Hands On: 13-inch Apple MacBook Pro
Radically overhauled last year, Apple's MacBook line of laptops moved to aluminum construction, edge-to-edge glass over LED displays, and oversize multitouch-touch pads (with the exception of the lone $999 white plastic model). The latest round of updates is more of a refinement than another revolution, but it adds some much-sought-after features, while lowering prices on many configurations.
Most notable, the 13-inch aluminum unibody MacBook has been promoted to join the MacBook Pro family. It's a move that makes sense, as the differences between the two lines were becoming increasingly blurred. To complete the transformation, the 13-inch Pro regains its missing FireWire port, making it even more useful for creative professionals on the go.
New to the Pro line is something we never thought we'd see on a MacBook--an SD card slot. Standard on the 13- and 15-inch Pro laptops, this corrects one of our main MacBook annoyances. We're also pleased to see the backlit keyboard--previously found in only the more expensive 13-inch versions--filter down to even the $1,149 base model (which is a nice discount from the previous $1,299 entry price).
Some have strong feelings about the nonremovable battery--similar to those already found on the MacBook Air and 17-inch Pro. It's a legitimate concern, but we think the promise of better battery life (Apple claims up to a 40 percent improvement), and three times as many recharge cycles as older batteries is just as important.
There are still a few items on our 13-inch wish list--matte screens, mobile broadband options, Blu-ray--but Apple has done an admirable job in filling in some of the major missing pieces. By offering more features for less money, the 13-inch MacBook Pro remains one of the most universally useful laptops available.
The design and construction of the system remain largely the same as last year's model, with a solid block of aluminum carved down, rather than a thin outer shell that has had support struts added to it. It's both lighter and sturdier than the older plastic versions of the 13-inch MacBook.
The new Pro also retains the same oversize touch pad, where the entire surface depresses like a button--although a simple tapping (as on a PC laptop) will also work once you turn that option on in the settings menu. We've become accustomed to the two-, three-, and four-finger multitouch gestures, which let you hide all your apps by sweeping four fingers up on the pad, or bring up the application switcher by sweeping four fingers left or right. Once you get used to that, going back to a regular touch pad is difficult.
Apple says the new display offers a wider color gamut, and the screen certainly looks bright and colorful, but we wish the same matte-screen option offered on the 17-inch MacBook Pro was available across the line. The 13.3-inch wide-screen LCD display offers a 1,280x800 native resolution, which is standard for screens this size, but we'd love to see Apple try its hand at a 16:9 laptop display. While the LED screen means a thinner lid and some battery life benefits, the edge-to-edge glass covering the entire display panel grabs stray light rays with ease, making the glossy screen hard to see in some lighting conditions.
By bringing back the FireWire port (now FireWire 800) and adding an SD card slot, Apple has addressed most of our most pressing issues with the previous 13-inch model. Pro photographers will point out that they usually use CF cards, but the rest of us won't have to always remember to pack a USB card reader or cable to directly connect our cameras.
The 13-inch MacBook Pro is currently running our benchmark tests, but in anecdotal use, the Intel Core 2 Duo CPU performs as expected, and for most tasks, we've always been satisfied with the lower-end processors (currently 2.26GHz). A 3.08GHz version is available on the 15-inch MacBook Pros, but the 13-inch model tops out at 2.53GHz.
We found the same Nvidia GeForce 9400 graphics as last time--a GPU that redefined the meaning of integrated graphics. We're still testing this system, but the previous 13-inch MacBook gave us almost 60 frames per second in Quake IV (admittedly not the most hardware-intensive game) at 1,024x768 resolution. Only the 15- and 17-inch versions offer the second, discrete GeForce 9600 GPU.
The new battery in the 13-and 15-inch MacBook Pros is nonremovable, but Apple claims the system can last up to 7 hours while surfing the Web, and about half that for video playback. To assuage concerns about the sealed battery, the company says the new models are good for at least 1,000 full recharge cycles--which they estimate to be about five years of use. We'll update with battery life scores from our video file playback test after we run the battery down a couple of times.
Stay tuned for a full review of the 13-inch MacBook Pro, with full benchmark and battery life scores, plus hands-on video.
> Need more laptop news? Follow me at twitter.com/danackerman.
> Laptops and more every week on the Digital City.
On Sale Now: $1,149.00 - $1,199.00
View the latest prices for Apple MacBook Pro Summer 2009 (Core 2 Duo 2.26GHz, 2GB RAM, 160GB HDD, Nvidia GeForce 9400M, 13-inch)
On Sale Now: $14.95 - $1,499.00
View the latest prices for Apple MacBook Pro Summer 2009 (Core 2 Duo 2.53GHz, 4GB RAM, 250GB HDD, Nvidia GeForce 9400M, 13-inch)
New York native Dan Ackerman, a former radio DJ turned journalist, has written about technology and music for publications including Spin, Blender, The Hollywood Reporter, and USA Today. He hosts the weekly Digital City podcast and the New York edition of Editors' Office Hours. Dan's new album, Tales Out of Night School, is available now. E-mail Dan. 
So much for 9 months of evolution. And with OpenCL supported in Snow Leopard, the "macs arent for gaming" thing doesn't make a difference. OpenCL is an open standard which AMD supports strongly, so thats no excuse either.
jjkurczak: The author sad the glossy screen was highly reflective and he wished they offered a matte option. Does that not answer your question about how it's different? It sounds exactly like unibody MacBook (normal) to me.
PaulMpanga: If you were complaining about 7 hour flights where you can't replace the battery mid-flight, I'd be right with you. But if you're talking about whole battery lifespan, I don't see what you're griping about. They are offering a battery that reputedly will not need to be replaced for at least 5 years (let's say 3-5). All my "normal" Apple laptop batteries have become noticeably worse after 1 year, and useless after 3. After 3 years, I usually consider upgrading my laptop. And if I wasn't upgrading my laptop, I should point out that after 3 years, not only should your battery still have another 2 years of viability (allegedly), but it will be out of warranty, so if you're not upgrading your laptop within that two years, you can always order a replacement online and do it yourself. I have read it's really not that difficult to do.
My main complaints about the new macbook pro's are:
#1. the lack of an expresscard slot....which to me just seems infinitely more useful than an SD card slot. I mean, why would I want to be stuck with an SD slot, when I could buy something like this? http://tinyurl.com/m9lczg
#2. glossy screen only (on 13" and 15" models)
#3. lack of any conceivable way to operate the laptop without a power outlet for 10 hours straight
One of those things, I can overlook. And the only laptop that Apple now makes with only one of those problems is the 17", which I guess means my next laptop will be ginormous.
not to sound like a PC fanboy but yeah I do tend to agree. Maybe that cause I have a-lot more experience with Windows than OS8, 9 and 10.
If the charge is full, stop charging. You can run it down for two hours and just charge it back up there is no memory effect with these batteries.
When the hell will you be away from an outlet for seven hours anyways?
all in all, the update and price drop sounds very promising. Now that my Dell is 4+ years old, i may consider a 15" Macbook Pro as a replacement, so long as running Windows won't be difficult.
One more thing. Why can't Iphone's use bluetooth stereo headphones. My winmo device can do it and it sounds great!
First of all, you will never find ANY PC that will match build quality, power, looks and amount of features for 1/3 or even 1/2 the price of a Mac. The reason the battery life is 7 hours is because there are not mechanisms or anything that have to surround it like a non-built in battery. Also, the new iPhones supposedly support stereo bluetooth. You also can upgrade the ram and the hard drive by yourself without voiding your warranty. All you have to do is take a few screws off the back and you can get in. And lastly, you can upgrade the OS on a whim if you'd like. There is no reason why you can't.
Myles Taylor, you're very right. There can't be more than 5% of users who carry around another battery. If you really want more battery life, buy a external battery by someone like HyperMac and get twice as much life out of that than you ever will with another battery for your computer.
And if I'm in my car, I'd rather spend money on a power inverter for the cigarette outlet, an inverter is much cheaper (you don't need one of those huge expensive ones), and has much more use overall than any laptop battery ever will. You could charge your phone, laptop and power an Epson printer all at the same time.lol
Overall, very good update and I was pleasantly surprised on many counts. Nothing is perfect and I still have some gripes, but very good.
- by Nakarou June 10, 2009 4:01 PM PDT
- I want to get a mac book because I hate vista and pc's
- Reply to this comment
-
-
- by kenvid June 10, 2009 4:30 PM PDT
- Yes Macs are more expensive. No doubt about that--however they are undoubtedly better. I have used Macs since the beginning 1984. I now own more PCs than Macs because they are cheaper to buy. THEY ARE NOT CHEAPER TO OWN AND RUN HOWEVER. I constantly have problems with my PC's both software related and hardware. I still use a powerbook G4 from 2003 or 4 everyday. It is almost as fast and more reliable than my new HP 14.1 Special Edition Laptop. No viruses. Almost no crashes. No problems with this machine from day one. The HP was at least half the price, but you get what you pay for. The Apple design (even from 6 years ago) is better than most of the current PC's. To get a PC with as beautiful of a look, you must spend the same or more than the Mac. One area that my PC is better however is with Web Video stuff (and that is mostly because I have an older Mac. The new Macs run Windows better than a PC. If you want to use cars as an example: A Kia will cost you much less than a BMW and it will still get you to your destination at 55 MPH, however if you appreciate driving you will enjoy the ride in the BMW much much more.
-
-
(20 Comments)two big problems about the mac books is price and the overall system specs
160GBs for $1,100? doesn't seem worth it, unless the macs store a lot less stuff than the pc
sadly, I can get a 200GB laptop for almost the half the price of the macbook
If they can lower the cost to around $999 and give the macbook 100 more GBs, I would so buy it.
I promise you, if you buy a Mac you will be fully satisfied and you will understand why people become "fans" of Apple.