• On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
May 21, 2009 5:00 PM PDT

Panasonic SD cards hit Class 10. Should you care?

by Lori Grunin

If you own a camera or camcorder that uses SD cards, chances are you've confounded yourself at some point trying to figure out how fast a card you need (or want) for your device. This is complicated by a lot of factors, primarily that the Class specification defines a minimum sustained transfer rate--Class 6 is 6 megabytes per second, Class 10 is 10MBps, and so on.

(Credit: Panasonic)

That's like saying a car is rated for at least 10 miles per gallon; it helps you filter a few other cars out of your buying decision, but it's not very helpful for sorting through the myriad others with a similar lowest-common-denominator rating.

Nor is there any official body that verifies the performance. The SD Card Association provides some guidelines and testing tools, you pay your licensing fee for the Class logo, and you're in business.

For example, according to Rob Galbraith's tests for SD cards in the Nikon D90, the sustained JPEG write speed for Class 6 cards runs from about 3.6MBps (Fail!) to as fast as 18.5MBps. But by the Class metric, you can theoretically stick both in your HD camcorder and have no performance worries. And what if the manufacturer simply decides not to pony up for the Class logo? Lexar's unlogofied 133X Professional SD claims a sustained write speed of 20MBps. Virtual Class 20! Update 5/22/09: Lexar wishes you to know that the card does indeed have a Class 6 rating. Interestingly, the only card on which the company seems to put the official rating logo is the Full HD Video Memory Card, which is Class 4, and as far as I can tell, the only card for which it doesn't provide any additional performance specs.

So Panasonic U.K. announced the first Class 10 SD cards, the Gold series, with (obviously) a minimum transfer rate of 10 MBps and a stated maximum rate of 22MBps. Right next to me is a Class 6 8GB SanDisk Extreme III SDHC with a maximum rate of 30MBps that Galbraith's tests indicated had a JPEG sustained write speed of 18.4MBps in the Nikon D90, well beyond what's required of a Class 10 card. Which should you buy to put in that hypothetical Class 10 device?

My point is that if you're confused, it's completely justified. And a rep from the SD Card Association told me earlier this year that this lovely system will continue with SDXC.

All this makes it difficult to figure out which card to buy, especially when presented with large price disparities between seemingly similar cards. Unfortunately, there's no easy solution, because few companies offer complete specs on their cards (for simplicity's sake!).

It might help to understand where you will and won't see performance gains from a faster card, however. For instance, your camera won't take pictures any faster, since that's primarily an autofocus speed issue, and the time to save a single shot has more to do with controller overhead than media write speed.

Nor will you get a better burst frame rate in a digital camera (unless the manufacturer specifically states that it requires an xMBps card to achieve a given rate) or better video quality simply because a card is faster. What we have typically seen with digital cameras is the ability to shoot longer burst runs with faster-than-minimum cards. But even there, once you reach the equilibrium speed where the card writing never bottlenecks at the camera's fixed maximum frame rate, the extra bandwidth gets wasted.

Right now, the highest bit rate at which most consumer HD camcorders and cameras are encoding video is 24 megabits per second, and the highest resolution is 30 frames per second 1920x1080, for which they're requiring Class 6 cards (though I've seen some contradictory requirements for Class 6 in one place and 10MB/sec in another for a given product). So I'm guessing that until we see encoding bit rates increase, there shouldn't be a need for faster cards.

Speedy SD mostly comes in handy when it's time to transfer images and video to your computer (a task for which the Class spec is completely meaningless, by the way). And here, as Rob G.'s testing shows, a reader that supports UltraDMA makes a big difference.

Senior Editor Lori Grunin has been covering digital imaging for two decades, but her memory's kind of sketchy on the details. You can hear about it every week on Indecent Exposure, the podcast she co-hosts with Matt Fitzgerald.
Recent posts from Crave
Ricoh goes modular for GXR camera system
Moxi cuts price on its DVR, adds step-up model with a triple tuner
2010 Tesla Roadster Sport first drive
Sneak peek: Xobni e-mail app for BlackBerry
The DIY secret-knock door lock
New BlackBerry software will make your phone cooler
The 411: Storage limits and more on data plans
Can Bheestie Bag save your soaked device?
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Sam Papelbon May 21, 2009 5:24 PM PDT
this smells like another ploy by a tech company to invent a spec to brag about. (or at least invent the importance of the spec, as with megapixels). sure a few devices may require a minimum, but they aren't going to tell the consumer what they need or can get by with, they are going to tell them which one is the best. 'this one is a higher class number, that means it's better!' 'but do i need it?' 'well, unless you want to have last year's technology' 'i'll take 2!'
Reply to this comment
by chuchucuhi May 21, 2009 6:02 PM PDT
This has always been very confusing. I just purchased an HD camcorder where the max res video has a rate of up to 17mbps. I also purchased 16GB SanDisk Extreme III SDHC cards in hopes there aren't any problems and hopefully there won't be it just feels like you're rolling the dice sometimes no matter what brand you get not my favorite game.
Reply to this comment
by kcotham May 21, 2009 6:20 PM PDT
Try getting the camera manufacturers to give you the information on what the fastest speed their cameras will support. It's like trying to get a terrorist to tell you where the bomb is. And forget about finding it in the owner's manual. I'm speaking of point and shoot cameras. I don't know about dSLRs. Trying to get that information from Kodak and Olympus was infuriating. I never did get a clear answer.
Reply to this comment
by protagonistic May 21, 2009 7:39 PM PDT
Water boarding? :-)
by gerrrg May 21, 2009 10:55 PM PDT
That is an odd question to ask.

I know of no speed limits on cameras. For most people, they just get the fastest card they can afford to buy. The difference between a slow card and a fast card is the amount of time it takes for your camera to write back to your card, and there are no limitations on the camera's end on how fast a card can be.

I do know that most people get messed up on the differences between SD and SDHC cards, which are essentially the same form factor, but older consumer electronics do not support SDHC.
by jogiba May 23, 2009 7:27 AM PDT
I pre-ordered the new Pentax K-7 the other day and it has a data rate of 74mb/sec or twice that of the Canon 5D Mark II. It shoots 1024p Motion JPEG (AVI) 30fps vs 1080P Quicktime MOV H.264.
Reply to this comment
(6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

After 5 years, Firefox faces new challenges

Mozilla helped reshape the Web since releasing Firefox 1.0 five years ago. Now it's got a reawakened Microsoft and Google Chrome to reckon with.

There's a map for that: GPS or smartphone?

Almost every handset comes with mapping software these days, but standalone GPS devices are becoming more affordable than ever.