May 4, 2009 6:24 PM PDT

DDRdrive releases superfast, superexpensive SSD

by Dong Ngo
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 10 comments

You've heard that solid-state drives, such as the Intel X-25M, are significantly faster than traditional hard drives. However, they are still nowhere near as fast as the DDRdrive X1 introduced on Monday.

The DDRdrive X1

(Credit: DDRdrive)

This is the first storage device I've seen that comes in the form of an expansion card. At a glance, it looks very much like a video card or a modem and it is compatible with any PCIe expansion slot.

Unlike other SSDs that use a flash memory called NAND, the X1 uses two types of memory: NAND and DRAM. The latter is commonly used as system memory. DRAM (or RAM in generally) is very fast; however, information stored in RAM is volatile and is destroyed when the computer is powered off. This is where the NAND part of the X1 comes into play by retaining the information when the computer is not in operation.

The drive has the same amount of DRAM as it has of NAND, which is only 4GB. This combination is designed for optimum input/output operations per second and, according to DDRdrive, the X1 indeed offers superfast performance and can be backed up or restored in its entirety in less than a minute.

The fact that you can get thumbdrives with 8GB or more might seem to lessen the appeal of the 4GB X1. The drive, however, is made for special applications such as databases or those that require performance above all else.

Somebody must really need the performance to be willing to buy the X1. With a price of almost $1,500, it has by far the highest dollar-per-gigabyte figure I've seen: more than $370. In the case of the Intel X-25M or most other SSDs currently on the market, you'll pay only about $4 per gigabyte of storage.

To DDRdrive's credit, the X1 does come with a five-year warranty and is compatible with all 32-bit and 64-bit Windows versions.

Dong Ngo is a CNET editor who covers networking and network storage, and writes about anything else he finds interesting. You can also listen to his podcast at insidecnetlabs.cnet.com. E-mail Dong.
Recent posts from Crave
Robots in 2009: The wackier, the better
Time Warner Cable shows subscribers how to cut cord
Times Square New Year's Eve Ball, a timeline
Want to see Google's new phone on YouTube?
Photographers bless improved Canon autofocus
Gadgettes Podcast 168: The Web obviously-not-exclusive-at-all-anymore Episode
Report: Apple event to be held January 26
Job ad suggests Xbox Live headed for WinMo phones
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by kswa1987 May 4, 2009 7:37 PM PDT
please edit your articles for grammar before publishing, i almost didn't want to finish reading it because it bugged me so much
Reply to this comment
by ngodong May 4, 2009 9:36 PM PDT
Hey sorry and thanks, it was just a draft and not supposed to go live yet...
by kswa1987 May 4, 2009 10:29 PM PDT
my bad... i should have mentioned also that i liked this article in spite of it
Reply to this comment
by goowiz May 4, 2009 11:25 PM PDT
err... Fusion-IO has been coming out with these for a while now...
Reply to this comment
by anthrothechnologist May 4, 2009 11:28 PM PDT
There are other storage devices on the market that use expansion slots, the most notable I can think of is the Fusion-io ioDrive (review here: http://tinyurl.com/c4zrt2). While these solutions differ in implementation, both offer insanely fast I/O speeds, but these are only really practical in enterprise application servers as noted. Another disadvantage is that as of the current motherboard BIOS's on consumer boards, you can't boot off drives using PCI-E slots.

On a side note the idea of using RAM for storage is not new, although this does seem to be well implemented version. I always thought the best way to enjoy the speed benefits of RAM as a hard drive were in lite Linux distributions, like Puppy Linux, where even on slower systems opening programs is nearly instantaneous. Unfortunately these distributions are often too spartan for an everyday working environment.
Reply to this comment
by richto May 5, 2009 1:47 AM PDT
My OCZ Vertex SSD drives already include both DRAM and NAND and outperform the stated maximum read and write speeds for this device. Not to mention it costs a fraction as much and goes up to 250GB in size. (The 120GB option is the fastest.)
Reply to this comment
by xZero2007x May 5, 2009 1:20 PM PDT
Um, it appears you're a bit confused on how your product works. OCZ's Vertex line does NOT use the same concept described here. It's just a normal SSD drive--to rub it in, it's a mere MLC drive with a mediocre controller. Intel's X25M (M = MLC) drive already eats the OCZ Vertex for breakfast, and the DDRDrive listed above theoretically can provide performance beyond Intel's SSD drives (including the SLC drives).
If anything, you're probably referring to the generous amount of cache given on the Vertex. If you ask me, I think it's your fanboyism or need for instant gratification that made you sound like an idiot with your erroneous comment that hardly contributed anything at all.

Oh, if you're so happy about your device's performance, fill it up to about 90+% capacity, and then try running your benchmarks again :)
by GladLock May 5, 2009 6:14 AM PDT
Uhh....How about some performance stats such as read/write speeds?
Reply to this comment
by xZero2007x May 5, 2009 1:23 PM PDT
This seems to be a good implementation of the technology. Should be interesting to see whether or not they can be cost-effective on the production line and work on the R&D a bit more to work this into a wider, more practical market.
Of course, before that happens we're going to have to improve our SSD technology, starting with following Intel's example with the MLC drives and making SLC drives more cost effective.
Reply to this comment
by DDRdriveLLC May 11, 2009 10:41 AM PDT
Clarifications from the CTO of DDRdrive LLC:

The DDRdrive X1 was singularly designed to target IOPS intensive applications while setting a new standard in performance, power, and price.

In other words, a product exclusively targeted for the enterprise market, i.e. not the consumer market.

What's the difference? Simply IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second).

The DDRdrive X1 is the highest performing (300,000+ IOPS), most power efficient (30,000+IOPS/W and lowest price (0.005 $/IOPS) internal storage device in existence.

For a significant class of applications (database tables, indices, and transaction logs) that are capacity constrained, we are an extremely potent and unique solution.

The drive for speed,

Christopher George
Founder/CTO
DDRdrive LLC
www.ddrdrive.com
Reply to this comment
(10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.