• On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
June 17, 2009 2:00 PM PDT

Battery-free LED flashlight recharges in 90 seconds

by David Carnoy

Light for Life uses ultracapacitor technology.

(Credit: 5.11 Tactical)

Last year, 5.11 Tactical, which makes clothes and gear aimed at law enforcement officers (but sells to civilians), announced a new high-tech flashlight called Light for Life. Only recently, however, has it become available to order.

What's special about it? Well, the flashlight uses three LEDs, but its key component is Flashpoint Power technology, an ultracapacitor energy storage system from Ivus Energy Innovations.

Light for Life recharges in just 90 seconds and shines at 90 lumens for 90 minutes per charge. The flashlight has three modes: bright (270 peak lumens), standard (90 lumens), and strobe, which is good for dance parties or scaring the neighbors' dog and kids (OK, I'm kidding, but you get the picture).

According to 5.11 Tactical, the 50,000-hour LEDs never have to be replaced and the flashlight is engineered to "offer 10 years of maintenance-free service under typical conditions." (You can recharge it up 50,000 times or one time a day for 135 years.)

I got a chance to play around with the thing at a recent event, and I have to say I was pretty impressed. It's lighter (16 ounces) than it looks, and it feels very durable. The one question I asked was: what happens when the power goes out and you have to recharge the thing? Answer: it comes with a 12V DC automotive charger, so you can use your car to charge it up in the event of a power outage.

The only drawback: Light for Life costs a whopping $169.99. But 5.11 Tactical says that when you add up the cost of all those D batteries over the lifetime of a battery-powered police flashlight, it's still a deal. And then there's all that good karma you get for not chucking those batteries into the garbage or landfill. It's hard to put a price on that.

Comments?

See one more photo after the break.

Light for Life in its charger.

(Credit: 5.11 Tactical)
Hunkered down in New York City, Executive Editor David Carnoy covers the gamut of gadgets and writes his Fully Equipped column, which carries the tag line "The electronics you lust for." He's also the author of "Knife Music," a novel. E-mail David. Follow David on Twitter.
Recent posts from Crave
WiiWaa: Fun for kids, coma for animal controller
Unboxing Modern Warfare 2's 'Prestige Edition,' complete with night vision goggles
SoundRacer adds V-8 sound, but not the power
Fridge Locker screams, 'Hands off!'
DIY podcasting with the PM Series Podcaster kit
The tech that never took off
Dead battery? Just refill it
T-Mobile to phase out MyFaves
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (40 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by bonesbautista June 17, 2009 2:16 PM PDT
A spendy tool, but it and your rationale for buying one do appeal to me and my senses.
Reply to this comment
by lalomartins June 17, 2009 2:30 PM PDT
Rechargeables are so last year :-) I bought a wind-up LED flashlight today. For HK$25. Can't get much greener than that.
Reply to this comment
by commenterer June 17, 2009 3:29 PM PDT
Your wind up is likely 40 lumens tops 270 lumens is incredible bright the strobe option on this will temporarily blind somebody your wind up also has a rechargeable battery inside how do you think it stays on after you wound it and if you wound it for 90 seconds while somebody else was charging their 5.11 the same time which flashlight owner would be the happier camper longer. dollar for dollar I would say your wind up is equally green just way less functional. police flashlights need to be this functional anyway so if they can be replaced with these it saves taxpayers money not just the environment.
by lalomartins June 17, 2009 8:26 PM PDT
Granted on the lumens.

It has an accumulator, which is greener than rechargeables.

And ?dollar for dollar?, bear in mind HK$25 = US$3.2.

Unless you're in a situation where you really need more light (like, as you say, a cop), I'm sure the person with the wind-up is a happier camper. Especially if we're literally talking about campers, who have no electricity outlet to charge their flashlights at will. You'd never even consider winding it 90 seconds, seriously; you press the thing once or twice and it's good for five minutes or more. The grip is designed so that the wind-up trigger is right in your hand ready to use, so if it starts to dim, just squeeze it and you're good for a little longer.

Also, my point is that it's way greener, because it doesn't use ?wall? electricity; you generate your own power, therefore, lower footprint.

So really, the only point you have is situations where you need more luminance. For these cases, I'd really rather design a larger wind-up than go with a rechargeable.
by Draq Wraith June 18, 2009 3:02 AM PDT
It uses an ultra cap which ios NOT A BATTERY POWER DEVICE. but a super capasitor that takes the place of the battery.

I want to take it apart and prove it is an ultra cap.

D~W
by Rod Roddy June 18, 2009 8:19 AM PDT
Yeah, I'm not too impressed with wind-up technology :-( Having a flashlight that is as dependable as this claims(135 years)makes up for the steep price. I'll get one when this recession passes.
by Joe Real June 18, 2009 10:14 AM PDT
Pretty soon, it will be sold directly from China. Why not price this right so that it would not be profitable for China to copy it and sell it in the US? Unless the manufacturing has been outsourced in China, but I do hope none of the components came or were made in China. One sure way to test if it has components from China, test for melamine or lead content. At any rate, I won't be buying this one at that price, and many others here also won't be. If the price was right, I would have praises for it. But for now, I and the others are not the intended market.

A crank-up LED flashlight is still the best application for my needs and is less than one tenth the price. There is no need to recharge from an outlet or a car battery. Just burn up a few calories from the muscles and you're good to go.
by viper396 June 18, 2009 10:28 AM PDT
Don't be so quick to blow off wind-up flashlights. If you shop around some of the higher end wind-ups give out more then enough light. A rechargable flashlight may be fine, when you have a way to recharge it, but a 90 Minute charge isn't a whole lot. What do you do during a prolonged power outtage or you're miles away from civilization and have no way to recharge it?

Either way, this flashlight may be great if your a police officer or in a situation where you constantly need it but many people only need flashlights in emergencies. 135 year lifetime or not, $169 is a little too steep for the casual requirements of most people and for them this flashlight may never pay for itself.
by Mikeybabes June 21, 2009 8:55 PM PDT
You paid too much. I got mine near Fa Yuen Street (Kowloon side) in Hong Kong. 5 LED not a wind-up but a lever with spring you depress for only HK$15. Those who say not bright enough, I can tell you it's much brighter than most battery powered torches.
A torch is useless unless it is powered, and all batteries drain over time. So in a power cut or tripped fuse you have the choice of either fumbling in the dark for replacement batteries - if you have any left or wait for the power to come back on so you can charge your rechargeable torch, or if you have a handpowered torch you can replace the fuse in the fusebox or get out of the house safely, whatever is required.
I know what I would prefer and the environment doesn't come into play at all. Unless you know when the power is going to go out and can ensure that your torch is powered, then I would say you might find your torch might be as useful as a solar powered one.
by Joe Real June 17, 2009 2:46 PM PDT
Here's another greedy pricing from the corporate lawyers. The cost of production of this thing should not be more than $2. I know that shrewd marketing people would love to price this based on the unrealized savings in batteries for an assumed lifespan. To make it really green, price it reasonably. Because of its greedy pricing, it is a nice thing to forego. BTW, I already have a wind-up LED flashlight which I bought for $9.95 about four Christmas ago and it is still working nicely after several camping trips.

Nice try 5.11! Unless you can sell this for around $20, I'm not even mentioning the product for a waste of time, just like the atrociously-priced windmills.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan June 17, 2009 3:07 PM PDT
I think you really need to hold this unit in your hand to understand the reasoning behind it. I've been a volunteer with a police department and you use these lights also as batons at times. You want to be absolutely sure it will be ready when you are. The company has a long history of very high quality products because they simply don't do junk.

Think of this as the Apple of Flashlights.
by socalJack June 17, 2009 3:22 PM PDT
If people are willing to pay $169 then that's what it is worth, just like that beanie baby people paid $200 for. It's called a free market economy.
by commenterer June 17, 2009 3:39 PM PDT
This is cutting edge technology, that is a seriously bright light ,it would probably light up half a block around you and can be fully recharged in a minute and half. A comparable Led light with lithium rechargeable's would probably cost half the price but take 3 hours to recharge. This isn't shrewd pricing a competitive market like selling flashlights would not allow for it. Though I'm sure with economy of scale and innovation you'll be buying these for $20 within 10years.
by Rick Cavaretti June 18, 2009 7:23 AM PDT
A free market economy? LOL. This is a technical site for technically minded individuals, not a finance site for the bean counter set. No reason to spread 'their' failed religion here.
by Flashattack June 18, 2009 8:45 AM PDT
What has "GREED" got to do with anything??? are you suggesting that this company owes society something? they owe their shareholders a return on investment. if they can get this much money for their product who are you or anyone else to complain??? dont like it? dont buy it. if enough people agree with you then they will fail. This is how it works.
as to your notion that they could sell this for $10 you are simply uninformed. the LEDs alone cost the maker more than $8. the ultracapacitor costs more than that. and besides shouldnt they be rewarded for thier time and effort to create this prodcut in the first place?
i guess you want to save the planet as long as somone else pays the bills.
by Joe Real June 18, 2009 10:01 AM PDT
Greed is a necessary motivator in the for-profit companies. Greed helps drive innovation. The only problem with greed is when it becomes an obsession, that it only maximizes the profit that the company will make without any consideration to morality or equitable distribution to the society. Just like the oil and pharmaceutical industry. The venture capitalists live by greed and profit, that is why the government has interfered to make Green Tech profitable by changing some laws and pumping some money into it, otherwise no one would be motivated to be gentle to the environment or help clean it.
by June 18, 2009 11:05 AM PDT
Thanks for the "green = good, risk/reward = evil" pitch, Joe Real. If you think Gore and his ilk aren't out to make a killing by shoving enviro-chic down our throats, then you're sadly deluded. Why else would he be living in a great mansion while insisting that everyone else make do with less. Leading by example -- that's how an honest man can tell if your cause has any true merit.
by make_or_break June 18, 2009 5:44 PM PDT
Sure the Pentagon isn't in on this action?

This is from a company that sells to government agencies. NEWSFLASH: we taxpayers are ALREADY paying for these with each contract 5.11 Tactical gets.

There's nothing "free market" about that. Then again, if this company thought about going mass market retail with this light a cheaper price point would make more sense just due to the possible volume that it could create...and a better price for ALL concerned, even those of us who never get to use and still are paying for it. Of course, the idea of Wal*Mart's inventory buyers trying to beat them down on margin and price might scare any U.S. manufacturer away (assuming of course that this light is actually made here).
by ZBeeb June 17, 2009 3:20 PM PDT
I agree with you Dan... except for the weight... I always felt more comfortable having that big heavy tube of batteries to swing at someone. I'm not sure how well it would perform as a baton.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan June 17, 2009 9:42 PM PDT
I agree on the weight issue. The flashlight worked well as a non-threatening baton whose mass could really help in certain situations. A lightweight one has the advantage of being nice to use directing traffic though at night with a red cone on it.

Besides, my duty belt was heavy enough as it was- I wouldn't have minded a lighter one. For a real baton, there was always the Asp.
by HeavyJim June 17, 2009 4:23 PM PDT
These are like hybrid or electric cars, everyone goes on and on about how good or important they are, but very few actually step up and buy one.
Reply to this comment
by professionaladventurer June 17, 2009 5:51 PM PDT
I have tested gear for 5.11 and their stuff is always good. BTW "....typical conditions" for them means combat enviro's, police work, etc. IE; NOT LOOKING FOR KEYS under your desk..
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan June 17, 2009 9:43 PM PDT
And considering this isn't meant for the general public, the price tag is what agencies will be paying for it. For a heavy duty unit like this with charger that can be kept in your cruiser, that's not a bad deal at all.

We've already looked at these for another project in the group I'm in, but the price was too high for what we'd be using it for.
by Crius72 June 17, 2009 8:23 PM PDT
I like it!
Reply to this comment
by Ryan_R June 17, 2009 11:24 PM PDT
I might just stick to the flash-light on my phone, which is obviously rechargable.
Reply to this comment
by tpegan June 18, 2009 5:07 AM PDT
Ultra-capacitors tend to have a high self discharge rate. Meaning that you'd probably have to recharge this thing on a pretty regular basis even if you weren't using it. That could be a problem if you stuck this thing in a drawer for awhile and pulled it out during a power outage.
Reply to this comment
by heulenwolf June 18, 2009 7:30 AM PDT
Agree. Any info on self-discharge rate, David?
by dcarnoy June 18, 2009 9:14 AM PDT
No word on that. But the question is why would you keep it in a drawer and not in the charger?
by grimgraphix June 21, 2009 9:21 AM PDT
"Keep it in the charger" ? Does that mean this flash will be an energy vampire then? That kind of defeats the whole purpose of marketing it as a "green" product then, doesn't it?
by parks1510 June 18, 2009 5:36 AM PDT
It's a good idea, but it won't be long before there are infomercials for a similar product selling for $19.95. Only an idiot would spend $169.95 for a flashlight!
Reply to this comment
by mobilePCpilot June 18, 2009 9:42 AM PDT
I'm not impressed. I use a Sunlite Turbo 220 lumen LED flashlight for five days straight for work and then just plug it in over the weekend.

Sunlite's website ( http://www.powerledlighting.com/Turbo.html ) says it lasts for 2.5hrs; but I probably quadruple that figure over the course of one week.

-Todd
Reply to this comment
by make_or_break June 18, 2009 5:49 PM PDT
I agree; Sunlite makes some excellent flashlights.
by SNOOP_ROCA June 18, 2009 12:47 PM PDT
Now only if my iphone could do that..... LOL
Reply to this comment
by Davey44 June 18, 2009 12:54 PM PDT
I gather 90 lumens is very bright. How many lumens does a typical consumer 3-D-cell flashlight produce for comparison? How come 3 leds can be so bright when the 9-led lights at Target barely glow? Different kind of leds?
Reply to this comment
by mobilePCpilot June 18, 2009 2:55 PM PDT
90 lumens isn't very bright at all. Think of it this way. If you look at a 200 lumen light it will "hurt". You can't look into it even if you wanted to.

It's not the voltage ie 3-cell, but the lamp technology (and wattage) and battery amperage that determines how much light is being produced. There is "professional" and "consumer" types of lights.

99.9% of people won't $100+ for a flashlight. But if you got your head stuck behind a plane's instrument panel trying to read a datatag with lettering 1/8" high; you'll be happy to spend $135 on a fashlight that works for you 100% of the time.
by masonx June 18, 2009 6:12 PM PDT
Looks like a $40 dollar product max - even with a 100% retail mark up. Being green is great, but even green has to be economically sensible. Over paying for a product by a factor of four does nothing for the environment. If you feel bad about all those batteries in the land fill, perhaps you should take that $120 difference and support a system of nationwide battery receiving centers to get them to recyclers. When was the last time you found a batter recycling collection center conveniently located to where people would use them?
Reply to this comment
by grimgraphix June 21, 2009 9:17 AM PDT
"Be Green" should be a way of life, but marketing people use it a a reason to treble the price of a product too often. $170.00 dollars is just impractical for the average torch user, even when one considers how many alkaline batteries you save on during the life of the product.

Aside from all of this... at this price, I would expect a hand crank charging cradle to be included with the product. Forcing an owner to use coal plant generated electricity or rely on a gasoline generator for a recharge defeats the whole idea of living off the grid and being green.
Reply to this comment
by mikeschroeder August 30, 2009 1:12 AM PDT
Green Sheem. Build another nuke plant and lets get on with life in the bright lane.
by justdenny June 22, 2009 12:05 AM PDT
Crave giveaway, maybe?... :)
Reply to this comment
by todd3617 June 22, 2009 7:58 AM PDT
All this green crap is way too expensive. The treehugging nuts want to make us all poor by forcing us to go green. We will be forced before long. All I've got to say is Cap & Trade.
Reply to this comment
(40 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

After 5 years, Firefox faces new challenges

Mozilla helped reshape the Web since releasing Firefox 1.0 five years ago. Now it's got a reawakened Microsoft and Google Chrome to reckon with.

There's a map for that: GPS or smartphone?

Almost every handset comes with mapping software these days, but standalone GPS devices are becoming more affordable than ever.