March 3, 2009 1:23 PM PST

Court tosses Gibson's Guitar Hero suit

by Leslie Katz
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 11 comments

A California court has tossed out Gibson Guitar's patent infringement lawsuit against Guitar Hero maker Activision, saying Gibson's arguments "border on the frivolous."

The iconic guitar manufacturer filed suit in March 2008, charging that Guitar Hero's mock guitars infringed on a 1999 patent, U.S. Patent No. 5,990,405 (PDF).

Guitar Hero image (Credit: Activision)

That patent, also known as "The '405 Patent," covers "a system and method for generating and controlling a simulated musical concert experience." Specifically, it details a head-mounted display that includes stereo speakers and is worn while playing an instrument along with a simulated concert.

Earlier that same month, in a series of legal volleys preceding the suit, Gibson filed for declaratory relief--asking for compensation, in other words. But Activision decided it didn't need a license under Gibson's patent and said so in a legal countermeasure. Then came Gibson's suit.

In last week's ruling (PDF), a U.S. District Court basically decided that Gibson's patent only applies to devices that output an analog signal. "As a general observation, no reasonable person of ordinary skill in the relevant arts would interpret the '405 Patent as covering interactive video games," the ruling stated.

The court added that Gibson's interpretation of its patent could be extended to cover things from a "button of a DVD remote...to a pencil tapping a table."

But Activision isn't Gibson's only target. It sued major retailers--including Amazon, Target, Wal-Mart, and K-Mart--that sell games like Guitar Hero and Rock Band. Plus, it added MTV, Harmonix, and Electronic Arts to its list of plaintiffs. MTV, which acquired Guitar Hero developer Harmonix in 2006, uses EA as the distributor for Rock Band and is likely turning up the celebratory tunes following the Activision ruling.

Leslie Katz, senior editor of CNET's Crave, covers gadgets, games, and most other digital distractions. As a co-host of the CNET News Daily Podcast, she sometimes tries to channel Terry Gross. E-mail Leslie.
Recent posts from Crave
New, terrifying, no-electronics U.S. flight security rules?
Apple's iSlate: What we know for sure
Best hardware and software add-ons for your PC
Kindle is most gifted Amazon item, ever
Android eHow app: Get and share advice on anything
Will recorded music survive the 2010s?
Monitor OSD Quick Guide: (Some of) the ins and outs
So you've got a Zune...now what?
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by techwiz2001 March 3, 2009 2:28 PM PST
On day all progress will stop, because any new technology invented will have something to do with an old patent and the lawsuits will come.

Company's no longer try to make better products for customers. They wait for their competitor to and then sue them for all their earnings.

GOD BLESS AMERICA

techwiz2000
hooahtech,.blogspot.com
Reply to this comment
by BLSCPTS March 3, 2009 2:28 PM PST
I'm going to patent toe tapping....

Oh wait, Gibson already has that, drat!
Reply to this comment
by SeizeCTRL March 3, 2009 2:50 PM PST
HAHA! Finally we get a judge with a clue... Gibson was absolutely retarded over this one.
Reply to this comment
by aka_tripleB March 3, 2009 2:53 PM PST
Is there any other type of guitar besides Gibson? Because if I ever decide to take up guitar, I really would prefer not to suppose those morons.
Reply to this comment
by TheGeekReview March 3, 2009 7:01 PM PST
Fender makes some of the very best guitars out there.
by mmntech March 3, 2009 3:35 PM PST
I must admit it's humourous to see the entertainment industry accused of IP theft. However, Gibson's suit is still unethical and frivolous. When did law suits become a viable revenue stream for corporations? "We're not selling our products, is there someone we can sue instead". Ridiculous. No wonder the legal system is clogged.
Reply to this comment
by dumbspammers March 3, 2009 4:05 PM PST
If the USPTO were doing the job for which it was created, such non-novle and obvious patent applications would be rejected out-of-hand, just like the 235 Microsoft patents which MS claims "Linux is infringing." Just to prove a point, a 5-year-old boy (with his father's help) has patented a method of swinging sideways on a swing (US Patent Number 6,368,227, in 2002); No matter how obvious, no matter how much prior art exists, ANY patent application which can't be seen immediately as infringing an existing patent will be granted by the USPTO, as long as you pony up the $5000 fee they charge for the rubber-stamping of your paperwork.

Gibson filed the patent because they could, period. Dick Cheney shot a lawyer in the face; he claimed it was an accident, but you have to wonder...
Reply to this comment
by JohnSegal March 3, 2009 7:08 PM PST
You can download US 5,990,405 for free in PDF format from Patent Retriever http://www.patentretriever.com
Reply to this comment
by ducttape36 March 4, 2009 8:03 AM PST
gibson should be thankful guitar hero even exists. studies show guitar playing is up dramatically due to the popularity of that game and gibson guitars are featured heavily in it. its great advertising for gibson.
Reply to this comment
by March 4, 2009 10:48 AM PST
Right, I thought it was quite ironic that the picture that accompanied this article prominently featured a Les Paul...
Reply to this comment
by jfur March 14, 2009 3:09 AM PDT
I think I'm missing something here. If Gibson wanted to mess with Activision, why not a trade dress suit? (or even TM -- registration?)

Gibson guitars like the Les Paul and the SG have immediately identifiable shapes that anyone familiar with the market associates with Gibson. I presumed that Activision had licensed these from Gibson?
Reply to this comment
(11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.