• On TV.com: New TV sex symbol: Vintage black PORSCHE
May 28, 2009 4:50 PM PDT

New HDMI standard brings Internet to TV

by Dong Ngo
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 12 comments

Awhile ago I said all HDMI cables are basically created equal, regardless of price. That's about to change.

HDMI Licensing, the body responsible for licensing the High-Definition Multimedia Interface specification (widely known as HDMI) announced Wednesday the features that will be incorporated in the upcoming HDMI 1.4 specification.

A regular HDMI cable.

(Credit: Dong Ngo/CNET)

Among other advancements, the latest HDMI specification will offer networking capabilities with Ethernet connectivity and will add an Audio Return Channel to enable upstream audio connections via the HDMI cable.

According to HDMI Licensing, the detailed HDMI specification 1.4 will be available for download on its Web site no later than June 30. For now, you can read more about the new version here.

Personally, I'm most interested in the networking capability, which is said to cap at 100Mbps; not as fast as Gigabit Ethernet but still plenty fast for virtually any IP application.

It's safe to say that in the very near future, you'll be able to conveniently surf the Internet, as well as check e-mail and instant messaging with your TV. It also means your entertainment corner will be less cluttered, as this spares you from the need for a separate Ethernet cable, currently a must if you have a setup that allows for Internet access from your TV.

There's a downside, however: the new standard will require a new HDMI cable. Existing HDMI cables, including the Monster Cables that you paid hundreds of dollars for, will not be compatible with the new standard as they are designed to deliver sound and graphics only.

Even if the existing cable could handle the new standard, in many cases you will still need to get a new cable as HDMI 1.4 also comes with a new connector called Micro HDMI, which is about 50 percent smaller than the current connector. This new connector will be used in portable devices and support resolution up to 1080p.

New devices that support HDMI 1.4 are expected to be available by the end of the year.

Dong Ngo is a CNET editor who covers networking and network storage, and writes about anything else he finds interesting. You can also listen to his podcast at insidecnetlabs.cnet.com. E-mail Dong.
Recent posts from Crave
Top 15 Black Friday tech deals
Charlie the robot joins rest home staff
Motorola's iDEN i410
Digital City Podcast 59: Black Friday shopping tips, and a PS3 MAG beta invite giveaway
'Good Time Ring' pays tribute to Polaroid
Top 5 tech turkeys
Technology that's totally impossible
Nintendo Black Friday: DSi with $20 in DSiware
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (12 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by MadLyb May 28, 2009 6:35 PM PDT
This is what happens when you create a standards body that only answers to itself and generates revenue from licensing fees.

Let's see, an RCA connector from 30 years ago still works today, a S-VHS connector from 15 years ago still works today, and so on and so forth. Early adopters of HDMI found out that new equipment would not work with their expensive (at that time) HDMI cables because it needed 1.3 for bandwidth and more importantly HDCP. So, how did DVI add support for HDCP and not require new cables? The changes were strictly in the end devices.

The answer is HDMI Licensing needs recurring revenue.

And beyond updating the freaking firmware, why would I want Internet in my TV? I mean convergence is great, but this is nuts.

And there is already a way to bring the Net to a TV without a second wire...it's called WiFi.

Sheesh!
Reply to this comment
by george_liquor May 28, 2009 7:54 PM PDT
What's the point?
by bcookin May 29, 2009 7:09 AM PDT
As I tried to figure out reasons for the networking capability addition, I kept ending up with, but why would you need that? A media server just needs video and audio to the TV or receiver. An all-in-one TV/PC would just need networking from a router or modem, no other sources to the TV need the ethernet. Unless someone has thought of some magical convergence device that I don't know of, it does sound like a money grab. Not only will device manufacturers feel pressure to include the latest version of the standard but they will also start running out of real estate to add the new connectors. Because of this, they might have to get rid of the HDMI 1.3 and ethernet they just added since it is combined functionality. Once again the consumers will be out of luck with obsolete equipment.
by BCF1968 May 29, 2009 6:43 PM PDT
why would you want internet on your TV? Oh let's see first many people watch TV via the internet so many it wold be nice to actually watch those shows on a TV and not some small computer monitor. Secondly as I said you save the cost of having both a TV and a monitor. Not to mention I can surf the net from my coach instead of being tied down to a desk.

As far as wi-fi? MUCH less secure. Considering my wireless G adapter which supposedly handles 56 mbps only gets me 15 Mbps and I have a 20 Mbps connection. So will a wireless N adapter even get the 100 Mbps this new HDMI will? I'm not sure why you even have an issue with this? No one is requiring you to buy a new cable.
by george_liquor May 28, 2009 8:00 PM PDT
Unless receivers start shipping with built-in routers & cable modems, you still need more than one cable to get an internet connection to the TV. Wifi is definitely the way to go.
Reply to this comment
by Ryan_R May 28, 2009 8:11 PM PDT
I can already do that stuff on my TV.

It's called 'Playstation 3'
Reply to this comment
by umbrae May 29, 2009 11:35 AM PDT
No you don't because you run your network over ethernet or wifi: not through the HDMI cable. In your sense, almost EVERY device does this as my DVR, DVD, HDDVD, XBOX, Tuner, etc all have network and audio/video ports.

However, this spec is useless since an ethernet would have to be somewhere. Routers don't have HDMI port and you will at least have some network cord running out of your WiFi or wired router. This is only a means for media devices to be aware of the network: most likely to look for illegal sharing.
by anhzero May 29, 2009 7:01 AM PDT
seriously, why use wire when there's wifi...
Reply to this comment
by wing2299 May 29, 2009 8:26 AM PDT
You spelled "HMDI" under the photo.
Reply to this comment
by ngodong May 29, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
Fixed. Thanks for the catch.
by forever4now May 29, 2009 8:52 AM PDT
I wonder what's happening with DisplayPort these days. I was under the impression that it was, more or less, an unlicensed (free) alternative to HDMI.
Reply to this comment
by umbrae May 29, 2009 11:24 AM PDT
You might see this as a convince, but this could also allow the RIAA and MPAA to sniff your network. I see rootkits or software loaded on devices from DVD's or other media that will now have network access to spy on you.
Reply to this comment
(12 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

E-tailers linked to 'scam' blame customers

Priceline, Classmates.com, and Orbitz say customers should read the fine print before complaining about being charged to join loyalty programs they didn't want.

The 411 on early-termination fees

Verizon Wireless has doubled its early-termination fees for smartphones, but what does it mean for the rest of the industry?