February 27, 2009 10:40 AM PST

Edge-lit LED by Sony reviewed: Thin, expensive

by David Katzmaier
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 10 comments

The edge-lit Sony KLV-40ZX1M measures just 1.1 inch thick.

(Credit: CNET)

As if 240Hz, 1080p/24 compatibility and contrast ratios in the millions aren't confusing enough, get ready for more product differentiation in the LCD TV space: two different kinds of LED lighting schemes. On one hand are relatively tried-and-true "local dimming" LED-based LCDs, which generally give great picture. In the other are "edge-lit" LED-based LCDs, which if the new Sony KLV-40ZX1M ($3,999) is any indication, do not.

We're sure the distinction won't stop marketers from trying to equate the two, however, and simply call them all "LED TVs," expecting consumers to assume that all LED-based LCDs give great picture. In fact, one company, Samsung, has already said it wants to create a separate "LED TV" category to differentiate the more-expensive, higher-tech-sounding sets from their lowly fluorescent-backlit cousins.

Also, who knows, maybe Samsung's upcoming edge-lit models, namely the 6000, 7000, and 8000 series HDTVs announced at CES, will perform better than the Sony KLV-40ZX1M we just reviewed. Lighter black levels and imperfect uniformity hampered its picture--as you might expect, the edges of the picture were brighter than the middle (go figure!). It sure looks cool though.

Read the full review of the Sony KLV-40ZX1M.

Below you'll find the settings we found best for viewing the Sony KLV-40ZX1M in a completely dark room via the HDMI input with a 1080p, film-based source. Your settings may very depending on source, room conditions and personal preference. Check out the Picture settings and calibration FAQ for more information.

Picture menu
Motion Enhancer: Off
CineMotion: Auto 1
Game Mode: Off
Video/Photo Optimizer: Video-A

Picture Adjustments menu:
Picture Mode: Cinema
Backlight: 2
Picture: Max
Brightness: 52
Color: 60
Hue: 0
Color Temperature: Warm2
Sharpness: 4
Noise Reduction: Off
MPEG Noise Reduction: Off

Advanced Settings menu:
Black Corrector: Off
Advanced C.E.: Off
Gamma: Off
Clear White: Off
Color Space: Standard
Live Color: Off [grayed out]

White Balance menu:
R-Gain: -7
G-Gain: -2
B-Gain: -7
R-Bias: 2
G-Bias: 1
B-Bias: -5

Screen menu
Wide Mode: Full
Auto Wide: Off
4:3 Default: [grayed out]
Display Area: Full Pixel

David Katzmaier reviews HDTVs for CNET. E-mail David or follow him on Twitter @katzmaiercnet.
Recent posts from Crave
Robots in 2009: The wackier, the better
Time Warner Cable shows subscribers how to cut cord
Times Square New Year's Eve Ball, a timeline
Want to see Google's new phone on YouTube?
Photographers bless improved Canon autofocus
Gadgettes Podcast 168: The Web obviously-not-exclusive-at-all-anymore Episode
Report: Apple event to be held January 26
Job ad suggests Xbox Live headed for WinMo phones
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Wes#1 February 27, 2009 11:46 AM PST
David, In your 9/3/08 "Editor's Take" on this TV, you commented on the super-thin cabinet and asked: "Do you have any interest in a thinner-than-average flat TV?" My answer is NO!! Who cares if the set is 3.8 inches or .38 inches? The "thin is in" mentality of these manufacturers is an absurd fad that needs to go away. If they would put less engineering into making LCD panels thinner, and instead deliver deeper blacks and wider viewing angles, then we'd have finally have a set that looks better ON than OFF!

And close to $4k for a 40-incher? What a joke. Wake up, Sony!!
Reply to this comment
by poultryfish February 27, 2009 12:29 PM PST
Isn't that why OLED was invented? Its the best of both worlds, thin, better viewing angles, deepest blacks, right?
by February 28, 2009 8:50 PM PST
Flat TVs will enable lighter screens so we can hang them on the wall much more easily (enables giant screens too). LCD probably can't get that thin, but OLED surely can.
by ikramerica--2008 February 27, 2009 11:35 PM PST
OLED was invented to give the quality of a plasma without the expensive manufacturing costs and super heavy construction. It is also flexible.

As for this thin garbage, any TV that is thiner than the connectors that bring it a signal is stupid, because it just requires a breakout box anyway.

And edge lighting is just a dumb idea. The goal is a uniform brightness picture. LED backlighting can offer this (local dimming foolishness aside). Flourescent can't, and edge lighting surely can't. No wonder Sony is in trouble, wasting money and time on stupid projects like this...
Reply to this comment
by MrMurder February 28, 2009 3:28 PM PST
I wonder why I even bothered reading this article if I'm a plasma fan.
Reply to this comment
by 8IronBob February 28, 2009 7:03 PM PST
Hmm... All this talk makes an LED DLP RPTV seem really good right about now.
Reply to this comment
by February 28, 2009 8:45 PM PST
Samsung, please don't call the LED backlit TVs LED TVs. This will undermine not only the potential sucess of proper OLED TVs, but also REAL LED TVs when they come out in the future (direct illumination basically like OLED, but with inorganic materials used instead).
Reply to this comment
by insane consumer February 28, 2009 10:10 PM PST
A better solution for local dimming, using cold cathode technology, is to introduce an lcd layer that contains a grid of variable elements between the light and the regular display. Each element can be addressed individually to dim the display light to produce, in effect, the same goal that led's achieve except that this method will be much cheaper and easier to implement and have the same effect on the image.
Reply to this comment
by NOBLEBOBOY March 1, 2009 3:08 AM PST
ANOTHER FOOLISHNESS BY SONY. WAKE UP SONY !!!!!!!!!!!!
I am a SONY fanatic for decades and thank God I woke up from these greedy companies like Sony.
Reply to this comment
by Pacu102 March 2, 2009 12:38 PM PST
Don't like it? Don't buy it and stop whining
Reply to this comment
(10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.