'Fallout 3' springs for a full-page 'NYT' ad
It's a clear sign of the continuing evolution of video games when hot titles splurge on big mainstream media ads. The most shocking example we've seen recently has been Tuesday's Election Day New York Times, where Fallout 3 was featured in a full-color, full-page ad (see below), taking up the coveted back cover spot of the paper's "A" section.
That's especially surprising, as Fallout isn't a particularly mainstream brand, along the lines of the Halo or the Rock Band franchises, but a fairly serious RPG that requires a multi-hour investment of time to get into, and offers little in the way of immediate gratification (not that we're not enjoying the game, having just passed the 39-hour mark).
The ad plays up a string of recent "perfect" review scores (a contentious topic we discuss on the latest episode of the Digital City podcast), but we doubt that more than a small slice of the paper's daily readers would be in the right demographic group for a full-page video game ad, especially one that quotes the Official Xbox Magazine or GameSpy.
Are newspaper ads a smart investment for games? What game do you think will be the next to buy a full page in the New York Times?
New York native Dan Ackerman, a former radio DJ turned journalist, has written about technology and music for publications including Spin, Blender, The Hollywood Reporter, and USA Today. He hosts the weekly Digital City podcast and the New York edition of Editors' Office Hours. Dan's new album, Tales Out of Night School, is available now. E-mail Dan. 
Thank you, Fallout 3! advertising unit - here, take my money!"
- by spoJohnny November 6, 2008 10:13 AM PST
- Excellent point FunButGunshy! I'm the tech-guy and gaming in my family, and I always get asked the adults in the family which games they should get for the kids. I get asked all times of the year, but extra right before the holidays. Seems like a good market ploy to me; not all non-techie grandparents, aunts, uncles, etc have a family member to ask advice of.
- Reply to this comment
-
(3 Comments)