• On CHOW: Why does asparagus make your pee smell?
December 4, 2008 11:38 AM PST

Bluetooth 2.2 to be released in mid-2009

by Nicole Lee
Bluetooth 2.2 to debut next year

Bluetooth 2.2 to debut next year.

(Credit: Bluetooth)

According to the analysts over at IMS Research, the Bluetooth Special Interest Group (SIG) will release a new version of Bluetooth in mid-2009, tentatively dubbed Bluetooth 2.2. Bluetooth 2.2 promises to be much faster than previous versions, allowing transfer rates at higher speeds.

The new High Speed Bluetooth specification will work in conjunction with WLAN or USB for improved data rates, and will be known as Bluetooth 10x and Bluetooth 100x, respectively. It will hopefully allow for wireless video streaming, wireless printing, and more. For this to work, your cell phone will have to have WLAN or UWB radio. It's said that Bluetooth 10x will be used first, since a lot of handsets have Wi-Fi capabilities now.

Since we don't have any news of devices that will use this new Bluetooth specification, we can't tell if it delivers its promises. But once we have some compatible devices on hand, we'll try it out and let you know.

UPDATE 12/05/08: The Bluetooth SIG just contacted us to let us know the new Bluetooth profile will NOT be called Bluetooth 2.2. We've also updated the source of this story, as it was inaccurate previously.

Nicole Lee is an associate editor for CNET, covering cell phones, Bluetooth headsets, and all things mobile. She's also pretty geeky--she likes World of Warcraft, comic books, and shiny gadgets. E-mail Nicole.
Recent posts from Crave
I wear my suncontacts at night
Fireplace doubles as pizza oven
Wi-Fi Body Scale Twitters your weight daily
Sponge absorbs 180 times its weight (in toxic sludge)
Prizefight: Motorola Droid vs. iPhone 3GS
Accessories for the iPod Touch
Beware the Blue Yeti
Smartphone users, keep complaining
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by xZero2007x December 4, 2008 5:37 PM PST
Quite interesting to hear that bluetooth is still being improved. After trying out streaming audio via A2DP, I have to say that I was quite disappointed with the results. A lot of times, it seemed as if the data stream was being heavily stressed when in reality, the actual streaming should have only been taking up a fraction of the total output capacity. Hopefully, I'll see some change with profile 2.2.
Also, I'm hoping that drivers become better built and ready to go when 2.2 comes out. To be frank, a lot of bluetooth transceivers (accessory and PC-hardware wise) have been far from perfect in terms of consistency from product to product and overall performance.
At least Bluetooth 10x will be utilizing WLAN, limiting what needs to be upgraded on existing machines.

In any case, I'm hoping version 2.2 can meet my [high] expectations.
Reply to this comment
by wlau December 4, 2008 6:53 PM PST
I am surprised the original poster has issue with A2DP because it's extremely reliable and I use it on my laptop and mobile phone to listen to MP3 all the time. The quality is awesome, up to 16bit and 48kHz stereo. I am not sure what "heavily stressed" he is referring to. In fact, it's so reliable that I ditched corded headphones.
Reply to this comment
by random truth December 5, 2008 12:27 AM PST
I wonder if this can be an upgrade by software like how apple released an N networking enabler and an update to the bluetooth chips firmware to make it 2.1+EDR Compatible
Reply to this comment
by AppleSuxLeo December 5, 2008 4:22 PM PST
By that time...iPhony will still have BT 1.0
Reply to this comment
by random truth December 5, 2008 5:19 PM PST
Seriously, no one cares what you think AppleSuxLeo. This is a post about bluetooth 2.2. We are not going to turn this into an apple product vs. other debate. Heres an abstract concept, people buy things they like. Yeah I mentioned apple their, big whoop its a company, they exist ultimately to make money (NOT, to please your every whim). This fanboyism on both sides is annoying and then when you think its bad enought the people who use linux feel they have to fuel the fire. Remember this post when you wnnt to comment on the mac vs. pc debate.
by AppleSuxLeo December 5, 2008 7:04 PM PST
BT 1.0 will have to do...because Stevie knows what is best for you ;)
by random truth December 6, 2008 9:11 PM PST
@AppleSuxLeo
What do you not get. I said nothing about bluetooth on the iphone. I was ranting against fanboys and all these stupid comments. I was talking about my macbook up 2 posts ago, but might as well comment about your bluetooth 1.0 claim. The iPhone has a bluetooth 2.0+EDR chip inside it. It has very few bluetooth profiles installed in the software. An example for this is that windows does not support bluetooth audio by default, but you can install a driver from bluesoliel to support make it support it. The same can be done with the iphone by a future software update. I am not saying that apple is right I am just pointing out simple facts. So lesson is dont be blind to love or hate.
by cobra--2008 December 6, 2008 9:48 AM PST
wlau, your experience is different from Zero's, but mine is similar to Zero's. I think the point to take away is that BT today is not a reliable solution. Consumers cannot be confident that pairing source x with receiver y will result in a satisfactory experience.

I use a BT-capable cell phone as a handsfree phone and MP3 music source, paired with a BT-capable car stereo receiver. While the actual phone function of the pairing works well, the music functionality is marginal. Sound quality is poor and the handshaking between phone and car only works properly ~80% of the time.

BT has been around for years now, and BT-capable products should NOT have hiccups like this. You may have two devices that pair well together, but we're far from a world where 100% of pairable devices work well together. From a consumer perspective, that's very disappointing.
Reply to this comment
by xZero2007x December 7, 2008 1:51 PM PST
@cobra--2008:

You totally nailed what I was trying to say.

@wlau:

Don't get me wrong. I found bluetooth to be an enjoyable experience overall. What I meant when I said "heavily stressed," was that the hardware/software weren't working in a fully efficient matter. Bluetooth 1.0 supposedly had enough bandwidth to handle A2DP, but even with the larger output from 2.x, it's been far from reliable enough to become a standard anyone would want to use. I consider myself a light audiophile, and the performance I've had from the Voyager 855 was only mediocre. Hiccups occur once in a while with devices themselves, and its even worse on the computer--driver support isn't standard across the different hardware manufacturers, and apparently on some set ups, if the load on the other USB buses exceeds a certain thresh hold, you'll see that impact your bluetooth performance.

Point is (and I'm going to re-emphasize what cobra--2008 caught on from my original post), with all the years BT's had to grow into a capable technology, it's far from perfect. It's brought some innovative ideas, but other technologies have overtaken it in a lot of the purposes BT originally had. It's not 100% ready for the consumer market today and because of that, I'm setting high expectations for 2.2 to meet.
Reply to this comment
by guymatrin December 8, 2008 11:54 AM PST
http://www.wirelessweek.com//Bluetooth-SIG-2009-Update.aspx

The update will probably be 3.0
Reply to this comment
(10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

As alternative energy grows, NIMBY greens

With more renewable energy projects trying to come online, the country grapples with the balance between local land use and a national push for clean energy.

Google to remake programming with Go

A Unix co-creator is among those behind a language Google hopes will speed computers and programming. Today, Go becomes open-source software.