T-Mobile proposes settlement for early termination fees
Class action suits against carrier early termination fees (ETFs) are nothing new, but now it appears one case may come to an end.
Though it has yet to be approved by the court, T-Mobile has proposed a settlement in an $11.5 million class action suit filed in August 2008 in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The suit alleges that T-Mobile broke federal and state laws when charging the ETFs.
The settlement would cover T-Mobile subscribers who were charged a flat-rate ETF from July 23, 1999 to February 19, 2009, or those whose service contract included an ETF during the same time period. The settlement would resolve several other pending cases that challenge T-Mobile's flat-rate ETFs.
T-Mobile customers who file a claim form will be eligible for one of three awards, according to the terms of the settlement. Customers who paid an ETF can receive up to $125. Customers who were charged an ETF but did not pay and did not receive a full credit within 30 days, can receive up to $25.
"Non-cash" relief will be provided for customers who had an ETF in their contract. Such relief could include 50 bonus minutes a month for three months, 100 bonus text messages a month for three months, "T-Mobile HotSpot" access for three days, or the right to have your contract with T-Mobile contain a prorated ETF. T-Mobile began prorating ETFs in June 2008.
Kent German is a senior editor for cell phone reviews at CNET. When he's not testing the newest handsets on the market, he's blogging about cell phone news for Crave. In his On Call column, he answers reader questions and gives his take on the rapidly changing mobile industry. E-mail Kent. 

People should be forced to pay for stupidity, I don't see the point to both the legislation and the lawsuit. It will just make all other subscribers pay more. Makes you wonder what happened to survival of the fit.
T-Mobile has the customer service of a company owned by what used to be a monopoly. I seriously doubt that all the people charged early termination fees are people who violated whatever contract they had with T-Mobile.
All your cases should have been settled in the first 30 days before the contract is set. If you had canceled in those 30 days it would not have been a problem. Though with all your drama I have a feeling this is more a case of user error then anything else.
@bknowledge
Since they screwed up, you did not end up paying an early termination fee. They might have made it harder then they should have, but in the end you did not pay so you do not qualify for the suit. The people involved are cases where it was not T-Mobile's mistake, but instead their inability to hold their end of a signed contract.
also, QualityFrog said explicitly that they cancelled in those 30 days. nice try, though.
That was exactly what i was thinking. "up to $125" is not worth much when you compare it to the negative stain that unpaid balance left on their CreditScores.
Meh. At least it's a step in the right direction. next i'd like to see the mandatory 2 year contracts go by wayside of extinct! Highway robbery that those contracts are...
- by Suebeeee November 4, 2009 1:59 PM PST
- I run a company that was sold a whole truckload of BS from the salesperson..."We'll send people out to train your employees" (They had no one to do this), our phones can port to be a modem for your laptops (again bs). We started requesting help within days of receipt of the phones and five months later, after going for three weeks without the phones taking messages, bringing in emails or texts, we had enough. We called, called and called to try and resolve the whole early termination process BEFORE we terminated. We had no choice. My small company changed over to AT&T. T-Mobile continued to charge us fees!!!
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(11 Comments)Maybe a new class action suit is in order.