• On BNET: Make cool hacks for Google Maps
July 9, 2009 9:36 AM PDT

Sharp introduces new LED-backlit LCDs

by Michael Juliano
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 7 comments

The LC-52LE700UN is one of Sharp's new LED-backlit Aquos TVs.

(Credit: Sharp)

Sharp's first line of LED-based LCD displays is called the LC-LE700UN series, and it's available in four screen sizes. Here's a quick look:

Models (availability, suggested retail price)

Key features of the Sharp LC-LE700 series

The LE700 series, except for the 32-inch model, also features Aquos Net, Sharp's Internet-based service that features access to weather, stocks, and games, among others. The service, which was originally shown off at CES 2008, doesn't seem as full-featured as some other interactive TVs already available.

The company intends for the new Aquos LED series to be a wallet-friendly way to get LED-backlight technology. It looks like Sharp could live up to its low-price intention, as the LE700 series should be competitively priced against other LED-backlit models, like the Samsung UNB6000, the Toshiba SV670U, and the LG LH90 series.

The LE700 series features a "full array of LEDs" behind the screen, but doesn't have local dimming, a technology that allows different areas of the screen to brighten and dim separately. Past TVs we've reviewed with local dimming exhibited superb black levels, but we haven't tested any LED-equipped sets without local dimming aside from Samsung's edge-lit models, which didn't perform as well as the local dimming displays. Also, while Sharp is touting the LE700's native 120Hz refresh rate, a number of its LED competitors are already pushing 240Hz sets. Other than its energy-saving capabilities, it's not entirely clear how this kind of LED backlight offers much of an improvement over standard LCDs, so we'll have to look into it when we get our hands on the LE700 series.

The following products mentioned are available.

On Sale Now: $749.00 - $999.99
View the latest prices for Sharp LC 32LE700UN

On Sale Now: $1,089.00 - $1,499.99
View the latest prices for Sharp LC-40LE700UN

On Sale Now: $1,293.00 - $1,999.99
View the latest prices for Sharp LC-46LE700UN

On Sale Now: $1,599.95 - $2,499.99
View the latest prices for Sharp LC-52LE700UN

Recent posts from Crave
Killer deals on BlackBerry, Droid, and Palm Pixi
This week in Crave: The boxed-in edition
Ricky Gervais helps reveal pain of cell phone salesmen
Indecent Exposure 68: Inky extents
Apple fixes AirPort problems marring video playback on 27-inch iMacs
iPhone: The board gamer's paradise
Can erasing your iPhone's memory improve performance?
Top 5 best products of the fall
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by dhchiang July 9, 2009 10:24 AM PDT
Other than the energy savings benefit? That's one of the most important issues right now, and you didn't even mention how much energy it saves in comparison to typical LCD units. There is no mention of it's energy consumption at all. Considering that TVs are a luxury product that can use as much energy as a computer or 10 or more light bulbs, LED backlit LCDs can make an enormous impact on energy savings, which should not be glossed over.
Reply to this comment
by 12series July 9, 2009 11:40 AM PDT
Totally agree with the above comment, I look at all electronics now based on the three P's: Price, power, performance. A friend of mine bought a plasma tv he was very proud of, I was telling him how amazing it was that my sony lcd in powersave mode was drawing less than 100 watts, he tested his similar sized mondo expensive super plasma and it was drawing between 300-400 watts. He was pissed...
by mark7tenor July 9, 2009 1:10 PM PDT
There's no pesky mercury in these TVs, either. That fact, while overlooked, may be even more important than the amazing energy efficiency.
by ChukchansiDan July 9, 2009 11:37 AM PDT
Also, besides the four HDMI inputs, what else is it capable of using? What is the speaker configuration?
Reply to this comment
by gfritts451 July 10, 2009 9:51 AM PDT
Sorry, but I think the "power consumption" argument is a bit overblown...I'm not going to dump my 3 year old plasma for today's "green" model LCD to "save" $50 IF I used the TV for a8 hours a day, which I don't.

If you are a plasma owner being guilted into submission, just change out some of your light bulbs with CFLs....don't fall for the maufacturers and retailers who would have you buying a new TV every 2 years...

http://reviews.cnet.com/green-tech/tv-consumption-chart/?tag=contentBody;nextPage
by adub1083 July 9, 2009 2:34 PM PDT
It seems that LED back lit LCD s are lacking many important inputs such as simple composite and s video inputs. While HDMI may be the future, Companieslike Nintendo and Dish network still use this older tech. I like and also need the backward compatibility found on typical LCDs sold today. This is a turn off to me as it would make things like playing retro games and watching TV difficult from the start.
Reply to this comment
by paulwcs October 10, 2009 10:45 PM PDT
So, you'd buy a near-state-of-the-art LED backlit LCD tv for standard def tv shows and retro low-res games? That seems like a complete waste of money anyway. Your comment really makes no sense as it relates to a product with this picture quality.
Reply to this comment
(7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

A CNET Conversation with Eric Schmidt

CNET's Tom Krazit and Molly Wood sit down with Google CEO Eric Schmidt to discuss the future of Android, the Chrome OS, the problem of real-time search indexing, and more.

Verizon tests sending RIAA copyright notices

The No. 2 phone company, known for its reluctance to intervene in antipiracy cases, strikes an agreement to forward copyright notices on behalf of the music industry.