• On TV.com: Why Is Everyone in TV High School SO OLD
February 24, 2009 11:23 AM PST

Dial4Light to turn off street lights with your phone

by Juniper Foo
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 10 comments
Dial4Light

Imagine being able to control street lights with your mobile phone. This isn't a prank, but an eco-friendly solution now in place in parts of Germany.

The (I must add) responsible denizens there have put in place a system called Dial4Light that lets cell phone users turn on the street lamps only when someone actually needs illumination. We won't suggest this for streets like Harlem or the dodgier parts of Asia since it's so easily subject to abuse.

Much like your very own on/off switch at home, this one requires you to dial up the lights, with a 15-minute grace period before it gets pitch black again. And the best bit, a reported cost savings of 25 percent in power bills for the the towns, not to mention everyone doing their bit to reduce their carbon footprint. Just don't leave home without your phone.

Watch the video at BBC News.

(Via Crave Asia)

Recent posts from Crave
Killer deals on BlackBerry, Droid, and Palm Pixi
This week in Crave: The boxed-in edition
Ricky Gervais helps reveal pain of cell phone salesmen
Indecent Exposure 68: Inky extents
Apple fixes AirPort problems marring video playback on 27-inch iMacs
iPhone: The board gamer's paradise
Can erasing your iPhone's memory improve performance?
Top 5 best products of the fall
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by retroboy77 February 24, 2009 12:13 PM PST
It's like the "Put-outer" from Harry Potter!
Reply to this comment
by Zandora777 February 24, 2009 12:24 PM PST
This is stupid. If you don't have a cellphone w/ this feature then you have to deal w/ the dark. Also, having to dial the lights every time you want to walk (or drive by) would be way too inconvenient, not to mention dangerous while driving. If you were driving, by the time you got the lights on you would be past them.
Reply to this comment
by janpbs February 24, 2009 12:30 PM PST
This is a great idea. Unfortunately, some smart criminals would take advantage of this here in the States and turn off lights so that they could commit crimes.
Reply to this comment
by PittCaleb February 24, 2009 12:50 PM PST
We've been doing this in the General Aviation community for quite some time (read: decades). Many small airports have lights that only turn on when you key the mic a number of times on a specific frequency. They only stay on for a set period of time and then turn off again.
Reply to this comment
by aka_tripleB February 24, 2009 1:16 PM PST
One question: how do you know what number to call for each light?
Reply to this comment
by viper396 February 24, 2009 1:49 PM PST
Why not just put a motion/heat sensor into the lights to detect when someone is around? (the floodlight in my driveway does that) Motion/heat sensing lighting is tried and true and works fine for office buildings, public restrooms, and around homes so why couldn't they use them in street lights instead of requiring everyone to carry a cell phone?

Having to use your cellphone to turn on a streetlight seems like a complex solution to a relatively simple problem.
Reply to this comment
by USDecliningDollar February 24, 2009 2:08 PM PST
viper396 - your suggestio
by LunaticSX February 24, 2009 2:31 PM PST
Why does the headline say that this story is about turning OFF street lights, when the text of the story is clearly about turning them ON?

If criminals could dial up a light and tell it to turn off, then indeed there would be problems. That's not the case, though. The street lights only turn off when 15 minutes have elapsed since the last time someone dialed them up to turn them on. There's probably an additional timer involved, too, set for the average length of time it takes a person to walk from one end to the other of the lit up row of lights. The 15 minute timer would only start after that.

Also, no doubt this is only for pedestrian areas, and wouldn't be implemented for roads. (Besides, cars have headlights anyway.)
Reply to this comment
by RKRKAR February 24, 2009 7:08 PM PST
Another solution running around looking for the problem. Can anyone say environmentalist?
Reply to this comment
by ColinHenshaw April 1, 2009 6:09 AM PDT
This is an excellent idea that will help reduce greenhouse emissions. Street lighting should only be used sparingly on a needs must basis, where needed, when needed, and in the correct amounts. If this suggestion could be more generally applied it will go a long way to curb the general abuse of street lighting that we see in our cities. Most crime occurs in daylight, ergo criminals need light. Contrary to the generally held belief, street lighting does not reduce crime. If anything it promotes it by encouraging people to behave more at night as they do during the day. With less lighting, crime statistics should go down, so if this idea becomes more widespread, the benefits will be enormous.
The environmental effects of street and other forms of lighting at night are now well established, so if amount of it can be reduced and normal darkness restored, then wildlife will also benefit.
Reply to this comment
(10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

A CNET Conversation with Eric Schmidt

CNET's Tom Krazit and Molly Wood sit down with Google CEO Eric Schmidt to discuss the future of Android, the Chrome OS, the problem of real-time search indexing, and more.

Verizon tests sending RIAA copyright notices

The No. 2 phone company, known for its reluctance to intervene in antipiracy cases, strikes an agreement to forward copyright notices on behalf of the music industry.