• On MovieTome: See the villain of IRON MAN 2!
October 31, 2006 12:32 PM PST

The Razr revenge

by Kent German
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 8 comments
Share

Dear Motorola,

Congratulations on the phenomenal success of your Razr cell phone. It showed a true spirit of innovation and it sparked a cell phone design revolution that ushered in the thin handset craze. You certainly made the world sit up and notice your company once again. I just have one small request, however. Stop it already! After two years we're up to our ears in Razrs and we need something else. Please?

All right, I didn't write such a letter but I stand by my belief that Motorola has milked its record-breaking thin phone for far too long. But to my dismay today the company formally announced more Razr models. On the purely cosmetic front, T-Mobile is selling the Razr V3-Miami Ink (or V3t) collection. As we reported two weeks ago the handsets feature designer prints (or tattoos) on their front face. Both the magenta Razr V3 Cherry Blossom and the pearl gray Razr V3 Dragon are available for $89 with service. The feature set is unchanged from the T-Mobile's original magenta and pearl gray Razrs so a new coat is the only change you'll see.

Moto also confirmed what we told you last month that Sprint will be getting a new Razr of its very own. Up until a couple weeks ago when Sprint started offering a Razr V3m in red the carrier had spurned the Razr in favor of comepeting (and in our opinion better) slim models from Samsung. But after analysts said Sprint's Razr-phobia was bad business it seems the carrier finally has jumped on the Moto bandwagon with the Razr V3m in gray. The feature set looks unchanged from Verizon's V3m but Sprint says its EV-DO programming will set the phone apart.

(Photos: Motorola, CNET Networks)

Kent German is a senior editor for cell phone reviews at CNET. When he's not testing the newest handsets on the market, he's blogging about cell phone news for Crave. In his On Call column, he answers reader questions and gives his take on the rapidly changing mobile industry. E-mail Kent.
Recent posts from Crave
This week in Crave: The Cyber Saturday edition
The most beautiful cars in Los Angeles
FCC questions Verizon over ETF hike
Friday Poll: What's the next big thing in bionics?
An MP3 player for the vintage hi-fi set
Not all cats are bad photographers
iPhone orchestra: Roll over, Beethoven
Sharp's budget LCD puts features before picture quality
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (8 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
MOVE ON CNET!
by brxbmr76 November 1, 2006 8:26 AM PST
CNET needs to start exploring and promoting "features" on mobile devices NOT just design. I think DVB-H or Mobile TV could be cool in the US but who knows about it? What kind of camera features does the device have and what makes them cool? How good is the BT connectivity, pairing, syncing etc?

It doesn't get consumers or the technology anywhere when you rate a product over and over again with the same design or changed color. It also doesn't help when you give high ratings to a feature-less device and low ratings to a high featured device. The design is only 1/8 of the product, get into the mobile devices you rate and tell us how it works and doesn't.
Reply to this comment
MOVE ON CNET!
by brxbmr76 November 1, 2006 8:26 AM PST
CNET needs to start exploring and promoting "features" on mobile devices NOT just design. I think DVB-H or Mobile TV could be cool in the US but who knows about it? What kind of camera features does the device have and what makes them cool? How good is the BT connectivity, pairing, syncing etc?

It doesn't get consumers or the technology anywhere when you rate a product over and over again with the same design or changed color. It also doesn't help when you give high ratings to a feature-less device and low ratings to a high featured device. The design is only 1/8 of the product, get into the mobile devices you rate and tell us how it works and doesn't.
Reply to this comment
I agree with the above poster
by mongoos150 November 1, 2006 12:36 PM PST
I completely agree. Kent G, David K, Molly W, Tom M - can you guys please shift CNET's focus onto performance? Every "first look" video is nice for aesthetic purposes, but gives NO first look at performance besides "This product looks like a good competitor" or some variant. Video display reviews rarely mention response times or gamma outputs, audio reviews rarely review in-depth pitch levels, cell phone reviews rarely go in-depth with OS performance, lag, glitches and bluetooth transfers... CNET has a pretty face but lacks substance.
Reply to this comment
I agree with the above poster
by mongoos150 November 1, 2006 12:36 PM PST
I completely agree. Kent G, David K, Molly W, Tom M - can you guys please shift CNET's focus onto performance? Every "first look" video is nice for aesthetic purposes, but gives NO first look at performance besides "This product looks like a good competitor" or some variant. Video display reviews rarely mention response times or gamma outputs, audio reviews rarely review in-depth pitch levels, cell phone reviews rarely go in-depth with OS performance, lag, glitches and bluetooth transfers... CNET has a pretty face but lacks substance.
Reply to this comment
Proofreading BEFORE you post a blog
by threat15 November 1, 2006 11:18 PM PST
I totally agree with you Kent, the RAZR is played out. But seriously, you need to spell check before you post. This article is definitely an eyesore to read.

"You certainly made the world sit and up notice your company once again."

All right, I didn't write such a letter but I stand by my belief that Motorola has milked its record-breaking thin phone for for too long"

"But to my dismay today the company formerly announced more Razr models"

"Both the mangenta Razr V3 Cherry Blossom and the pearl gray Razr V3 Dragon are avaiable for $89 with service"

etc.
Reply to this comment
Proofreading BEFORE you post a blog
by threat15 November 1, 2006 11:18 PM PST
I totally agree with you Kent, the RAZR is played out. But seriously, you need to spell check before you post. This article is definitely an eyesore to read.

"You certainly made the world sit and up notice your company once again."

All right, I didn't write such a letter but I stand by my belief that Motorola has milked its record-breaking thin phone for for too long"

"But to my dismay today the company formerly announced more Razr models"

"Both the mangenta Razr V3 Cherry Blossom and the pearl gray Razr V3 Dragon are avaiable for $89 with service"

etc.
Reply to this comment
Lets Get Our Facts Straight!
by DreaBabe06 December 6, 2006 8:42 AM PST
To be fed up with all the new RAZRs is understandable. However, the Miami Ink edition and the V3t are two completely different models; they are not the same phone. I have recently purchased the V3t and I am quite annoyed at the lack of reviews on this phone. I have not had any problems w/ it so far and it has great features. CNET please get past your RAZR boredom and review the V3t!
Reply to this comment
Lets Get Our Facts Straight!
by DreaBabe06 December 6, 2006 8:42 AM PST
To be fed up with all the new RAZRs is understandable. However, the Miami Ink edition and the V3t are two completely different models; they are not the same phone. I have recently purchased the V3t and I am quite annoyed at the lack of reviews on this phone. I have not had any problems w/ it so far and it has great features. CNET please get past your RAZR boredom and review the V3t!
Reply to this comment
(8 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

The yogurt makers of tech: Gadgets to avoid

Don't buy these one-trick ponies--unless you like gizmos that gather dust.

Google wants to unclog Net's DNS plumbing

The Net giant, ever eager for a faster Internet, debuts its Google Public DNS service. With it, Google could become even more central to the Net.