Holiday season reminder: Buy cheap HDMI cables
In the bustle of holiday shopping, it's easy to be persuaded by the salesperson at your local retailer that you need to buy a $50 HDMI cable to make your new gear work. They might say the expensive cable "supports faster speeds," "has better video quality," or that "cheap cables don't support 1080p"--pretty much anything to get you to throw that high-margin HDMI cable in your shopping cart. But the truth is that expensive HDMI cables aren't worth it and the cheap cables available online are just as good. In fact, our guide to HDMI cables says this in bold, at the top of the page:
CNET strongly recommends cheap HDMI cables widely available from online retailers instead of the expensive counterparts sold in your local electronics store.
The full guide explains all the reasons in detail, but the main takeaway is that you should never pay more than $10 for a standard 6-foot HDMI cable. Cheap HDMI cables can be found all over the Web--we've had good experiences with both Monoprice and Amazon. Then you can take the money you saved and get some gear that's actually worth it--check out CNET's Holiday Gift Guide for suggestions.


But even going to other retailers will sometimes yield cheaper cables.
most people can't deal with having the tv sitting in a room for 4 days while they wait on a cable to come in the mail.
In the case I experienced above I had to resort back to a higher end cable for sure, so what you say is definitely true that it CAN make a difference. I just think that C/NET is saying is that for MOST people they probably will NOT see or hear the difference in their systems. Most people do NOT have really high end systems that will reveal those differences. So i see why C/NET is telling people to start with low end cables and not be swayed by sales pitches that ONLY high end cables will do. I couldn't help but to chuckle a bit when you referred to C/NET as an audiophile/videophile entity. It's a nice site but HARDLY anything really esoteric. I mean you're not going to see too much Conrad Johnson, Krell, MacIntosh, Martin Logan type stuff here very often (well sometimes). Peace !!!
10$ cables, with absolutely no problems at all. The cables either work or they dont. If there are problems with sound or picture, it is because some connection in the cable may be bad. So what, you can buy 10 of these cables before you get to the price of a Monster cable. Do some more research on the net, or compare side to side, you will see there is no difference. Anybody reading this, do NOT waste your money on expensive cables. Do what I did, buy 3 at 5 bucks a piece (on sale at Amazon) and you will probably have 3 great cables. If one does not work, so what. Cnet, keep up the honest evaluations. Thanks
Back to the story. Cnet has documented in previous articles that they've tried out multiple hdmi cables and never noticed any difference. Now we've got people trying to justify their expensive cable purchase by defending it to the end. Hmmm, imagining the difference to sleep better at night? Naaaa
No offense - but admitting you have a bose says a lot. They're one of the most overpriced and least capable players out there. They can't even play a DVD-RW that any $25 samsung, emerson and apex player can handle with ease. They freeze, lock and skip and spend more time on tech's benches than cheaper players. (Two of my friends are on their 3rd main unit). So I wouldn't brag about a Bose as knowing how to choose a quality system.
I have a dozen friends with Bose, Pioneer Elite, Sony XBR and the like.... and I feel bad for them... They didn't even consider systems like mine because it lacked bragging rights. Yet for 1/5th the cost, I have a very comparable, high-quality experience... (with no payments).
And that is I have exceptional hearing and eyesight (DLPs give me motion sickness... the artifacting and ghosting of even the best LCDs drives me NUTS... and I had a hard time watching TV until about 10 years ago when they finally got that high-pitch whine out of all but the cheapest sets...).
As far as the topic, get good cables, yes, but one does not need the ones designed to clip the buyer.
Oh, and so you also know, much of what is sold on fleabay are clones, not true brands. Hope you got lucky and did get your (overpriced) Monster cables cheap rather than the chinese knockoffs.
I am looking forward to the guy who buys a Pioneer elite and tells me he will put a $1 Hdmi cable on it.
I have a Pioneer Elite Kuro and monoprice HDMI cables worked just fine. How do I know? I used the uber-expensive Monster Cables from Best Buy while waiting for my "$1 cable" to arrive in the mail. I figured if after a comparison test the Monster really is better then I would only have been out 5 bucks for trying monoprice. I returned the Monster stuff ASAP and saved myself $$$ because there were no differences whatsoever.
Don't get me wrong, there are good cables out there. I use anti-ic's for all my interconnects and they made a world of difference. The important distinction is that there are "good" expensive cables and "bad" (overpriced) expensive cables. Monster Cables and its ilk certainly fall in the latter category.
Bottom line, test everything yourself. Start with the cheapest and move up *only* if you're not satisfied.
I'm going to be buying the Samsung LN55A950 with a Samsung BD-P2550 along with a Bose LS38. Also with this I will have my HD cable box connected. All I have to do is go to Walmart and get $9.00 HDMI cables?
C'mon Cnet! If I'm investing 10k why would I run this $9.00 HDMI cable?
there's one born every minute... wish i was the sales guy when you show up... i'd sell you that wonderful extended warranty too.
My $7 12" foot cable from monoprice delievers 1080p just fine to my TV so I just don't get it.
Is there a difference between the $100 HDMI's and the $10 ones? Sure.
Is there a $90 difference? Nope.
Same with 720p vs 1080p tv's...why spend $1000's more for somthing that is only incrementally better?
And can someone explain to me why Sony thinks it's wise to charge $2000+ for a 40" LCD when you can get a 50 inch plasma, with a better picture, for less than $1000????!!!!???? They must be joking!!! No wonder they're about to lay off 8000 full time and 8000 part time workers...
120hz is better than 60
1080p is better than 720p
Sony is better than Dynex
Hyundai's and Ferrari's are very comparable.
Anyone who pays attention to this stuff knows that the Pioneer PLASMA is the reference monitor for many experts. There's even a review on CNET today clearly stating what a ripoff (I read between the lines) the Sony LCD's are. If you buy a $100 HDMI and a $2400 40" LCD you are a fool. Even if money is no object for you, the Sony LCD's are not the best anyway.
"You might get a sub-$1000 plasma with better picture but not better quality."
huh?
all i care about is the picture.
and per your earlier comment about finding someone to service my plasma?
a. yes, i will be able to find someone to service for years and years to come.
b. who cares? tv's are becoming better and cheaper all the time. in a few years, i'm the type who will want a new one anyway.... my panasonic plasma is a few years old, looks better than any lcd you currently have, and is working just fine. granted, my next tv will probably be a lcd in a few years... but that will be then, this is now.
however... the quality is the same.
Gizmodo ran a test on Monoprice vs. Monster Cable using the equipment at the Monster Cable facility. Basically, they found that the Monoprice cable performed just as well as the Monster cable up at 6-35ft lengths. Hard to argue with that.
I won't get started on best buy worker knowledge.....
you forgot to mention something me thinks....
There is absolutely no difference in a high end or low end cable as long as it meets the 1.3 spec. Do not be fooled.
Fast Forward. If the Cable meets the Digital Specification, buy the most inexpensive.
I, in fact, used this article as the reference to buy a HDMI cable for my BluRay Panasonic DMP-BD35 Player. 10 bucks. Done.
Happy New Year
Caio'
- by iceman721 December 25, 2008 9:21 AM PST
- For those in need of instant gratification do what I did. I bought a Monster 1000HD cable with my new Samsung series 6 plasma from CC (pre-bankruptcy). I demo'd the cable while waiting on Monoprice to ship my "real" 24 gauge HDMI 1.3 Category 2 cables. I returned my Monster cable to the store within a few days after receiving all of my Monoprice cables that I would be using to connect my entire home theater system. I tested the Monster cable directly against the Monoprice cable and I can say with no problem that there is NO DIFFERENCE. The only way I would even think of using a name brand cable is if I had a long run (over 15ft) of cable maybe behind a wall. I don't so I am using my Monoprice HDMI cables to connect my DVR, Onkyo A/V receiver, Blu Ray/HD DVD player & Media Center Computer. No issues at all.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (56 Comments)The other kicker is that all of my Monoprice HDMI cables and 100ft of speaker wire including shipping were about 30 dollars less than that one Monster cable. Waste your money if you want I chose to spend mine wisely.
Merry Christmas!!