About that $300 laptop at Wal-Mart...
Have you seen this laptop?
(Credit: Wal-Mart)Last Friday, Wal-Mart announced a selection of in-store discounts, including a 15-inch Compaq laptop for $298, that would be part of a one-day, in-store sale. That day, November 8, has come and gone, but what about the remaining supplies of the participating laptop, the Compaq CQ50-139WM?
The laptop is listed on Wal-Mart's Web site, but you can't buy it online or even find out the price, which is listed as varying by store. I used Walmart.com's store locator earlier today and plugged in more than a dozen zip codes chosen at random to find out if it was still available and, if so, for how much. Every result returned was the same: Not in stock.
I gave up and submitted my First Take of the product to copy edit this morning, and full-time copy editor and part-time Crave blogger Daren Darrow uncovered Compaq CQ50-139WM hiding out in his home state of Oklahoma. We both called the Henryetta, Okla., Wal-Mart and were told that they have the laptop, but it costs $398.
Even at $400, it still costs less than most Netbooks. Given that it uses a single-core Intel Celeron processor, it likely performs on par with a Netbook, but with less battery life. For those on a tight budget who care more about screen size than portability, the Compaq CQ50-139WM might work. Good luck finding though. If you've had any luck finding this laptop, please let me and Crave readers know below.


Expect a repeat of this item at $298 on Black Friday. But expect the lines to be 100 times longer and campers pitching their tents the day before. That's why I moved on this deal, I knew very few folks had even heard about it. I got there at 6:15 and had only 10 folks ahead of me. Turns out, I could have got there at 6:55 and still scored. But all bets are off for Black Friday given the state of the economy. It's gonna be a zoo at every outlet.
Also comes with Norton and other nice security features. The cost was $289. Not a bad buy, lots of ram, disk space, modems and DVD-RW drive. Well worth the wait and $$.
The price of the laptop (at any Walmart that still has it in stock) has gone up because it was on sale. The definition of a sale, you ask? "A special disposal of goods at lowered prices."
I cannot believe this crap of an article made it to the cnet homepage.
Cnet raised questions as it relates to the make (Compaq) vis-a-vis its affordability. Similarly, allow me to raise this question: When was the brand of a PC mattered? I thought it was all about specs. The specs are well worth the price even at $499, much more so at $298.
Seriously, just bite the bullet and spend the 700-1400 dollars on a good notebook. You will thank yourself in the long run, because a good notebook today like the Gateway one my family just bought can last you a good 7 years, at least.
This deal is very average.
Let me say this: true, we are in rough economic times, but at the end of the day you need peace of mind. If you are planning on doing any serious work on your computer, buy a GOOD machine. When it comes to laptops, the $100-500 laptops are built one way and the $1,000-3,000 are built another way. From my own personal experience, cheap laptops start falling apart after a few months. Keyboard keys fall out, speakers blow out, headphone jack stops working, screen starts flickering, etc...
If you are making a list which household items to invest in, COMPUTERS should be one of them. (Along with treadmills and cars). You don't want to have a heart attack waiting for a program to open.
- by JLDSeattle November 10, 2008 11:26 PM PST
- I actually wasted valuable reading time on this article. If you are on a budget get an iphone. It will be more reliable than one of these cheap last a year computers.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by tnut13 November 11, 2008 10:13 AM PST
- That's a silly suggestion. An iphone has serious limitations compared to any PC and a 100.00 per month use penalty. You could save your monthly fee for 6 months and get a great machine.
- Like this
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (46 Comments)I actually wasted time responding to your post.