "i" in iMac originally stood for the internet, just like the "net" in netbook.)
People who are looking for a very basic, very portable, and VERY affordable computer will still be in the market for netbooks. If/when notebooks and netbooks occupy the SAME low price range, then we will have a better idea of who's looking for the extra portability vs. who is looking to buy the most computer they can for the price.
They have evolved into larger, heavier, more expensive laptops for adults; some of the name brand versions are actually more expensive than bigger, heavier and more powerful traditional notebooks.
If the ultra-light conventional laptops want that niche they can have it; netbooks will most likely revert to what they were supposed to be, minimalist very low-cost small computers.
All that has happened is that the market realized that thin and light notebooks were horribly over-priced and were willing to put up with the limitations of a netbook rather than overpay. With the threat of their juicy market vanishing, the vendors are coming up with cheaper thin-n-lights, is all.
Market forces at work here, people; nothing special.
The only losers are Sony, Lenovo, and the other vendors selling $2000 thin-and-lights who'll have to either justify their prices or match the new sub-$1000 prices for the category.
Netbook users will win by a renewed focus on what netbooks are supposed to be about; cheap, *basic* computing.
The key point in the article was "Intel, would prefer to steer people toward CULVs" and "Intel is also responsible for the Netbook phenomenon, but those devices carry much lower profit margins". It is all about the money to them. Reality is Intel could produce a very robust "netbook" with all the features and benefits of a larger chassis system.
For all intents and purposes.
Is the CULV notebook faster or slower at handling the same tasks?
One of the reasons I have not gotten a Netbook is the lack of a DVD-DL-/+RW included. A missing optical drive is what sets most Netbooks different from the cheaper Notebooks. The Acer Timeline CULV notebook has a slot-loading optical drive, and a very small form factor.
What I don't know is how fast the 1.3GHz Intel processor is when using LotusNotes, firefox, AutoCAD, Costworks, Excel, Word, and working on a shared network, & etc.
I bought an Acer Aspire One, and I accepted the limitations because the price was right. I did not need more power, and I would not pay the same old price these re-wrapped laptops are being sold at.
With a low-end system, which surfs the web, typing notes, none of which requiring either high-power nor Windows, you open the door for a Google OS. Chrome might not counter Windows on desktops. But surely for netbooks, which you can't do much high-end work with anyway, a well known brand like Google might do better than some think.
And once people break that barrier to using another OS, and people start developing for Chrome, then you see prospects of change.
your article says CULV based notebooks start at $600 to $1000, compared to netbooks which run between $200 and $500. that's 2x to 3x the price! not what i would call "slightly higher price".
At the same time I think there will be new categories/sub-categories of mobile devices that emerge which will be attractive to those seeking true mobility. I, for example, have minimal interest in a netbook that is nothing more than a notebook put in a dryer for too long. But I would jump at a tablet form-factor device with a 7" (ok, anything between 5 and 9) screen and a real touch-oriented user interface.
The author is forgetting that in most emerging countries $400 bucks is the monthly wage. $600 means a month and a half. This kind of thinking has ostracized the U.S. in most of its policies, and Intel and Microsoft are no strangers to this argument. Netbooks are an excellent entry point for most people and the Atom is an excellent implementation of the x86 chipset. Combined with the NVIDIA Ion, they should give a run for their money to CULV, cause remember, the Core 2 Duo wasn't meant for low-power, so less power could really mean less performance, or worst yet, a performance barrier based on the TDP, and its implications during 100% cpu usage.
Dell currently offers 13, 14, 15, & 17" Inspiron laptops for less than $500 (http://www.dell.com/home/laptops). Unless you really need to have the extra long battery life why would anyone spend more money for a CULV which will in all likelihood will perform slower than the current Intel Dual Core chips?
If portability and battery life are the two main factors in the consumers decision making then CULV may have a chance.
If the manufacturers are trying to attract people to spend more money by offering better hardware at slightly higher prices than netbooks that's great, as that's what competition is supposed to do. Remember the days when you HAD to spend over a thousand dollars if you wanted a portable computer?
And as for features, the latest netbooks have lots of features. They run everyday software just fine, especially if you can work with Linux, as this operating system makes them snappy. If the CULV is to succeed, it must take buyers from higher in the market, ie from full-featured notebook buyers, so profits will reduce, not increase. Just see!
The netbook is that form factor - the size of a standard business book you'd carry on a plane or train. Why the focus on thin but a big screen with the CULV's? I don't have pockets to fit those things.
For portability, I run Ubuntu on a 1999 pentium-3 running at 500Mhz and use full Open Office and Firefox - most netbooks are running processors at three times that performance.
So I plan to upgrade to a netbook this fall with the coming price wars. There will be amazing deals between the ARM and Atom processor netbooks (many running linux - or can be re-installed with linux). I'm looking for the pricing to settle between $100 and $200. Yes - sub $200! Then what happens to that notebook market?... Especially when there is a VGA port out that can be hooked to your desktop wide-monitor or projector and USB ports for a bigger keyboard when desk-bound.
Fun times for those manufacturers that think creatively.
You can run EeeBuntu (Base) and Open Office on as little as a 4GB SSD...
I know the 160GB hard drives seem to be the standard now, but they seem superfluous for this genre, and SSDs are much more rugged.
- by July 17, 2009 9:56 PM PDT
- Like most mobile devices, the bottleneck on a laptop computer or Netbook is on the input side, specifically the keyboard. For many people like myself, Netbook keyboards are nearly impossible to use efficiently. Alas I have found there are two excellent portable keyboards one can buy to deal with this issue. Goldtouch makes a good fold-up keyboard (Go Travel), and Atek makes a good solid but portable keyboard (OnBoard Travel Keyboard). There are also rubber keyboards out there but they replace one problem with another since they are so wobbly.
- Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (43 Comments)