Viliv S5: Are UMPCs lost between Netbooks and smartphones?
Ultramobile PCs have always found themselves to be the tweeners of the mobile world: too large to be easily pocket-size, yet too small to be usable as full-fledged computers. While the landscape just a few years ago was marked with products ranging from Samsung's Q1 to the OQO, often costing way too much money, now cheaper smartphones and Netbooks have crowded in on either side with portable power to spare.
The Viliv S5, currently an import-only product, returns to the scene of the crime with a lower-cost Atom-based touch-screen device that runs full Windows XP, has Bluetooth and GPS compatibility, and even pulls up its own haptic-feedback on-screen keyboard. You'll need it, since the 4.8-inch screen's extremely fine resolution gets a little hard to manage. While a physical keyboard would have been nice (as would an SD card slot), the bulk of the S5's thickness goes towards a battery that boasts impressive life.
Read the rest of our review of the Viliv S5 UMPC.
And would you ever buy a handheld UMPC as opposed to a Netbook or an iPhone/Pre/Android phone? Sound off below.
On Sale Now: $1,034.02 - $1,182.31
View the latest prices for Samsung Q1 Ultra Premium
Scott Stein, a New York Jets fan and CNET senior associate editor, has written about tech, entertainment, video games, and viral culture for outlets including Laptop, Wired, Maxim, Esquire Online, Asylum, and Men's Journal. He also appears on the Digital City podcast. In his spare time, you might see him performing improv in New York City (when he's not being a dad). 

I have an iPod Touch, which is as close as I'll get to an iPhone while it's on AT&T's network. It's a nice little device and I carry it wherever I go, but it's not a substitute for a netbook or notebook when it comes to my particular needs... so I still have, need, and use my netbook.
My netbook is by no means pocket-sized, so I can't take it everywhere I'd like to. However, because it's a fairly inexpensive device, I'm more willing to take it places where it might be lost, stolen, or damaged than I would my $1,500 notebook. The netbook's no speed demon, but it does run the operating systems and applications I have wanted to run away from home. And I'm not limited to Apple's App Store and what they deem appropriate for me to have, unlike the iPod Touch.
But a UMPC isn't a good fit for me. It's too small to be a comfortable replacement for my netbook. It's too large to be a comfortable replacement for the iPod. I'm sure there must be some segment of people for whom it's "just right" but I'm not in that group. I'd much rather have a netbook with a physical keyboard, decent-sized screen, and more expansion options. And given the price listed for this particular device, my netbook and iPod still cost less in total.
The guitar pick stylus definitely has to go, as well. In the age of the iPhone, who wants to interact with a "smartphone-like" device like that.
And for those knocking the stylus; try it for a day. I got the accessory pack when I bought mine, which includes a case with standard PDA-like extendable stylus. I expected that would be what I use, but the guitar pick actually feels more comfortable in my hand for pointing and clicking.
Charlie
cbi132@verizon.net
- by dave_p_1 June 18, 2009 7:14 AM PDT
- I have an old OQO and am looking to upgrade. The Viliv would be tempting if it had 3G built in.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(6 Comments)UMPCs that can run Windows are indeed expensive but the advantages of a computer that you can take with you anywhere and use anywhere should not be underestimated. Windows gives it the capability to run corporate applications (unlike smartphones or lesser MIDs). Pocketability gives it the capability to be carried everywhere as a matter if course (unlike larger netbooks and notebooks). The form factor also gives it the capability to be used without finding a place to rest it on (also unlike netbooks or some of the clamshell UMPC designs).
That said, there are two problems with the Viliv design. First, the on screen keyboard limits the amount of typing you will want to do - a slider design with a hardware keyboard would make it much more useful for typing out comments such as this one. Second, I worry that the touch sensitivity of the screen will not lend itself to inking. The ability to take notes in meetings using Windows inking was an under advertised and hence underutilized capability of the OQO. Especially impressive was the capability of delivering a PowerPoint presentation and capturing the comments on the slides as they were displayed and then emailing them to the participants at the conclusion of the meeting.