New iPhone could go on sale July 17
What's coming? We only can guess.
(Credit: Corinne Schulze/CNET)Forgive us for repeating rumors, but when you're writing about future Apple products like the next version of the iPhone, rumors are all you have until the thoroughly tight-lipped company officially spills the beans.
Today's rumor--well, actually it's yesterday's rumor--comes courtesy of AppleiPhoneApps.com. Through its very own Deep Throat--aka a source who is "closely connected to Apple's hardware development team"--the Web site posted some details on just what the third-generation iPhone will offer. What's more, it names Friday, July 17, as the release date.
We can't verify anything right now, but some of the predictions make more sense than others. A July 17 release date is very plausible. Both the iPhone Classic and the iPhone 3G went on sale on Fridays (June 29, 2007, and July 11, 2008, respectively). Apple likes to respect tradition.
Here's a list of what the new iPhone could offer, along with my comments. AppleiPhoneApps is also predicting that the $199 and $299 price tags will remain.
- A 32GB model--We've expected this for some time. What's more, it would be welcome.
- Double the RAM and processing power--Ditto here. Hopefully, Apple will add background processing as, as well.
- A 3.2-megapixel camera with video-recording capabilities--We've been hearing about this for a while, as well. But while Apple is at it, we'd also like more camera editing features.
- Ability to send a pictures and video via MMS--The iPhone 3.0 software update will add the ability to send photos with MMS so videos would make sense too.
- Turn-by-turn directions--We'll also get this with the 3.0 update. The feature won't be native, but it will come through apps.
- 1.5x the battery life--The short battery life is one of the iPhone 3G's biggest flaws. I'd look forward to this improvement the most.
- Apple logo on the rear side will light up--This one is random, indeed. Outside of the, "Look at me, I have an iPhone!" factor I can't imagine why you'd want this. Plus, I agree that it would be useless and annoying if it negatively affected battery life.
- Built-in compass--This is a bit odd, but anything is possible. You can get limited compass functionality through a compass app.
- Built-in FM transmitter--This would be a first for Apple, so I'm suspicious. But I'd like it.
- Other physical changes--AppleiPhoneApps says the metal border might go away and the new model could have a sleeker profile and a rubber tread on its backside. Personally, I think the iPhone is sleek enough already, but some CNET readers have said the opposite. The rubber tread would protect against falls, I suppose. The blog also mentioned an OLED display.
AppleiPhoneApps also promises a "revolutionary combination of the camera, GPS, compass, and Google maps" that will identify photos and photo locations. Now, while that sounds like just the sort of thing Apple would do, CNET News' Daniel Terdiman rightly pointed out when we chatted recently that it wouldn't be the first of its kind. Such an application is in development for the Android platform.
Monday, June 8, would be the earliest we'd learn the details on new iPhone models. That's when Apple Vice President Phil Schiller will open the company's Worldwide Developers Conference in San Francisco with a keynote address.
One analyst has suggested that an announcement could come later in the month following the return of CEO Steve Jobs, but most informed eyes are looking toward July as the magic month for both a new model and the formal release of the 3.0 update.
Of course, we'll relay the details as soon as we know them. In the meantime, tell us what you think the new iPhone will have and what you'd like it to have. I know...better call quality is probably top of mind with many of you.
Kent German is a senior editor for cell phone reviews at CNET. When he's not testing the newest handsets on the market, he's blogging about cell phone news for Crave. In his On Call column, he answers reader questions and gives his take on the rapidly changing mobile industry. E-mail Kent. 

that alone sums up how valid this rumor is !
Twice the processing power and RAM
iPhone is already using 620mhz arm 11 processor underclocked to 412mhz to save the already limited battery life of the iPhone. There isn't even a mobile phone chip on the market that achieves twice the processing power of the Arm 11 besides snapdragon which is 1ghz not twice the power of the current arm architecture which would need to be 1.2ghz
Twice the RAM which brings the iPhone to 256mb of DRAM completely overkill for any phone even the iPhone and would be a pointless addition to the iPhone as it wouldn't even be utilized especially on a phone that only processes one application at a time.
1.5 times the battery life I fail to see how this can be claimed with features that will use twice as much battery life.
256mb memory would be fantastic for the iphone/ipod touch. You can only have so many safari/large apps before the app will close. You can have many running at once by pressing the home button.
I see 3x+ battery life as apple listens to there customers. Plus them not allowing background process to save battery life, it could have been made worse.
16GB/32GB sounds kinda lackluster since samsung has released a 32GB nand chip, but its probably due to cost issues.
This is where the rumor is made a rumor. An FM transmitter for Apple is like the Card Reader, not going to happen.
Plus the back light..what phone has them...really.
There has also been the chromatic (like nano) rumor...plus the ipod touch/nano getting a camera.
Finally I can see the rubber back to be more finger friendly in the sense that it won't collect them.
Actually my processor info is correct I may of got the name wrong though.
Hmm, Bill Gates, is that you? And here I thought you were just your common variety Microsoft shill.
Since when is there such a thing as too much RAM?
I never said it was too much I was giving reasons for why the rumor is potentially false. Why cut your profit margins on RAM when the phone will never use anywhere near the amount your putting in?
Anyone will tell you that 256mb of ram is overkill for a phone especially one that will spend its life time using one app at a time and doing mediocre tasks such as making fart noises and using other basic apps.
If this rumor is true cool but i'm just saying why it may not be.
And what did any of comments have to do with Microsoft? If anyone is the shill it's you.
But to say the phone does not need more RAM is crazy Then again if you think...
"256mb of ram is overkill for a phone especially one that will spend its life time using one app at a time and doing mediocre tasks such as making fart noises"
You obviously don't know the iPhone very well, it a much more than something that makes fart sounds for most people. It's like saying PC's are over powered for a machine that just runs solitaire and a browser.
More ram would probably be the single best thing Apple could do to improve performance, so it's almost a certainty in my opinion.
thats the most ludicrous claim ever !
I fell out of my chair laughing ! Lol!
Reception is one of my biggest issues with the iphone. I had 9 dropped calls with my parents today. Ridiculous.
Of course everyone with an iPhone has the same service provider, providing the phone is not unlocked...duh.
Not sure how an iPhone will do this with the battery in the way. But I assume it's possible through some plastic ductwork similar.
Sharntel
NC
I've got a feeling some bloggers are just pulling iPhone fanboys cranks with a lot of these supposed features. The iPhone will probably end up with just a bit more memory and copy/paste. The media pundits will have a good laugh and so will RIM and Palm.
Still...it's not enough for me to want to get over my prejudices and go back over to ATT. iPhone needs to creep over to other carriers like T-Mo before I'd get one.
And anyone who bought an ipod touch and iphone can you please tell me the difference. How can apple take out the sim card of a phone and call it a music device. lol the ipod touch is not an mp3 player is an iphone with no sim card.
No sim card, no 3G transmitter or receiver, no antenna and no $70 per month AT&T subscription. But yes, otherwise they are completely identical.
BTW, iPod touch also lacks GPS and camera. Apparently Bluetooth is there, but in a very sneaky way, just to let people use Nike+
Yeah, right. it's the exact same, only different.
No sim card, no 3G transmitter or receiver, no antenna and no $70 per month AT&T subscription. But yes, otherwise they are completely identical.
So why do people pay to throw away this features from their iphone. you pay money to add features and not the otherway round.
Might be the most painful 3 months I have endured in a long time. Unlike the Palm Treo and Motorola Q I had previous to the iPhone I used the iPhone a lot. My coverage was at least as good as VZW and the call quality was fine. Throw in the iPod functionality, the exchange email and the apps and it is abosolutely, hands down the best mobile device on the planet. If you are too cheap to pay the monthly fee stop whining and go cry all over your inferior phone.
"I'd like to see those people who don't own an iPhone to stop pretending their crappy phones are better?"
Seriously, everyone's different. Maybe they just DON'T like touch screens. What a concept.
- by May 21, 2009 6:04 PM PDT
- hmmmm dont know if any of this is gonna make iphone a much better phone... still lacks the power of Palm Pre...
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by rex-tc May 21, 2009 6:43 PM PDT
- Tell me one spec Pre would have over iPhone 2009?
- Like this
-
- by darkpoet25 May 21, 2009 9:00 PM PDT
- We will see once the Pre is actually released and is reviewed. So far no one has any actual proof yet that the Pre is as great as many hope it is. I think it is BS that they wouldn't let anyone in the press have any hands on time with it.
- Like this
-
- by ithomas94 June 10, 2009 3:06 PM PDT
- LOL Rex-TC: You're including rumors about updates to the iPhone 2009 that are quite simply, going to stay rumors.
- Like this
-
Showing 1 of 3 pages (76 Comments)Lets do a comparison?.
Iphone 2009 - Pre
1) 32GB vs 8GB
2) Video Recording/Editing vs No video
3) OLED (color,viewing angles, battery life) vs LCD
4) Longer battery life vs Shorter battery life
5) FM Transmitter vs No FM transmitter
6) 3.2MP vs 3MP
7) Larger Screen OLED vs Smaller Screen LCD
* )GPS/Compas/Turn-by-turn vs GPS
9) 256 RAM vs 256 RAM
10) Fast Objective C games vs Java Based Games
11) Webkit Browser vs Webkit Browser
12) 3G vs 3G
13) 600Mhz ARM vs 600Mhz ARM
14) MMS with video vs No Video MMS
15) WIFI with Adhoc Gaminig (OS3.0) vs WIFI
16) Audio Sharing (OS3.0) vs NO Audio Sharing
17) 35,000 Apps vs Handful Apps
18) Itunes Store (Music, Podcasts) vs No Itunes
19) Bluetooth 2.1 vs Bluetooth 2.1
20) Multi Touch vs Multi Touch
21) Non Physical vs Physical Keyboard (Wears Out)
22) AT&T Network vs Sprint Network
23) $199(16GB)/$299(32GB) vs $299(8GB - $100 Rebate)
24) Thousands Accessories (car, docks, cases) vs Hardly none
FM Transmitter? Yeah, like Apple's gonna let people save money . ..
The OLED screen isn't confirmed yet. iTunes is a laggy piece of ****, the overall bad quality of the program simply cancels out all the benefits of the expansive community.
and a correction to your keyboard comparison:
Non Physical (Inaccurate, not for some people) vs Physical Keyboard (Wears out, but much more accurate and most ppl prefer this)
and you forgot background apps . .. -_-