• On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
March 31, 2009 5:13 AM PDT

Sony PS2 finally hits the $100 price point

by John P. Falcone
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 71 comments
Sony PlayStation 2 (slim) (Credit: Sony)

No April Foolery here: Sony has announced that it's dropping the price of the PlayStation 2 from $129 to $100 as of April 1. The move confirms rumors that had surfaced in recent days.

Originally introduced in 2000, the current iteration of the PS2 is a superslim console that also doubles as a CD and DVD player. It has a library of around 1,900 games, including many classics that can be found in bargain bins at local stores and online. And unlike the PS3, the older model actually has an infrared port, so you can use a standard universal remote to control movie playback.

So what do you think: any interest in picking up a newly encheapened PS2? Or are you holding out hope that Sony will eventually drop the price of the PlayStation 3?

The following product mentioned is available.

On Sale Now: $64.99 - $99.99
View the latest prices for Sony PlayStation 2 (slim form factor)

John P. Falcone covers home theater and network entertainment products. He's been writing for CNET since 2002.
Recent posts from Crave
Hands-on with Ilford's Gold Silk inkjet paper
Fancy a free phone?
Inside CNET Labs Podcast 71: 'Very' good at counting!
Digital City Podcast 60: Attack of Cyber Monday!
How the Grinch iPhone game stole my $1.99
Project with the powerful LG Expo
Dell brings Chrome OS to its Netbook
Get 'Mass Effect' (PC) for $4.95
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 3 pages (71 Comments)
by tipoo_ March 31, 2009 5:46 AM PDT
Huh, so no PS3 price drop. I guess i will take the 80 gig for 250 from that guy then.
Reply to this comment
by blusky08 March 31, 2009 7:36 PM PDT
OMG/WOO-HOO!
When Sony said they had a big announcement, who knew it would be this frickin' big?!
by UCVirus March 31, 2009 5:56 AM PDT
Nope. The fact that Sony feels cutting the price of something that was popular 5-7 years ago by a whopping $20 bucks is BIG news just shows how out of touch Sony truly is.

If they'd dropped the price to $299, I'd have run out and bought one this afternoon. Oh well. Guess it might be time to drop 220 on an Xbox + Hard Drive.
Reply to this comment
by tmt345 March 31, 2009 1:15 PM PDT
Learn to count please its a $30 price cut, not a $20 one. Sony is not out of touch, actually, they have been listening to us gamers on how to improve the PS3 much more than Microsoft or Nintendo is with their console owners. At the start the PS3 was a pile of crap, online sucked, no games, overpriced. Alot has changed since then, now they have more quality exclusives than the 360 or Wii, and an actual 2009 lineup. PSN needs one or two more features before its better than Live, I think by the next update it will be considered better, right now its on par with Live, and its free. The PS3 is the best deal too, bluray, wifi, bluetooth, no RROD or E74 or disk scratching, no crapware (looking at you Wii). This pricecut is just in time IMO, the PS2 sales have been pretty low for the past half year, and now its dirt cheap and more widely available to poor countries, and to casual gamers who don't want to spend lots of money for a console.
by BCF1968 March 31, 2009 2:41 PM PDT
Yes and if you bought a $299 PS3 Sony would have LOST $150 because of you. Considering they make at most $12 per game unless you are also willing to buy 12 PS3 games along with that console I suggest you learn about how things work in grown-up land.

let's have fun with math. let's say that Sony would normally sell 4 milion PS3 this year. Now let's say with a $100 price cut they would sell 6 million.

At the current loss of $50 per sonsole Sony loses $200 million on those 4 million PS3 sold.

With a $100 price cut Sony would lose $150 on 6 million PS3 for a total of $900 million in losses.

Now how is losing an extra $700 million "smart"?

With the curent price Sony needs people to buy 4-5 games to break even. That can happen. With a $100 price cut that number goes up to 12-15 games. No one is buying 12-15 games in a year.

If the PS2 price cut can spurs sales of PS2 and games and can add more income to the games division and with the costs of making aPS3 droping all the time, I'm sure by late fall Sony can then afford a price cut. More people buy consoles in Nov and Dec than the rest of the year combined anyways.
by ctyree March 31, 2009 6:00 AM PDT
Does anyone really care that they are dropping the price of the PS2?
Reply to this comment
by bobbyphoenix March 31, 2009 11:11 AM PDT
I do. I have an older full size PS2 that I play regularly, and it's laser eye seems to have run its time. Seems to be taking a lot longer to load some games, so when I'm not playing PS3, I don't like waiting for games to load on PS2, so I was waiting for the price drop to pick up a new streamline PS2.
by DanMarrero March 31, 2009 12:43 PM PDT
I surely don't care. If this is what sony means by "big" then they need to re-evaluate what the meaning of "big" is............................(thats what she said)
by mcolt12 March 31, 2009 6:05 AM PDT
Sony or Xbox, Sony or Xbox....... The only thing Sony has is the Blu-Ray, I think I will stick with Xbox.
Reply to this comment
by heulenwolf March 31, 2009 6:10 AM PDT
Sony called a press conference for this? Haven't they heard the story of the little boy who cried wolf?
Reply to this comment
by planblove March 31, 2009 6:55 AM PDT
I really don't think there's anybody out there that was waiting for this news. At this point everybody who wanted a PS2 most likely has one already.
Reply to this comment
by josh606 March 31, 2009 7:06 AM PDT
I had a PS2 a few years back liked it, got about 20 games for it and sold it because it got boring. Why is Sony still making PS2s? Are they still making a profit from the PS2s?
Reply to this comment
by Firehazel March 31, 2009 1:54 PM PDT
they are. it's the world's best selling gaming console ever. well home console anyway.
by groyal March 31, 2009 7:30 AM PDT
They are making a huge profit from the 250K they sell each month. All the sunk costs are long since paid back.
Reply to this comment
by HD_MD March 31, 2009 7:32 AM PDT
Holding out. I'm buying if it's down $100. if not, no PS3 for me.
Reply to this comment
by 86lg4b4c March 31, 2009 7:32 AM PDT
wow,sony you are a leader.
Reply to this comment
by pintos-n-cheese March 31, 2009 7:33 AM PDT
This thing is 9 years old! It's just now $100 new? Why not buy used?

This is not big news. This is...weird. I don't get it. A $29 price drop. What's the point?

And aren't they still losing money on the PS3?
Reply to this comment
by BCF1968 March 31, 2009 2:45 PM PDT
Yes they are losing money on the PS3 so I'm not sure why people think losing even MORE money on each console sold makes finanical sense.
by grilledcharlie March 31, 2009 4:18 PM PDT
It's Sony's fault that people aren't buying a PS3 at $400. The average consumer just doesn't see the value in it, when right next to it in the store sits a $250 wii or a $200-$300 XBOX 360. I can see the value in a PS3 at $400, and that's why I bought one. I do believe that Sony either needs to drop the price or start a more aggressive marketing campaign to get people to see the value.
by thelemurking March 31, 2009 7:36 AM PDT
I still have an original PS2, why would I want to buy another one? They should be more concerned with the PS3. Nearly every kid in America should have a PS2 by now. Don't they realize that it's the PS3 that needs the sales boost? Dropping a PS2 to $100 isn't going to be any help towards their Wii damage control.

PS3 needs a price drop if they want to start selling that thing in this economy.
Reply to this comment
by HMetal68 March 31, 2009 7:40 AM PDT
This is the big announcement from Sony that the net has been buzzing about for the past several days? I'm actually suprised this is even news worthy. Who cares? So what? Even if they dropped the price of the PS2 to $20 (about what they're worth now) I wouldn't buy one.
Reply to this comment
by iSony March 31, 2009 7:47 AM PDT
Not a bad move; but obviously selling more units doesn't translate into added revenue, so it isn't that significant business-wise.

$400 is a pretty good price for what you can do with a PS3. A price drop accompanied by a massive marketing campaign would be a win for Sony. A PS3 price cut is imminent. Who knows, an announcement may come during the E3, if not sooner.
Reply to this comment
by Core_M March 31, 2009 8:04 AM PDT
Are they insane? People have been screaming that they want cheaper PS3s since launch, and what has Sony done? Removed the PS2 components and dropped prices a bit. Then they put models out with more "features" at the same price points. Now, way overdue for finally getting the first real PS3 price cut and 9 years in the life-cycle of the console they supposedly replaced, they dropped PS2 prices.

What? Do they make this stuff up on the fly? "What do you think the most out of touch thing we can do today is, Bob?"

I don't know, maybe they finally just gave up on selling PS3s and decided they should just stick to selling 9 year old designs. If anybody can give me any form of insight on why you'd do this, please do. I've pretty much given up on Sony doing anything intelligent. I guess I'm just lucky I stopped playing games when I was about 10 years old... It seems to cost a fortune nowadays.
Reply to this comment
by iSony March 31, 2009 9:12 AM PDT
I'm sure people would like to buy a PS3 for 10 bucks, or free for that matter.
by BCF1968 March 31, 2009 2:48 PM PDT
are they insane? No. No see insane would be taking a console that you currently lose $50 on each one sold and dropping the price so you now lose $150 on each one sold.
by blusky08 March 31, 2009 7:12 PM PDT
Well, they certainly got lots of free publicity for the PS2. They probably have a few too many boatloads of them unload.
by clsmithj March 31, 2009 8:10 AM PDT
wow after 9 years Sony just now lowered the PS2 to $100.

I remember back in the 16-bit days, that it took only 3-5 years before the SNES and Genesis were $100-130

and 5-6 years before NES was $90-110.

This long delay for a PS2 price cut clearly shows that Sony was aiming to profit the best they could on their old system before letting it die like the rest.
Reply to this comment
by epross March 31, 2009 8:29 AM PDT
I saw a PS2 at a friend's house on a 50" LCD. The quality of the graphics just sucked, it was all blocky and pixelated. His PS3 looks way better on the same TV. Why would anyone want to buy a new PS2 if they didn't already own one? Maybe owners of non-HDTVs, or the bargain-bin lovers looking for cheap games. $100 for a 9 year old console is too much, maybe $75 is more reasonable IMHO.
Reply to this comment
by iSony March 31, 2009 9:13 AM PDT
Why do you think $75 is more reasonable? Do you have any data on how does it cost to make a PS2?
by epross March 31, 2009 12:33 PM PDT
I have no idea what it costs to make a PS2 - it's irrelevant anyway, I just said IMHO that $75 would be more reasonable, meaning, I would *possibly* buy one at that price given my perceived usefulness of the PS2 to me. If Sony can manufacture one at that price that's great, if not, they just won't go there. I just don't see a $30 price cut as being that significant give the age, and remaining life of the platform (after all they aren't going to keep making PS2 titles forever)
by Stormspace March 31, 2009 8:45 AM PDT
Investing in a PS2 at this point is crazy. They are just clearing the shelves before they drop it all together. Sony did the same with the PS1.
Reply to this comment
by LOGANslade March 31, 2009 9:00 AM PDT
PS2 will come to an end pretty quick no matter if they make the price $10. No one really wants one anymore. The real news should be PS3 SALES DROP! Im just sayin.
Reply to this comment
by rucknrun March 31, 2009 9:47 AM PDT
PS3 is a good deal at 400. You have to pay for everything with the xbox, online play, wireless adaptor, xbox hard drive and no bluray.
Reply to this comment
by grilledcharlie March 31, 2009 11:22 AM PDT
No matter how great a deal $400 for a PS3 is, they still cost more to walk out the door with one. You don't have to buy all that stuff with an XBOX. I don't use wifi for my XBOX or PS3. After playing games on the Playstation Network and spending time on the ridiculously uselss Home, I gladly pay what amounts to $3 and some change per month to use the excellent XBOX Live.
by iSony March 31, 2009 12:21 PM PDT
I actually paid $700 for my PS3 (60GB, BC, 2 controllers, 3 games) and it's one of my best purchases of all time.

@grilledcharlie

You are clueless when it comes to PSN.
by kalel33 March 31, 2009 12:47 PM PDT
@ iSOny

Isnt' what grilledcharlie said the same thing that every publication says about the PSN compared to XBL? You say he doesn't have a clue, but he's in the same mindset as almost everyone else who've tried both.
Showing 1 of 3 pages (71 Comments)
advertisement
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

S.F. hacker space: Heaven for the DIY set?

The Noisebridge hacker space offers sewing and Mandarin classes, soldering workshops, Internet-controlled front door access, and a server room with no door.
• Photos: Circuits, code, community

The browser battles go on and on

roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.