• On TV.com: Why Is Everyone in TV High School SO OLD
June 9, 2009 2:59 PM PDT

First look at the Panasonic DMP-B15, first portable Blu-ray player

by Matthew Moskovciak
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 17 comments
Panasonic's DMP-B15 packs Blu-ray into a portable package, but it carries a hefty $800 price tag.

Panasonic's DMP-B15 packs Blu-ray into a portable package, but it carries a hefty $800 price tag.

(Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET)

Blu-ray is slowly becoming mainstream, but if you've started accumulating a sizable Blu-ray collection you've probably already realized that it's hard to watch those discs anywhere other than your home theater. Panasonic's DMP-B15 ($800 list price) is the first portable Blu-ray player on the market and we've had our hands on the review sample long enough to give our initial thoughts.

Design

Yes, it's the first portable Blu-ray player, but our first reaction after taking it out of the box was "wow, it's big." The DMP-B15 feels sizable mostly because its built-in stand, which is actually required due to the DMP-B15's unusual design. While most portable DVD players sport a clamshell design--just open it up and start watching--the DMP-B15's screen is actually upside down when you first open the unit. To get the screen right-side-up, you twist it around and lay it flat, then prop the unit up on its stand. Sitting on its stand, the DMP-B15 looks like a digital photo frame and it definitely has a sleeker look than a standard portable DVD player, but we'd still prefer a slimmer unit with a clamshell design.

The DMP-B15's display is actually upside down when you first open it up.

The DMP-B15's display is actually upside down when you first open it up.

The DMP-BD15's built-in LCD display is surrounded a mirror-like blue bezel, with the speakers running along the bottom. The display itself is 8.9 inches (measured diagonally) and has a native resolution of 1,024x600; that's not enough for the full resolution of Blu-ray, but at this small size you probably can't see the difference anyway. We appreciated that the screen features a matte finish, unlike the glossy screens that have become common on laptops.

To control the DMP-B15, you can either use the controls on the top of the unit or the included remote. The top location of the controls allows the front the DMP-B15 to have a sleeker look, but you'll have to lean over the unit to see what you're doing. We were happy to see a variety of controls available, including a small joystick so you can navigate menus without the remote. One click "up" with the joystick brings up the pop-up menu and a click down makes it go away. The included remote is just a slight step up over the cheap credit-card-style remotes included on many inexpensive products. It's perfectly serviceable (although missing a mute button), but at this price we expected a little more.

Features

If the DMP-B15 was just a portable Blu-ray player, it would be nearly impossible to justify its $800 price tag. However, Panasonic has packed the DMP-B15 with almost as much functionality as its entry-level standalone Blu-ray player, the DMP-BD60, making it suitable to use in a home environment as well.

The main reason the DMP-B15 works as a standalone player is its HDMI output. Connect the DMP-B15 to an HDTV and it's capable of outputting a 1080p signal and high resolution audio, just like larger units. For older TVs, there's also an composite AV output to be used with the included breakout cable. An SD slot is included and you'll need to insert a card (not included) to use BD-Live features. Rounding out the connectivity is is a headphone jack and an Ethernet port. Just like the DMP-BD60, the DMP-B15 can access Panasonic's proprietary Internet content portal, VieraCast, which includes YouTube and Picasa, with Amazon Video On Demand coming soon.

Even with extensive standalone Blu-ray functionality, the DMP-B15's price is still a major issue. We did a quick browse of laptops available with Blu-ray drives and found the Sony VGN-NS290J available for $900. Sure, the laptop doesn't have an HDMI output, but it has a much larger screen (15.4 inches), higher native resolution (1,280x800), built-in Wi-Fi and can obviously do more than just play back Blu-ray movies. We haven't tested the VGN-NS290J, so we don't know how well it performs, but we wouldn't be surprised if many consumers thought it offered a lot more value than the DMP-B15.

Full review coming soon

We'll be doing more in-depth testing on the DMP-B15's performance and usability, and the full review will be up early next week.

The following product mentioned is available.

On Sale Now: $593.99 - $805.67
View the latest prices for Panasonic DMP-B15K

Covering home audio and video, Matthew Moskovciak helps CNET readers find the best sights and sounds for their home theaters. E-mail Matthew or follow him on Twitter @cnetmoskovciak.
Recent posts from Crave
Killer deals on BlackBerry, Droid, and Palm Pixi
This week in Crave: The boxed-in edition
Ricky Gervais helps reveal pain of cell phone salesmen
Indecent Exposure 68: Inky extents
Apple fixes AirPort problems marring video playback on 27-inch iMacs
iPhone: The board gamer's paradise
Can erasing your iPhone's memory improve performance?
Top 5 best products of the fall
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (17 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by spartanbob June 10, 2009 6:19 AM PDT
I have an 17 inch HP laptop with a blu ray player, and a HDMI output. I got it for $800 this past year at BB, why would I buy this thing?
Reply to this comment
by skwerlhater0 June 10, 2009 7:18 AM PDT
I agree, there's no reason to splurge on something that plays back movies and nothing else (why would you need 1080p on an 8.9" display anyway??). At least the HP can, you know, do something else!
by rnaoncfixd June 10, 2009 9:23 AM PDT
A 17" HP laptop for $800? I would question the resolution of that screen. In either case, It should be as good as or at least better than the Panasonic Portable. I agree that a laptop with BD access would be a better decision.
by zbangando June 10, 2009 8:17 PM PDT
Another very good example. This player certainly does not appeal to the everyday target shopper.
by mraardvark June 10, 2009 7:41 AM PDT
Even a DVD's resolution is more than you need at that size. The point is, if you bought lets say Dark Knight on Blu ray and want to watch on the plane ride home you don't have to buy a DVD copy. But at 800$ I agree that there are plenty of laptops that would be a better choice.
Reply to this comment
by Weeji June 10, 2009 8:17 AM PDT
"The point is, if you bought lets say Dark Knight on Blu ray and want to watch on the plane ride home you don't have to buy a DVD copy."

How many $5 - $15 "duplicate" DVDs not purchased does it take to make the $800 price worth it? Also, there are other outlets, such as renting, that make it even cheaper. Oh, and many high-profile Blu-rays are starting to come with a digital copy.
Reply to this comment
by felderga June 10, 2009 11:38 AM PDT
When the price drops to under $200 it will be worth it. Also why can't they add a ATSC tuner to these portables anyway. I really don't think it would add much to the price
by ThinkerT June 11, 2009 10:08 AM PDT
I don't think he was defending the $800, I think he was saying that whether Blu-Ray's resolution is wasted on a screen that small is irrelevant to the discussion. Besides, it's not just the cost of duplicate DVDs - it's the hassle of having to manage twice as many pieces of media. While I agree that $800 is probably prohibitive for most people right now, I'm sure most people would prefer the convenience of having a portable Blu-Ray player than the hassle of re-buying their media collection, finding space to put them, etc.
by steve5200 June 10, 2009 1:38 PM PDT
What a silly way to spend $800.
Reply to this comment
by wizardb June 10, 2009 4:00 PM PDT
Blu Ray what a wasted of time it's basically a dead issue why carry on about BR anything
Reply to this comment
by OracleDev June 10, 2009 4:09 PM PDT
Waste of money. Worth is not more than $199 specialy when you can get a loaded laptop for under $799.
Reply to this comment
by zbangando June 10, 2009 8:19 PM PDT
I would have to say about $300, the same as an iPod Touch 2G.
by freddy_ace June 10, 2009 6:51 PM PDT
What a waste of $800! Bluray on a tiny screen with tiny speakers. But price it the same as regular portables and it'll fly off the shelfs!
Reply to this comment
by zbangando June 10, 2009 8:19 PM PDT
To evade these shortcomings they included a HDMI out, possibly 1.3a.
by zbangando June 10, 2009 7:10 PM PDT
You could buy an excellent blue-ray player for this price. On reason to buy this is if you want to get hi def without all the clutter, even then this screen's resolution is hard to excuse.
Reply to this comment
by AnthonyNYC June 10, 2009 7:46 PM PDT
It looks bulky, why don't they design nice cheap slim movie players that can playback highly compressed mp4 files and divx movies off a usb stick or sd card slot, and video will still look great at that mall size, then you got a product people might want to carry around on airplanes and business trips. But business men have loptops anyway, so they can play divx movies now, this seems like an un needed device.
Reply to this comment
by EdgeOne June 10, 2009 8:00 PM PDT
Blu Ray "is slowly becoming mainstream"? Among Cnet readers, possibly, but the mainstream public? Not even close. The only thing keeping the format alive is the PS3 and videophiles. I crave technology, but this thing is truly a joke.
Reply to this comment
(17 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

A CNET Conversation with Eric Schmidt

CNET's Tom Krazit and Molly Wood sit down with Google CEO Eric Schmidt to discuss the future of Android, the Chrome OS, the problem of real-time search indexing, and more.

Verizon tests sending RIAA copyright notices

The No. 2 phone company, known for its reluctance to intervene in antipiracy cases, strikes an agreement to forward copyright notices on behalf of the music industry.